Advertisement

Oecologia

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 310–317 | Cite as

The energetic costs of tail autotomy to reproduction in the lizard Coleonyx brevis (Sauria: Gekkonidae)

  • Benjamin E. Dial
  • Lloyd C. Fitzpatrick
Article

Summary

Energy reserve utilization and energy budgets were compared in tailed and tailless adult female Coleonyx brevis. Carcass, fat body and caudal energy reserves were used for vitellogenesis; mass and energy content (cal/mg and/or cal/reserve) of each were significantly lower at oviposition than at the initiation of vitellogenesis. Total energy reserves accounted for 53% of the reproductive energy investment in tailed females compared to 29% in tailless females. Tailed females had over twice as many reserve calories for egg production than tailless females. Caudal energy reserves represented 60% of the total reserves of tailed females and were one-third greater than the total energy reserves of tailless females. To produce a clutch of eggs both tailed and tailless females supplemented energy reserves with net metabolizable energy that was available after metabolic costs were paid. Tailless females had a significantly greater rate of food ingestion and more net metabolizable energy available for reproduction than tailed females, yet allocated significantly fewer calories/day to reproduction than tailed females, primarily because of the loss of caudal reserves. Reproductive efforts of tailed and tailless females were equivalent. However, the loss of caudal reserves resulted in the production of eggs that were significantly lower in mass and energy content (cal/mg and cal/egg) than when caudal reserves were used. Results empirically support the hypothesis that reproduction has energetic priority over tail regeneration in short-lived, iteroparous species with a low probability of future reproductive success.

Keywords

Reproductive Success Energy Content Energy Budget Reproductive Effort Energy Reserve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews RM (1979) Reproductive effort of female Anolis limifrons (Sauria: Iguanidae). Copeia 1979:620–626Google Scholar
  2. Ballinger RE (1973) Experimental evidence of the tail as a balancing organ in the lizard, Anolis carolinensis. Herpetologica 29:65–66Google Scholar
  3. Ballinger RE (1977) Reporductive strategies: Food availability as a source of proximal variation in a lizard. Ecology 58:628–635Google Scholar
  4. Bartholomew GA (1972) Energy metabolism. In: MS Gordon (ed), Animal physiology: Principles and adaptations. The Macmillan Company, New York p 44–72Google Scholar
  5. Bennett AF, Dawson WR (1976) Metabolism. In: C Gans, WR Dawson (eds) Biology of the Reptilia Vol 5, (Physiology A). Academic Press, New York p 127–223Google Scholar
  6. Brody S (1945) Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown AV, Fitzpatrick LC (1978) Life history and population energetics of the Dobson Fly, Corydalus cornutum Ecology 59:1091–1108Google Scholar
  8. Brown CK, Ruby DE (1977) Sex-associated variation in the frequencies of tail autotomy in Sceloporus jarrovi (Sauria: Iguanidae) at different elevations. Herpetologica 33:380–387Google Scholar
  9. Bustard HR (1967) Gekkonid lizards adapt fat storage to desert environments. Science 158:1197–1198Google Scholar
  10. Clark DR (1971) The strategy of tail autotomy in the ground skink, Lygosoma laterale. J Exp Zool 176:295–302Google Scholar
  11. Cody ML (1966) A general theory of clutch size. Evolution 20:174–184Google Scholar
  12. Congdon JD (1977) Energetics of the montane lizard Sceloporus jarrovi: A measure of reproductive effort. Ph D diss Arizona State University, Tempe pp 110Google Scholar
  13. Congdon JD, Vitt LJ, Hadley NF (1978) Parental investment: Comparative reproductive energetics in bisexual and unisexual lizards, genus Cnemidophorus. Am Nat 112:509–521Google Scholar
  14. Congdon, JD, Vitt LJ, King WW (1974) Geckos: Adaptive significance and energetics of tail autotomy. Science 184:1379–1380Google Scholar
  15. Crump ML, Kaplan RH (1979) Clutch energy partitioning of tropical tree frogs (Hylidae) Copeia 1979:626–635Google Scholar
  16. Derickson WK (1976) Lipid storage and utilization in reptiles. Am Zool 16:711–723Google Scholar
  17. Dial BE (1975) Aspects of the ecology and systematics of the lizards Coleonyx brevis and Coleonyx reticulatus (Lacertilia: Gekkonidae). MS thesis Texas A & M University, College Station pp 211Google Scholar
  18. Dial BE (1978)a Aspects of the behavioral ecology of two Chihuahuan Desert geckos (Reptilia, Lacertilia, Gekkonidae). J Herpetol 12:209–216Google Scholar
  19. Dial BE (1978)b The thermal ecology of two sympatric, nocturnal Coleonyx (Lacertilia: Gekkonidae) Herpetologica 34:194–201Google Scholar
  20. Edmunds M (1974) Defense in animals: A survey of anti-predator defenses. Longmas, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Etheridge R (1967) Lizard caudal vertebrae. Copeia 1967:699–721Google Scholar
  22. Ferguson GW, Bohlen CH (1978) Demographic analysis: A tool for the study of natural selection of behavioural traits. In: Greenberg N, Maclean PD (eds), Behavior and neurology of lizards: An interdisciplinary colloquium. DHEW Publ No (ADM) 77–491, NIMH, Rockville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferguson GW, Brockman, T (1980) Geographic differences of growth rate of Sceloporus lizards (Sauria: Iguanidae) Copeia 1980:259–264Google Scholar
  24. Fisher, RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford, (reprinted, Dover, New York, 1958)Google Scholar
  25. Fitzpatrick LC (1973) Energy allocation in the Allegheny Mountain salamander, Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Ecol Monogr 43:43–58Google Scholar
  26. Greene HW (1969) Fat storage in females of an introduced lizard, Hemidactylus turcicus, from Texas Texas J Sci 21:233–235Google Scholar
  27. Hahn WE, Tinkle DW (1965) Fat body cycling and experimental evidence for its adaptive significance to ovarian follicle development in the lizard Uta stansburiana. J Exp Zool 158:79–86Google Scholar
  28. Hirshfield MF (1980) An experimental analysis of reproductive effort and cost in the Japanese medaka, Oryzias latipes. Ecology 61:282–292Google Scholar
  29. Hirshfield MF, Tinkle DW (1975) Natural selecion and the evolution of reproductive effort. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 72:2227–2231Google Scholar
  30. Hughes A, New D (1959) Tail regeneration in the gekkonid lizard Sphaerodactylus. J Embryol Exp Morphol 7:281–302Google Scholar
  31. Johnson JA, Brodie ED (1974) Defensive behaviour of the western banded gecko, Coleonyx variegatus. Anim Behav 22:684–687Google Scholar
