The moon

, Volume 9, Issue 3–4, pp 355–395 | Cite as

Morphology and structure of the taurus-littrow highlands (Apollo 17): evidence for their origin and evolution

  • James W. Head


The Taurus-Littrow region (Apollo 17 landing area) is located in the northeastern quadrant of the Moon in the mountainous area on the southeastern rim of the Serenitatis basin. The highlands in the Taurus-Littrow region can be divided into three broad terrain types. (1)Littrow massifs - massive, 10-20 km diam, steep-sloped (20°–30°), highland blocks often bordered by linear graben-like valleys. (2)Littrow sculptured hills - a series of closely spaced 1-5 km diam domical hills occupying broad highland plateaus which have been cratered and block faulted. Sculptured hill units stretch along the eastern edge of Serenitatis from the Apollo 17 area north to Posidonius. (3)Vitruvius front and plateau - a long irregular but generally north-trending scarp (occasionally rising over 2 km above the surrounding terrain) and its associated uplifted plateau to the east. This terrain is composed of hills ranging from 2-7 km diam, whose morphology is intermediate between the sculptured hills and the massifs.

It is concluded that the highland units in the Taurus-Littrow region are primarily related to the origin of the Serenitatis basin because of their marked similarity to more well-preserved basin-related deposits in the younger Imbrium and Orientale basins: (1) the massifs and sculptured terra are morphologically similar to the Imbrium basin-related Montes Alpes and Alpes Formation, (2) the relative geographic position of the Taurus-Littrow highlands and Montes Alpes/Alpes Formation is the same, forming the second ring and spreading distally, and (3) the structures are similar in orientation and development (e.g., massifs are related to radial and concentric structure; Alpes Formation/sculptured terra are not).

Interpretation of the massifs and sculptured hills as Serenitatis impact-related deposits lessens the possible role of highland volcanism in the origin and evolution of the Taurus-Littrow terrain, although extensive pre-Serenitatis volcanism cannot be ruled out. The preserved morphology of the sculptured hills suggests that the thickness of post-Serenitatis large basin ejecta (from Imbrium, for instance) is small, compared to the total highland section. This implies that the primary contributions to the highland stratigraphy are from Serenitatis and pre-Serenitatis events. The highland surface, however, may be dominated by ejecta from the latest nearby large event (formation of the Imbrium basin).

Structural elements mapped in the Taurus-Littrow area include lineaments, the Vitruvius structural front, two types of grabens, and scarps. The majority of lineaments, as well as some grabens, appear to be related to a dominant NW trend and subordinate N and NE trends. These trends are interpreted to be related to a more regional lunar grid pattern which formed in the area prior to the origin of the Serenitatis basin, causing distinct structural inhomogeneities in the highland terrain. The Serenitatis event produced radial and concentric structures predominantly influenced by this pre-existing trend. Younger grabens are generally circumferential to the Serenitatis basin and appear to be related to readjustment of Serenitatis-produced structures; those that are oblique to Serenitatis follow the pre-Serenitatis structural grain. No obvious structural elements can be correlated with the post-Serenitatis, Nectaris and Crisium basins. It is believed that the origin and hence the geographic concentration of the Littrow massifs is related to the fact that Serenitatis radials in the massif area coincide with lines of pre-existing structural weakness along a general lunar grid direction (NW). Pre-existing structurally weak lunar grid trends seem to have been structurally reactivated by Serenitatis radials, causing preferential uplift of large blocks in this area. Elsewhere in the region radials would be oblique to this direction. Since Serenitatis and Imbrium radials coincide in the massif area, the post-Serenitatis Imbrium event may have reactivated Serenitatis radial fractures, possibly rejuvenating the massif terrain.

The geologic and tectonic history of the Taurus-Littrow highlands began prior to the origin of Serenitatis in Tectonic Interval I. The strong NW trending structural elements are believed to have formed as part of a global stress pattern (possibly shear) sometime during this period of probable crustal formation and fragmentation. Tectonic Interval II was initiated by the origin of the Serenitatis basin. The basic topography and morphology of the region and most large grabens resulted from this event and their orientations show that they were controlled at least in part by the pre-existing grid. No other large basins forming during this interval appear to have had a major effect on the area. Tectonic Interval III is dominated by the formation of narrow grabens following structural patterns circumferential to the Serenitatis basin and tangential to it where they coincide with pre-existing grid directions. Serenitatis isostatic rebound or early mare fill may have produced this stress system. The scarp in the vicinity of the Apollo 17 landing site is the youngest obvious structural element.


Concentric Structure Massif Area Grid Direction Domical Highland Volcanism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Apollo Lunar Geology Investigation Team: 1972, ‘Preliminary Report on the Geology and Field Petrology at the Apollo 17 Landing Site’, U.S. Geological Survey Interagency Rep. Astrogeol. 69.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. B.: 1949,The Face of the Moon, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R. B.: 1963,The Measure of the Moon, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R. B.: 1971,J. Geophys. Res. 74, 8459–8465.Google Scholar
  5. Blanchet, P. H.: 1957,Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 41, 1748–1759.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, N. H.: 1966,U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv., Map I-489.Google Scholar
  7. Chadderton, L., Krajenbrink, F., Katz, R., and Poveda, A.: 1969,Nature 223, 259.Google Scholar
  8. Elston, W. E., Laughlin, A. W., and Brown, J. A.: 1971,J. Geophys. Res. 76, 5670–5674.Google Scholar
  9. Fielder, G.: 1963,Geol. Soc. London Quart. Jour. 119, 65–69.Google Scholar
  10. Fielder, G.: 1965,Lunar Geology, Butterworth Press, London.Google Scholar
  11. Green, J. and Short, N. M.: 1971,Volcanic Landforms and Surface Features, A Photographic Atlas and Glossary, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hamilton, W. L.: 1972,Science 17, 1258–1259.Google Scholar
  13. Hartmann, W. K. and Wood, C. A.: 1971,The Moon 3, 3–78.Google Scholar
  14. Hodgson, R. A.: 1961,Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 45, 2–38.Google Scholar
  15. Hoppin, R. A. and Palmquist, J. C.: 1965,Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 49, 993–1004.Google Scholar
  16. Howard, K. A. and Larsen, B. R.: 1972, ‘Lineaments That are Artifacts of Lighting’, NASA-SP-289, pp. 25-58.Google Scholar
  17. Kendall, P. F. and Briggs, H.: 1933,Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin. 53, 193.Google Scholar
  18. Lammlein, D., Dorman, J., and Latham, G.: 1972Science 176, 1259.Google Scholar
  19. Latham, G., Ewing, M., Dorman, J., Lammlein, D., Press, F., Toksőz, N., Sutton, G., Duennebier, F., and Nakamura, Y.: 1971,Science 174, 687–692.Google Scholar
  20. Lucchitta, B. K.: 1972,U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv., Map I-800.Google Scholar
  21. McGetchin, T. R., Settle, M., and Head, J. W.: 1973, ‘Radial Thickness Variation in Impact Crater Ejecta’, Lunar Implications’, submitted toEarth Planetary Sci. Letters. Google Scholar
  22. McGill, G. E.: 1971,Icarus 14, 53–58.Google Scholar
  23. McGill, G. E.: 1972,EOS 53, 430.Google Scholar
  24. Moody, J. D. and Hill, M. J.: 1956,Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 67, 1207–1246.Google Scholar
  25. Mutch, T. A.: 1970,Geol. of the Moon, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N. J.Google Scholar
  26. Offield, T. W.: 1966, ‘Structure of the Triesnecker-Hipparchus Region’, inAstrogeol. Studies Ann. Prog. Rept., July 1965-July 1966, Pt. A:U.S. Geol. Survey Open-file Report, 133-154.Google Scholar
  27. Price, N. J.: 1966,Fault and Joint Development in Brittle and Semi-Brittle Rocks, Pergamon Press, 176 p.Google Scholar
  28. Scott, D. H. and Carr, M. H.: 1972,U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv. Map I-800.Google Scholar
  29. Scott, D. and Pohn, H. A.: 1972,U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv. Map I-799.Google Scholar
  30. Short, N. M. and Forman, M. L.: 1972,Modern Geol. 3, 69–91.Google Scholar
  31. Spencer, E. W.: 1959,Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 70, 467–508.Google Scholar
  32. Spencer, E. W. and Kozak, S. J.: 1965,Washington and Lee Univ. Geol. Dept., Pub. No. 1, p. 49.Google Scholar
  33. Strom, R. G.: 1964, Comm. of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, No. 39, pp. 205-221.Google Scholar
  34. Stuart-Alexander, D. and Howard, K.: 1970,Icarus 12, 440.Google Scholar
  35. U.S. Army Topographic Command: 1972, ‘Preliminary Topographic Map of the Apollo 17 Landing Area’, (1:50000, 1:250000; zone 36).Google Scholar
  36. Van Dorn, W. G.: 1968,Nature 220, 1102.Google Scholar
  37. Wilhelms, D. and McCauley, J.: 1971,U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv., Map I-703.Google Scholar
  38. Wilshire, H. G. and Jackson, E. D.: 1972,U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 785, 26 p.Google Scholar
  39. Wise, D. U.: 1964,Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 75, 287–306.Google Scholar
  40. Wolfe, E. W. and Freeman, V.: 1972,U.S. Geol. Survey, Open-file Report.Google Scholar
  41. Wu, S. S. C., Schafer, F. J., Jordan, R., Nakata, G., and Derick, J.: 1972,Photogrammetry of Apollo 15 Photography, NASA SP-289, 25-36, and other preliminary maps.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • James W. Head
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Geological SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations