Recognizing the fact that the effective driving force (ΔK eff) determines the fatigue crack propagation (FCP) rate and that the shear strain, which is considered to develop due to an occurrence of crack closure, primarily contributes to the plastic deformation, an effort is made here to elucidate the role of plastic deformation in FCP by developing a correlation between the ΔK eff and the applied driving force (ΔK) with shear strain as variable. The effect of the degree of plastic deformation (i.e. shear strain level) on the FCP rates at higher values of ΔK, where ΔK eff approaches ΔK, approaching the Paris regime, appears minimal. On the other hand, the disparity between ΔK eff and ΔK, which apparently increases with shear strain level, persists at lower values of ΔK. This suggests a strong influence of the degree of localized deformation on the FCP rates in the near threshold level. Hence, an improvement of FCP rates in the near threshold level should follow an effort that promotes the plastic deformation near the crack tip to a greater degree. This approach could, therefore, form the basis to explain the effect of the grain size, microstructure, environment,R-ratio and crack size on the near-threshold FCP rates.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
C. Laird, in “Fatigue Crack Propagation”, ASTM STP 415 (Americal Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1966) p. 131.
W. Elber, Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM STP 486 (Americal Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1971) p. 280.
S. Suresh andR. O. Ritchie,Met. Trans. 13A (1982) 1627.
D. R. Williams, D. L. Davidson andJ. Lankford,Exp. Mech. 20 (1980) 134.
P. K. Mazumdar andS. Jeelani, submitted for publication.
J. R. Rice, in “Fatigue Crack Propagation”, ASTM STP 415 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1966) p. 247.
T. T. Shih andR. P. Wei,Eng. Fract. Mech. 6 (1974) 19.
J. L. Tzou, S. Suresh andR. O. Ritchie; “Fatigue Crack Propagation in Viscous Environments”, University of California, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL-15780 (March 1983).
J. Morrow, “Internal Friction, Damping and cyclic plasticity”, ASTM STP 378 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1965) p. 45.
D. L. Davidson andJ. Lankford, “Fatigue Mechanisms: Advances in quantative Measurement of Physical Damage”, ASTM STP 811 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1983) p. 371.
P. C. Paris andH. H. Johnson,Eng. Fract. Mech. 1 (1968) 3.
J. Lankford,Fatigue Eng. Mater. Struct. 6 (1983) 15.
H. Mughrabi,Mater. Sci. Eng. 33 (1978) 207.
C. Laird, “Mechanisms and Theories of Fatigue”, (American Society for Metals, Ohio, 1979) p. 149.
J. C. Figueroa, S. P. Bhat, R. De La Veaux, S. Murzenski andC. Laird,Acta Metall. 29 (1981) 1667.
S. Jeelani, PhD thesis, North Carolina State University (1975).
S. Jeelani andK. Ramakrishnan,Wear 81 (1982) 263.
About this article
Cite this article
Mazumdar, P.K., Jeelani, S. Plastic deformation — its role in fatigue crack propagation. J Mater Sci 21, 3611–3614 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00553807
- Plastic Deformation
- Shear Strain
- Threshold Level