Marketing Letters

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 253–266 | Cite as

Internal analysis of market structure: Recent developments and future prospects

  • Terry Elrod


The predominant paradigm in marketing for explaining buyer choice behavior is that choices reflect buyer evaluations of the attributes possessed by alternatives. Internal market structure analysis seeks to recover the attributes, and the buyer evaluations of those attributes, that govern brand choices. This essay briefly reviews some of the most recent developments in internal market structure analysis and discusses prospects for further work.

Key words

Market Structure Analysis Multidimensional Unfolding Preference Choice 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. AllenbyGreg M. (1989). “A Unified Approach to Identifying, Estimating and Testing Demand Structures with Aggregate Scanner Data,”Marketing Science 8 (Summer), 265–280.Google Scholar
  2. Carroll, J. Douglas, Wayne, S. De, Sarbo, and Geert De Soete. (1988). “Stochastic Tree Unforlding (STUN) Models: Theory and Application,” In H. H.Bock (ed.),Classification and Related Methods of Data Analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland), 421–430.Google Scholar
  3. CarrollJ. Douglas, and GeertDeSoete (1990). “Fitting a Quasi-Poisson Case of the GSTUN (General Stochastic Tree UNfolding) Model and Some Extensions,” In MartinSchader and WolfgangGaul (eds.),Knowledge, Data and Computer-Assisted Decisions. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 93–102.Google Scholar
  4. CarrollJ. Douglas, PaulE. Green and CatherineM. Schaffer. (1986). “Interpoint Distance Comparisons in Correspondence Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (August), 271–280.Google Scholar
  5. CarrollJ. Douglas, PaulE. Green, and CatherineM. Schaffer. (1987). “Comparing Interpoint Distances in Correspondence Analysis: A Clarification,”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (November), 445–450.Google Scholar
  6. CarrollJ. Douglas, PaulE. Green, and CatherineM. Schaffer. (1989). “Reply to Greenacre's Commentary on the Carroll-Green-Schaffer Scaling of Two-Way Correspondence Analysis Solutions,”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (August), 366–368.Google Scholar
  7. CooperLee G. (1988). “Competitive Maps: The Structure Underlying Asymmetric Cross Elasticities,”Management Science 34 (June), 707–723.Google Scholar
  8. DeSarboWayne S. and JaewunCho. (1989). “A Stochastic Multidimensional Scaling Vector Threshold Model for the Spatial Representation of ‘Pick Any/N’ Data”,Psychometrika 54 (March, 105–130.Google Scholar
  9. DeSarboWayne S., GeertDeSoete, J. DouglasCarroll, and VenkatramRamaswamy. (1988). “A New Stochastic Ultrametric Tree Unfolding Methodology for Assessing Competitive Market Structure and Deriving Market Segments,”Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis 4, 185–204.Google Scholar
  10. DeSarboWayne S., GeertDeSoete, and JehoshuaEliashberg. (1987). “A New Stochastic Multidimensional Unfolding Model for the Investigation of Paired Comparison Consumer Preference/Choice Data,”Journal of Economic Psychology, 8, 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DeSarboWayne S., and DonnaL. Hoffman. (1986). “Simple and Weighted Unfolding Threshold Models for the Spatial Representation of Binary Choice Data,”Applied Psychological Measurement 10, (September), 247–264.Google Scholar
  12. DeSarboWayne S., RichardL. Oliver, and GeertDeSoete. (1986). “A Probabilistic Multidimensional Scaling Vector Model,”Applied Psychological Measurement 10 (March), 79–80.Google Scholar
  13. DeSarboWayne S. and VithalaR. Rao. (1986). “A Constrained Unfolding Methodology for Product Positioning,”Marketing Science 5 (Winter), 1–19.Google Scholar
  14. DeSoeteGeert and J. D.Carrol. (1983). “A Maximum Likelihood Method for Fitting the Wandering Vector Model,”Psychometrika 48 (December), 553–567.Google Scholar
  15. DeSoeteGeert, J. D.Carroll, and Wayne S.DeSarbo. (1986). “The Wandering Ideal Point Model: A Probabilistic Multidimensional Unfolding Model for Paired Comparisons Data,”Journal of Mathematical Psychology 30, 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DonthuNaveen and RolandT. Rust. (1989). “Estimating Geographic Customer Densities Using Kernel Density Estimation,”Marketing Science 8 (Spring), 191–203.Google Scholar
  17. ElrodTerry. (1988a). “Choice Map: Inferring a Product-Market Map From Panel Data,”Marketing Science 7 (Winter), 21–40.Google Scholar
  18. ElrodTerry. (1988b). “Inferring and Ideal-Point Product-Market Map from Consumer Panel Data.” In WolfgangGaul and MartinSchader (eds.),Data, Expert Knowledge and Decisions. Amsterdam: Springer-Verlag, 240–249.Google Scholar
  19. Elrod, Terry, and Russell S. Winer. (1991). “An Empirical Comparison of Mapping Methods Based on Panel Data,” working paper, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
