Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 4015–4020 | Cite as

Jute-reinforced polyester composites

  • P. J. Roe
  • M. P. Ansell
Papers

Abstract

Raw jute fibre has been incorporated in a polyester resin matrix to form uniaxially reinforced composites containing up to 60 vol% fibre. The tensile strength and Young's modulus, work of fracture determined by Charpy impact and inter-laminar shear strength have been measured as a function of fibre volume fraction. These properties all follow a Rule of Mixtures relationship with the volume fraction of jute. Derived fibre strength and Young's modulus were calculated as 442 MN m−2 and 55.5 GN m−2 respectively. Polyester resin forms an intimate bond with jute fibres up to a volume fraction of 0.6, above which the quantity of resin is insufficient to wet fibres completely. At this volume fraction the Young's modulus of the composite is approximately 35 GN m−2, the tensile strength is 250 MN m−2, the work of fracture is 22 kJ m−2 and the inter-laminar shear strength is 24 MN m−2. The properties of jute and glass fibres are compared, and on a weight and cost basis jute fibres are seen in many respects to be superior to glass fibres as a composite reinforcement.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. S. Learmonth, in “Fillers for Plastics”, edited by W. C. Wake (Iliffe, London, 1971) p. 81.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. N. Bhattacharyya, I. B. Chakraverti andS. R. Sen Gupta,J. Sci. Ind. Res. 20D, May (1961) p. 192.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. R. Philip,Reinforced Plastics, June (1964) 306.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Wells, D. H. Bowen, I. Machphail andP. K. Pal, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Technical Conference of the Reinforced Plastics and Composites Institute, 1980 (Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc, New York, 1980) Section 1-F.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. K. Chawla andA. C. Bastos, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on the Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, Vol. 3 Cambridge (1979), (Pergamon Press) p. 191.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. N. Shah andS. C. Lakkad,Fibre Sci. Tech. 15 (1981) 41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. G. Winfield andB. L. Winfield, “Fillers and Reinforcements for Plastics”, edited by R. D. Deanin and N. R. Schott, Advances in Chemistry Series 134 (American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1974) p. 207.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. G. Winfield,Plastics Rubber Int. 4 (1979) 23.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ASTM D2344 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1976).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. A. Sattar andD. H. Kellog, ASTM STP 460 (Americal Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1969) p. 62.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. A. Berg, J. Tirosh andM. Israeli, ASTM STP 497 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1972) p. 206.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. M. Jones, “Mechanics of Composite Materials” (Scripta, Washington DC, 1975), p. 3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    R. A. Clark andM. P. Ansell,J. Mater. Sci., to be published.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Kabir,Textile Horizons 4, May (1984) p. 20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. J. Roe
    • 1
  • M. P. Ansell
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Materials ScienceUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations