Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 18, Issue 9, pp 2671–2678 | Cite as

Effect of heat treatment temperature (HTT) on density, weight and volume of glass-like carbon (GC)

  • Bhola N. Mehrotra
  • R. H. Bragg
  • A. S. Rao
Papers

Abstract

Room temperature measurements have been made of the density, weight and linear dimensions of glass-like carbon (GC) that was heat treated in the temperature range of 1000 to 2700‡ C for three hours in inert gas atmosphere. The density of GC decreased with increase in heat treatment temperature (HTT), reaching a maximum decrease of 12.4% at 2700‡ C; and the weight loss increased with increasing temperature to a maximum of about 1.9%. The volume increased and showed a quadratic dependence on the HTT, reaching a maximum value of about 10.2%. Subsequent application of hydrostatic pressures up to 1551 MPa (225 000 psi) produced only a small increase in bulk density. It is concluded that the weight loss is not the major cause of the density decrease, instead the volume expansion of pores is mainly responsible for this behaviour. The weight loss is suggested to be due to the release of the last vestiges of hydrogen and the volume expansion is shown to be due to two different mechanisms operating in different temperature regimes. A gas pressure mechanism is predominant up to the HTT of 1600‡ C and at greater HTT thermal stress mechanism predominates. The irreversibility of the dimensional change is proposed to be due to the ratchet-like [1] nature of microstructure that is developed during heating of the GC.

Keywords

Bulk Density Thermal Stress Hydrostatic Pressure Temperature Regime Volume Expansion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    C. E. Holcombe, High Temp. Sci. 12 (1980) 63.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Furuta, Y. Sanada and H. Honda, Carbon 7 (1969) 510.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Böder and G. Bühlmayer, Carbon '72 3 (1972) 247.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Fitzer, W. Schaefer and S. Yamada, Carbon 7 (1969) 643.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Bose, U. Dahmen, R. H. Bragg and G. Thomas, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 61 (1978) 174.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. B. Fischbach and M. E. Rorabaugh, High Temp. High Pressure 9 (1977) 199.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. M. Collins, Proceedings of the 1st and 2nd Conferences on Carbon, Buffalo, New York, November 1953 and June 1955 (American Carbon Society, The University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, 1956) p. 177.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Letizia, High Temp. High Pressure 9 (1977) 291.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Fitzer and H. P. Janoschek, ibid. 9 (1977) 243.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Idem, ibid. 10 (1978) 527.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. H. Wagner, W. Hammer and G. Wilhelmi, ibid. 13 (1981) 153.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. H. Bragg and S. Bose, 14th Biennial Carbon Conference, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA, June 1979 (American Carbon Society, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 1979) p. 189.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Boas and R. W. K. Honeycombe, Proc. Roy. Soc. A188 (1947) 427.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. R. Buessem, in “Mechanical Properties of Engineering Ceramics”, edited by W. W. Kriegel and H. Palmour (Interscience, New York, 1961) p. 127.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. G. Naum and C. K. Jun, J. Appl. Phys. 41 (1970) 5092.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. R. Koenig, MSc thesis, Ohio State University (1972).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. B. Anderson and P. H. Emmett, J. Phys. Chem. 56 (1952) 753.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. P. Redmond and P. L. Walker Jr, Nature 186 (1960) 72.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. T. Meyer, A. W. Lynch, J. M. Freese, M. C. Smith and R. J. Imprescia, Carbon 11 (1973) 258.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. L. Lieberman, ibid. 9 (1971) 345.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. V. Kotlensky and D. B. Fischbach, NASA Technical Report 65-13554 (JPL 32-842) Pasadena CA, USA (1965).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    B. T. Kelly and R. B. Taylor, Chem. Phys. Carbon 10 (1973) 26.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. D. Kingery, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 38 (1955) 3.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. J. Gangler, ibid. 33 (1950) 367.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. M. Jenkins and K. Kawamura, “Polymeric Carbons, Carbon Fibre, Glass, and Char” (Cambridge University Press, London, 1976) pp. 83–131.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S. Sato, K. Kawamata, H. Awaji, M. Osawa and M. Manaka, Carbon 19 (1981) 111.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. E. Blendell and R. L. Coble, J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 65 (1982) 174.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A. G. Evans, Acta Metall 26 (1978) 1845.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Natarajan, A. R. Das and C. N. R. Rao, Trans. Faraday Soc. 65 (1969) 3081.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. Mrozowski, Proceedings of the 1st and 2nd Conferences on Carbon, Buffalo, New York, November 1953 and June 1955 (American Carbon Society, The University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, 1956) p.31.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. F. Baker, Private communication (1981).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. L. Sutton and V. C. Howard, J. Nuclear Mater. 7 (1972) 58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall Ltd. 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhola N. Mehrotra
    • 1
  • R. H. Bragg
    • 1
  • A. S. Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Materials and Molecular Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and Department of Materials Science and Mineral EngineeringUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations