Advertisement

European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

, Volume 8, Issue 6, pp 415–420 | Cite as

Comparison of fixed interval and visual analogue scales for rating chronic pain

  • C. R. B. Joyce
  • D. W. Zutshi
  • V. Hrubes
  • R. M. Mason
Originals

Summary

A visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 4-point scale (FPS) have been compared in patients suffering from prolonged constant pain due to chronic inflammatory or degenerative arthropathy. Each patient was treated with a constant low or high dose of paracetamol or dihydrocodeine throughout a four week period. The VAS was accurate, as reliable and more sensitive than the FPS in registering the intensity of chronic pain. Separate records of each estimate, sealed immediately on completion by the patient, resulted in omission of significantly more pain recordings on the FPS, whereas retention by the patients of their previous records did not systematically influence subsequent judgments. In this study, the VAS appeared to be more satisfactory than the FPS for patient self-rating of pain intensity.

Key words

Chronic pain self-rating visual analogue scale four-point scale 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aitken, R.C.B.: Measurement of feelings using analogue scales. Proc. roy. Soc. Med.62 989–992 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aitken, R.C.B., Zealley, A.K.: Measurement of moods. Brit. J. hosp. Med.4 215–218, 221–224 (1970)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armitage, P.: Statistical methods in medical research. Oxford: Blackwell 1971Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freyd, M.: The graphic rating scale. J. educ. Psychol.14 83–102 (1923)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gaddum, J.H.: Bioassays and mathematics. Pharmacol. Rev.5 87–134 (1953)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayes, M.H.J., Peterson, D.G.: Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychol. Bull.18 98–99 (1921)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joyce, C.R.B.: The assessment of drugs with behavioural effects. In: Second symposium on advanced medicine, pp. 370–378. (Ed. Trounce, J.R.) London: Pitman 1966Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Little, J.C., McPhail, N.I.: Measurements of depressive mood at monthly intervals. Brit. J. psychiat. soc. Work122 447–452 (1973)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pan, L.: Effect on a set of self-rating ‘thermometer’ scales of knowledge of previous responses. Percept. motor Skills29 381–382 (1969)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, R.: The vocabulary of pain. In: The assessment of pain in man and animals, pp. 32–40 (Eds. Keele, C.A., Smith, R.) Edinburgh: Livingstone 1962Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G.: Statistical methods. Ames: Iowa State University Press 1967Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zealley, A.K., Aitken, R.C.B.: Measurement of mood. Proc. roy. Soc. Med.62 993–996 (1969)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ekowski, C., Hrubes, V., Joyce, C.R.B., Flood, M.K., Mason, R.M., Zutshi, D.W.: An experimental study of two methodological problems in clinical evaluation: different types of scale and availability of patients' previous judgments. Psychopharmacologia70 Suppl. 70 (1972)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Folstein, M.F., Luria, R.: Reliability, validity and clinical application of the visual analogue mood scale. Psychol. Med.3 479–486 (1973)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. R. B. Joyce
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. W. Zutshi
    • 1
    • 2
  • V. Hrubes
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. M. Mason
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.The Medical Department of Ciba-Geigy AGBaselSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of RheumatologyThe London HospitalLondonEngland

Personalised recommendations