The moon

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 87–117

A comparison of infrared, radar, and geologic mapping of lunar craters

  • T. W. Thompson
  • H. Masursky
  • R. W. Shorthill
  • G. L. Tyler
  • S. H. Zisk
Article

Abstract

Between 1000 and 2000 infrared (eclipse) and radar anomalies have been mapped on the nearside hemisphere of the Moon. A study of 52 of these anomalies indicates that most are related to impact craters and that the nature of the infrared and radar responses is compatible with a previously developed geologic model of crater aging processes. The youngest craters are pronounced thermal and radar anomalies; that is, they have enhanced eclipse temperatures and are strong radar scatterers. With increasing crater age, the associated thermal and radar responses become progressively less noticeable until they assume values for the average lunar surface. The last type of anomaly to disappear is radar enhancement at longer wavelengths. A few craters, however, have infrared and radar behaviors not predicted by the aging model. One previously unknown feature - a field strewn with centimeter-sized rock fragments - has been identified by this technique of comparing maps at the infrared, radar, and visual wavelengths.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, D. A.: 1971,The Moon 2, 320–337.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. B.: 1949,The Face of the Moon, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R. B.: 1963,The measure of the Moon, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, A. A.: 1969,J. Geophys. Res. 75, 1467–1482.Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, M. J. and Ulrichs, J.: 1969,J. Geophys. Res. 74, 5867–5881.Google Scholar
  6. Carr, M. H.: 1964,Trajectories of the Objects Producing Copernican Ray Material on Eratosthenes, U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Report, Astrogeologic Studies Progress Report, Pt. A, pp. 33-41.Google Scholar
  7. Dietz, R. S.: 1946,J. Geology 54 359–375.Google Scholar
  8. Dodd, R. T., Jr., Salisbury, J. W., and Smalley, V. C.: 1963,Icarus 2, 466–480.Google Scholar
  9. Gault, D. E.: 1970,Radio Sci. 5, 273–291.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, G. K.: 1893,Philos. Soc. Washington Bull. 12, 241–292.Google Scholar
  11. Guest, J. E. and Murray, J. B.: 1969,Planetary Space Sci. 17, 121–141.Google Scholar
  12. Hackman, R. J.: 1966,Geologic Map of the Montes Apenninus Region of the Moon: U.S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv. Map I-463 (LAC-41).Google Scholar
  13. Hagfors, T.: 1967,Radio Sci. 2, 455–465.Google Scholar
  14. Hagfors, T.: 1970,Radio Sci., No. 2, 189–227.Google Scholar
  15. Hartmann, W. K. and Kuiper, G. P.: 1962,Arizona Univ. Lunar and Planetary Lab. Comm. 1, 51–66.Google Scholar
  16. Keen, G. C.: 1965,Lunar Orbiter Photo Study Z - 3841, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Khabakov, A. V.: 1949, ‘Basic Aspects of the History of the Moon's Surface’,Zap. Vses. geogr. o-va, Nov. Ser., 6.Google Scholar
  18. Kosofsky, L. J. and El-Baz, F.: 1970,The Moon as Viewed by Lunar Orbiter, National Aeronautics and Space Adm., Spec. Pub. SP-200.Google Scholar
  19. Kuiper, G. P.: 1965, ‘Interpretation of Ranger VII Records’, inRanger VII. Part 2: Experimenters' Analyses and Interpretations, Technical Report 32-700, Pasadena, Calif., pp. 9-73.Google Scholar
  20. Kuiper, G. P., Strom, R. G., and LePoole, R.: 1966, ‘Interpretations of the Ranger Records’, inRanger VIII and IX. Part II. Experimenters' Analyses and Interpretations, Technical Report 32-800, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., 35–248.Google Scholar
  21. Lincoln Laboratory: 1968,Radar Studies of the Moon, Final Report, Vol. 2, NSR 22-0009-106, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  22. Lincoln Laboratory: 1970,Radar Studies of the Moon: Vol. I; Radar Atlas of the Moon: Vols. II and III, NAS 9-7830, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  23. Low, F. J. and Mendell, W. N.: ‘An Overview of Early Data From the Apollo 17 Infrared Scanning Radiometer’, presented at theFourth Lunar Science Conf. JSC, Houston, Texas, Mar. 5–8, 1973.Google Scholar
  24. Masursky, H.: 1968, ‘Preliminary Geologic Interpretations of Lunar Orbiter Photographs’,1969 NASA Authorization, 90th Congress H. R. 15086, No. 3, pp. 664-691.Google Scholar
  25. Masursky, H., Batson, R., and Borgeson, W.: 1970,Icarus 12, 10–45.Google Scholar
  26. McCauley, J. F.: 1967, in S. K. Runcorn (ed.),Mantles of the Earth and Terrestrial Planets, Interscience Press, New York, pp. 431–460.Google Scholar
  27. Morris, E. C., Batson, R. M., Holt, H. E., Rennilson, J. J., Shoemaker, E. M., and Whitaker, E. A.: 1968, ‘Television Observations from Surveyor VI’, inSurveyor VI Mission Report. Part II. Science Results, Technical Report 32-1265, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Google Scholar
  28. Muhleman, D. O., Brown, W. E., Davids, L., and Peake, W. H.: 1968, ‘Lunar Surface Electromagnetic Properties’, Chapter VII inSurveyor Project Final Report. Part II. Science Results, Technical Report 32-1265, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.Google Scholar
  29. Oberbeck, R. R. and Quaide, W. L.: 1968,Icarus 9, 445–465.Google Scholar
  30. Pettengill, G. H. and Thompson, T. W.: 1968,Icarus 8, 457–471.Google Scholar
  31. Pohn, H. A. and Offield, T. W.: 1970, ‘Lunar Crater Morphology and Relative Age Determination of Lunar Geologic Units - Classification’, inGeological Survey Research 1970, U.S. Geol. Survey, Prof. Paper 700-C, C153-C162.Google Scholar
  32. Quaide, W. L. and Oberbeck, V. R.: 1969,Earth-Sci. Rev. 5, 255–278.Google Scholar
  33. Roelof, E. C.: 1968,Icarus 8, 138–159.Google Scholar
  34. Schmitt, H. H., Trask, N. J., and Shoemaker, E. M.: 1967,Geologic Map of the Copernicus Quadrangle of the Moon, U. S. Geol. Survey Misc. Geol. Inv. Map I-515 (LAC-58), 1967.Google Scholar
  35. Shoemaker, E. M.: 1961,Prototype Geologic Map of the Copernicus Region of the Moon, U.S. Geol. Survey Open-File Report.Google Scholar
  36. Shoemaker, E. M.: 1962, in Z. Kopal (ed.),Physics and Astronomy of the Moon, Academic Press, New York, pp. 283–359.Google Scholar
  37. Shoemaker, E. M. and Hackmann, R. J.: 1962, in Z. Kopal and Z. K. Mikhailov (eds.), ‘The Moon’IAU Symp. 14, Academic Press, New York, pp. 298–300.Google Scholar
  38. Shoemaker, E. M. and Morris, E. C.: 1970,Radio Sci. 5, 129–155.Google Scholar
  39. Shoemaker, E. M., Hait, M. H., Swann, G. A., Schleicher, D. L., Dahlem, D. H., Schaber, G. G., and Sutton, R. L.: 1970a,Science 167, 452–455.Google Scholar
  40. Shoemaker, E. M., Hait, M. H., Swann, G. A., Schleicher, D. L., Schaber, G. G., Sutton, R. L., Dahlem, D. H., Goddard, E. N., and Waters, A. C.: 1970b,Proceedings of the Apollo 11 Lunar Sci. Conf., Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta 3 (Supplement 1), 2399–2412.Google Scholar
  41. Shorthill, R. W.: 1970,J. Spacecraft and Rockets 7, 385–397.Google Scholar
  42. Shorthill, R. W.: 1973, ‘Infrared Atlas Charts of the Eclipsed Moon’,The Moon, accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  43. Shorthill, R. W. and Saari, J. M.: 1965,Science 150, 210–212.Google Scholar
  44. Shorthill, R. W.et al.: 1970,Esclipse Cooling of Selected Lunar Features, The Boeing Company, Seattle, Washington (in preparation).Google Scholar
  45. Shorthill, R. W., Thompson, T. W., and Zisk, S. H.: 1972,The Moon 3, 313–317.Google Scholar
  46. Spurr, J. E.: 1948,Geology Applied to Selenography, The Rumford Press, Concord, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
  47. Sukhanov, A. L., Trifanov, V. G., and Florenskiy, P. V.: 1967, ‘Geologic and Plupiographic Mapping of the Moon and Some Structural Features of the Lunar Surface’,Geotectonics 5, 327–332, translated.Google Scholar
  48. Thompson, T. W.: 1968,Radar Studies of the Lunar Surface Emphasizing Factors Related to Selection of Landing Sites, Final Report, Research Report RS73, Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Thompson, T. W.: 1974,The Moon, this issue, p. 51.Google Scholar
  50. Thompson, T. W., Pollack, J. B., Campbell, M. J., and O'Leary, B. T.: 1970,Radio Sci. 5, 253–262.Google Scholar
  51. Trask, N. J.: 1967,Icarus 6, 270–276.Google Scholar
  52. Tyler, G. L.: 1968,J. Geophys. Res. 73, 7609–7620.Google Scholar
  53. Tyler, G. L. and Howard, H. T.: 1973, ‘Dual-Frequency Bi-Static Radar Investigation of Moon with Apollos 14 and 15’,J. Geophys. Res., accepted for publication.Google Scholar
  54. Tyler, G. L. and Simpson, R. A.: 1970,Radio Sci. 5, 263–271.Google Scholar
  55. Wilhelms, D. E.: 1970, ‘Summary of Lunar Stratigraphy - Telescopic Observations’,U.S. Geol. Survey, Prof. Paper 599-F, in press.Google Scholar
  56. Winter, D. F.: 1970,Radio Sci. 5, 229–240.Google Scholar
  57. Winter, D. F. and Saari, J. M.: 1969,Astron. J. 156, 1135–1157.Google Scholar
  58. Zisk, S. H., Carr, M. H., Masursky, H., Shorthill, R. W., and Thompson, T. W.: 1971,Science 173, 808–812.Google Scholar
  59. Zisk, S. H., Masursky, H., Milton, D. J., Schaber, G. G., Shorthill, R. W., and Thompson, T. W.: 1972, ‘Apollo 16 Landing Site: Summary of Earth-Based Remote Sensing Data’, NASA SP-315, pp. 29-105 to 29-110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht-Holland 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. W. Thompson
    • 1
  • H. Masursky
    • 2
  • R. W. Shorthill
    • 3
  • G. L. Tyler
    • 4
  • S. H. Zisk
    • 5
  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryPasadenaUSA
  2. 2.United States Geological SurveyflagstaffUSA
  3. 3.Boeing Aerospace CompanySeattleUSA
  4. 4.Stanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  5. 5.MIT Haystack ObservatoryWestfordUSA

Personalised recommendations