  20. GreenacreMichael J. (1989). “The Carroll-Green-Schaffer Scaling in Correspondence analysis: A Theoretical and Empirical Appraisal,”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (August), 358–365.Google Scholar
  21. GroverRajiv and V.Srinivasan. (1987). “Simultaneous Approach to Market Segmentation and Market Structuring,”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (May), 139–153.Google Scholar
  22. HauserJohn R., and StevenM. Shugan. (1983). “Defensive Marketing Strategies,”Marketing Science 2 (Fall), 319–360.Google Scholar
  23. HoffmanDonna L. and GeorgeR. Franke. (1986). “Correspondence Analysis: Graphical Representation of Categorical Data in Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research 23 (August), 213–227.Google Scholar
  24. HolmanEric W. (1972). “The Relation Between Hierarchical and Euclidean Models for Psychological Distances,”Psychometrika 37 (December), 417–423.Google Scholar
  25. JainDipak, Frankm. Bass, and Yu-MinChen. (1990). “Estimation of Latent Class Models with Heterogeneous Choice Probabilities: An Application to Market Structuring,”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (Frbruary), 94–101.Google Scholar
  26. Jedidi, Kamel, and Wayne S. DeSarbo. (forthcoming). “A Stochastic Multidimensional Scaling Methodology for the Spatial Representation of Three-Mode, Three-Way Binary Data,”Psychometrika.Google Scholar
  27. KamakuraWagner A., and GaryJ. Russell. (1989). “A Probabilistic Choice Model for Market Segmentation and Elasticity Structure,”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (November), 379–390.Google Scholar
  28. KumarK. Ravi, an D.Sudharshan. (1988). “Defensive Marketing Strategies: An Equilibrium Analysis Based on Decoupled Response Function Models,”Management Science 34 (July), 805–815.Google Scholar
  29. LilienGary L., and PhilipKotler. (1983).Marketing Decision: A Model-Building Approach. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  30. LouviereJordan J., and GeorgeWoodworth. (1983). “Design and Analysis of Simulated Consumer Choice or Allocation Experiments: An Approach Based on Aggregate Data,”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (November), 350–367.Google Scholar
  31. MacKay, David B., and Cornelia Dröge. (forthcoming). “Extensions of Probabilistic Perceptual Maps with Implications for Competitive Positioning and Choice,”International Journal of Research in Marketing.Google Scholar
  32. MacKayDavid B., and JosephL. Zinnes. (1986). “Probabilistic Model for the Multidimensional Scaling of Proximity and Preference Data,”Marketing Science 5 (Fall), 325–344.Google Scholar
  33. MooreWilliam L. and RussellS. Winer. (1987). “A Panel-Data Based Method for Merging Joint Space and Market Response Function Estimation,”Marketing Science 6 (Winter), 25–42.Google Scholar
  34. RamaswamyVenkatram, and WayneS. DeSarbo. (1990). “SCULPTRE: A New Methodology for Deriving and Analyzing Hierarchical Product-Market Structures from Panel Data,”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (November), 418–427.Google Scholar
  35. Ritz, Zvi, and D., Sudharshan. (1986). “An Evolutionary Analysis of Product-Preference Structures: Toward Managerial Control,” In H. A.Eiset and G.Pederojj (eds.),Proccedings of Optimisation Days Conference, 1986, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. New York: Springer-Verlag, 326–342.Google Scholar
  36. RussellGary J., and RuthN. Bolton (1988). “Implications of Market Structure for Elasticity Structure,”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (August), 229–241.Google Scholar
  37. SudharshanD., JerroldH. May, and ThomasGruca. (1988). “DIFFSTRAT: An Analytical Procedure for Generating Optimal New Product Concepts for a Differentiated-type Strategy,”European Journal of Operational Research 36, 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. SudharshanD., JerroldH. May, and AllanD. Shocker. (1987). “A Simulation Comparison of Methods for New Product Location,”Marketing Science 6 (Spring), 182–201.Google Scholar
  39. ShuganSteven M. (1986b). “Estimating Brand Positioning Maps Using Supermarket Scanning Data,”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (February), 1–19.Google Scholar
  40. Winsberg, Suzanne, and J. Douglas, Carroll. (1988). “A Quasi-Nonmetric Method for Multidimensional Scaling via an Extended Euclidean Model,”Psychometrika 53 (June), 217–229.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. WinsbergSuzanne, and J. DouglasCarroll. (1989). “A Quasi-Nonmetric Method for Multidimensional Scaling of Multiway Data via a Restricted Case of an Extended INDISCAL Model,” In R.Coppi and S.Belasco (eds.),Multiway Data Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 405–414.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terry Elrod
    • 1
  1. 1.3-23 Faculty of BusinessUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations