Chemically deposited n-CdSe thin film photo-electrochemical cells: effects of Zn2+-modification
- 86 Downloads
- 12 Citations
Abstract
The photoelectrochemical solar cell properties of chemically deposited n-CdSe films were studied before and after Zn2+ surface modification. It was shown that the surface properties underwent conceivable changes after Zn2+ treatment. The current-voltage characteristics in the dark showed a significant decrease in reverse saturation current density, J0, from 5.4×10−7 to 1.2×10−9 A cm−2 and in ideality factor, n, from 2.46 to 1.27. Under AM1 illumination, other parameters have been found to be considerably enchanced, e.g. the open-circuit photovoltage, Voc, increased from 0.53 to 0.85 V with respect to SCE; the short-circuit photocurrent density, Jsc, from 2.62 to 8.35 mA cm−2; fill factor from 0.38 to 0.62 and the minority carrier diffusion length, Lp, from 0.16 to 0.22 μm. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic data on the Zn2+-modified CdSe showed the formation of metallic Zn islets and a thin layer of SeO2 on the surface. All these important improvements of the CdSe PEC properties may be attributed to the redistribution of active interface states within the band gap due to strong interaction of the electrodepositive Zn2+ ions. Support for these observations were obtained by sub-band gap response studies, contact potential difference measurements in N2 ambient and the estimation of the surface recombination velocities before and after modification.
Keywords
SeO2 Photocurrent Density Contact Potential Difference Surface Recombination Velocity Saturation Current DensityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.
- 2.A. Heller, Accts. Chem. Res. 14 (1981) 154.Google Scholar
- 3.
- 4.B. J. Tufts, I. L. Abrahams, P. G. Santangelo, G. N. Ryba, L. G. Casagrande and N. S. Lewis, Nature 326 (1987) 861.Google Scholar
- 5.O. Savadogo, Can. J. Chem. 67 (1989) 382.Google Scholar
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.D. N. Bose, M. S. Hegde, S. Basu and K. C. Mandal, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 4 (1989) 866.Google Scholar
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.R. Tenne, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 85 (1981) 413.Google Scholar
- 15.
- 16.K. C. Mandal, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 9 (1990) 1203.Google Scholar
- 17.
- 18.W. Wallace, R. N. Noufi and S. K. Deb, in Proceedings of the 15th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Florida (1981) p. 1363.Google Scholar
- 19.G. Hodes, Nature 29 (1980) 285.Google Scholar
- 20.
- 21.M. A. Russak, J. Reichman, H. Witzke, S. K. Deb and S. N. Chen, J. Electrochem. Soc. 127 (1980) 725.Google Scholar
- 22.W. W. Gartner, Phys. Rev. 116 (1959) 84.Google Scholar
- 23.
- 24.R. J. Nelson, J. S. Williams, H. J. Leamy, B. Miller, H. C. Casey, Jr., B. A. Parkinson and A. Heller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 36 (1980) 76.Google Scholar
- 25.
- 26.D. E. Aspnes, Surf. Sci. 132 (1983) 406.Google Scholar
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.C. D. Wagner, W. M. Riggs, L. E. Davis, J. F. Moulder and G. E. Muilenberg, (editors) in “Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy”, (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, USA, 1977).Google Scholar
- 30.F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson, in “Advanced Inorganic Chemistry”, 3rd Edn, (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1972) p. 427.Google Scholar
- 31.R. N. Noufi, P. A. Kohl, J. W. Cers, Jr., J. M. White and A. J. Bard, J. Electrochem. Soc. 126 (1979) 949.Google Scholar
- 32.