Rheumatology International

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 145–148 | Cite as

The visual analogue scale: Its use in pain measurement

  • G. B. Langley
  • H. Sheppeard


Use of pain rating scales, especially the visual analogue scale (VAS), has increased dramatically in the last decade. Consideration of the VAS in terms of its physical structure and the patient's behaviour when confronted with the scale, casts doubt on its validity. It is nonlinear and prone to bias which limits its use as a serial measure of pain severity. Measuring pain intensity alone imposes further limitations. The McGill Pain Questionnaire measuring several dimensions of pain appears to be a better alternative.

Key words

Visual analogue scale Pain measurement 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Pickup ME, Wright V (1978) The visual analogue scale in the assessment of grip strength. Ann Rheum Dis 37:382–384Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huskisson EC (1982) Measurement of pain. J Rheumatol 9:768–769Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Revill SI, Robinson JO, Rosen M, Hogg MIJ (1976) The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 31:1191–1198Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet II:1127–1131Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scott J, Huskisson EC (1979) Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann Rheum Dis 38:560Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hardy JD, Wolff HG, Goodell H (1952) Pain sensations and reactions. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carlsson AM (1983) Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain 16:87–101Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huskisson EC (1976) Assessment for clinical trials. Clin Rheum Dis 2:37–49Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poulton EC (1968) The new psychophysics: six models for magnitude estimation. Psychol Bull 69:1–19Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott J, Huskisson EC (1979) Accuracy of subjective measurements made with or without previous scores: an important source of error in serial measurement of subjective states. Ann Rheum Dis 38:558–559Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scott J, Huskisson EC (1976) Graphic representation of pain. Pain 2:175–184Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohnhaus EE, Adler R (1975) Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1:379–384Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stevens SS, Galanter EH (1975) Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. J Exp Psychol 54:377–411Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stevens JC (1958) Stimulus spacing and the judgement of loudness. J Exp Psychol 56:246–250Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gracely RH (1979) Psychophysical assessment of human pain. In: Bonica JJ, Liebeskind JC, Albe-Fessard DG (eds) Advances in pain research and therapy. Raven, New York, pp 805–824Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fowles M, Langley GB, Simms R, Sirett P, Vlieg M, Wigley RD (1982) Comparative effects of piroxicam and naproxen after missed dosage. International Symposium of the Management of the Arthritides, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Houde RW (1982) Methods for measuring clinical pain in humans. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (Suppl) 74:25–29Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Grossi E, Borghi C, Cerchiari EL, Della Puppa T, Francucci B (1983) Analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS): a new method for pain assessment. Clin Exp Rheum 1:337–340Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Langley GB, Sheppeard H (1984) Problems associated with pain measurement: comparison of the visual analogue and verbal rating scales. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2:231–234Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woodforde JM, Merskey H (1972) Some relationships between subjective measures of pain. J Psychosom Res 16:173–178Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37:378–381Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Melzack R, Torgerson WS (1971) On the language of pain. Anaesthesiology 34:50–59Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Melzack R (1975) The McGill pain questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1:277–299Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gracely RH, McGrath P, Dubner R (1978) Validity and sensitivity of ratio scales of sensory and affective verbal pain descriptors: manipulation of affect by diazepam. Pain 5:19–29Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Burckhardt CS (1984) The use of the McGill pain questionnaire in assessing arthritis pain. Pain 19:305–314Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Reading AE (1983) The McGill pain questionnaire: an appraisal. In: Melzack R (ed) Pain measurement and assessment. Raven, New York, pp 55–61Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. B. Langley
    • 1
  • H. Sheppeard
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Research LaboratoryPublic HospitalPalmerston NorthNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations