Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 21, Issue 8, pp 2787–2792 | Cite as

The surface tension of liquid pure aluminium and aluminium-magnesium alloy

  • C. Garcia-Cordovilla
  • E. Louis
  • A. Pamies


This paper discusses the results of several experiments designed to further illustrate the recent findings of the present authors according to which, if a virtually leak-fee maximum bubble pressure system is used to measure the surface tension of liquid aluminium, a surface tension around 1100 mJ m−2 is first obtained, decreasing to the oxidized value (around 865 mJ m−2) as the experiment proceeds and oxygen enters the system mainly through the capillary walls. The peculiarities and difficulties inherent to the maximum bubble pressure method are illustrated. For instance, a study of the time needed for the surface tension to decrease to the oxidized value as a function of temperature reveals the important role played by the vapour pressure in the process. This is further illustrated by considering Al-Mg alloys, as magnesium has a different heat of vaporization and a much larger vapour pressure than aluminium at the measuring temperatures. Results for the changes in density and surface tension for the oxidized and unoxidized cases induced by magnesium (up to 8 wt%) are also presented and compared to previous data.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L. Goumiri and J. C. Joud, Acta Metall. 30 (1982) 1397 and references therein.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Pamies, C. Garcia-Cordovilla and E. Louis, Scripta Metall. 18 (1984) 869.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Lang, Aluminium 49 (1973) 231 and references therein.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. G. White, Metall. Rev. 13 (1968) 73.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. C. Allen, in “Liquid Metals” edited by S. Z. Beer (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1972) p. 161.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. D. Hondros, in “Physicochemical Measurements in Metals Research”, Vol. IV, Part 2, edited by R. A. Rapp (Interscience, Wiley, New York, 1970) pp. 293–348.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Lang, J. Inst. Met. 101 (1973) 300.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Idem, Aluminium 50 (1974) 731.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Cantor, Ann. Physik 283 (1982) 399.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Shrödinger, ibid. 46 (1915) 413.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. E. Honig and D. A. Kramer, in “Physicochemical Measurements in Metals Research”, Vol. IV, Part 1, edited by R. A. Rapp (Interscience Wiley, New York, 1970) pp. 505–531.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. J. Smithells, (ed), in “Metals Reference Book” 5th Ed. (Butterworths, London, 1976) p. 231.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    L. I. Maissel and R. Glang, (eds), in “Handbook of Thin Film Technology” (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970) pp. 2–39.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Chacón, F. Flores and G. Navascues, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 14 (1984) 1587.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. M. Korol'kov, Otdelenie, Teknicheskik Nauk 2 (1965) 35.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E. Pelzel, Berg.-u. Hütternmänn Monatsh. Leoben 93 247.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Idem ibid. 94 (1949) 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Garcia-Cordovilla
    • 1
  • E. Louis
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Pamies
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro de Investigacón y DesarrolloEmpresa Nacional del AluminoAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de FisicaUniversidad de AlicanteAlicanteSpain

Personalised recommendations