  32. Johnson RN, Lillywhite HB (1979) Digestive efficiency of the omnivorous lizard Klauberina riversiana. Copeia 1979:431–437Google Scholar
  33. Kaplan RH (1980a) Ontogenetic energetics in Ambystoma, Physiol Zool 53:43–56Google Scholar
  34. Kaplan RH (1980b) The implications of ovum size variability for offspring fitness and clutch size within several populations of salamanders (Ambystoma) Evolution 34:51–64Google Scholar
  35. Licht P, Gorman GC (1970) Reproductive and fat cycles in Caribbean Anolis lizards. Univ Calif Publ Zool 95:1–52Google Scholar
  36. Maiorana VC (1977) Tail autotomy, functional conflicts and their resolution by a salamander. Nature 265:533–535Google Scholar
  37. Moffat LA, Bellairs ADA (1964) The regenerative capacity of the tail in embryonic and post-natal lizards (Lacerta vivipara) J Embryol Exp Morphol 12:769–786Google Scholar
  38. Murphy GI (1968) Pattern in life history and the environment. Am Nat 102:391–403Google Scholar
  39. Paine RT (1971) The measurement and application of the calorie to ecological problems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2:145–164Google Scholar
  40. Phillipson J (1964) A miniature bomb calorimeter for small biological samples Oikos 15:130–139Google Scholar
  41. Pianka ER (1969) Sympatry of desert lizards (Ctenotus) in western Australia. Ecology 50:1012–1030Google Scholar
  42. Pianka ER (1976) Natural selection of optimal reproductive tactics. Am Zool 16:775–784Google Scholar
  43. Pond CM (1978) Morphological aspects and the ecological and mechanical consequences of fat deposition in wild vertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:519–570Google Scholar
  44. Price PW (1974) Strategies for egg production. Evolution 28:76–84Google Scholar
  45. Randolph PA, Randolph JC, Barlow CA (1975) Age-specific energetics of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon piscum. Ecology 56:359–369Google Scholar
  46. Randolph PA, Randolph JC, Mattingly K, Foster MM (1977) Energy costs of reproduction in the cotton rat., Sigmodon hispidus Ecology 58:31–45Google Scholar
  47. Schaffer WM (1974) Selection for optimal life histories: The effects of age structure. Ecology 55:291–303Google Scholar
  48. Schoener TW, Schoener A (1980) Ecological and demographic correlates of injury rates in some Bahamian Anolis lizards. Copeia 1980:839–850Google Scholar
  49. Shaffer HB (1978) Relative predation pressure on salamanders (Caudata: Plethodontidae) along an altitudinal transect in Guatemala. Copeia 1978:268–272Google Scholar
  50. Smith CC, Fretwell (1974) The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am Nat 108:499–506Google Scholar
  51. Smith HM (1946) Handbook of lizards. Comstock Publ Co, Ithaca, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Smyth M (1974) Changes in the fat stores of the skinks Morethia boulengeri and Hemiergis peronii (Lacertilia). Aust J Zool 22:135–145Google Scholar
  53. Sokal RF, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, San Francisco, CA pp 776Google Scholar
  54. Stearns SC (1976) Life history tactics: A review of the ideas. Q Rev Biol 51:3–47Google Scholar
  55. Stearns SC (1977) The evolution of life history traits: A critique of the theory and a review of the data. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 8:145–171Google Scholar
  56. Tinkle DW (1969) The concept of reproductive effort and its relation to the evolution of life histories of lizards. Am Nat 103:501–516Google Scholar
  57. Tinkle DW, Hadley NF (1975) Lizard reproductive effort: Caloric estimates and comments on its evolution. Ecology 56:427–434Google Scholar
  58. Urban EK (1965) Quantitative study of locomotion in teiid lizards. Anim Behav 13:513–529Google Scholar
  59. Vitt LJ (1974) Winter aggregations, size classes, and relative tail breaks in the tree lizard, Urosaurus ornatus (Sauria: Iguanidae). Herpetologica 30:182–183Google Scholar
  60. Vitt LJ, Congdon JD, Dickson NA (1977) Adaptive strategies and energetics of tail autotomy in lizards. Ecology 58:326–337Google Scholar
  61. Vitt LJ, Congdon JD, Hulse AC, Platz JE (1974) Territorial aggressive encounters and tail breaks in the lizard Sceloporus magister. Copeia 1974:990–993Google Scholar
  62. Wake DB, Dresner IG (1967) Functional morphology and evolution of tail autotomy in salamanders. J Morphol 22:265–306Google Scholar
  63. Werner YL (1968) Regeneration frequencies in geckos of two ecological types (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Vie Milieu Ser C 19:199–222Google Scholar
  64. Wilbur HM (1977) Propagule size, number, and dispersion pattern in Ambystoma and Asclepias. Am Nat 111:43–68Google Scholar
  65. Williams GC (1966 a) Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press. Princeton, New Jersey pp 307Google Scholar
  66. Williams GC (1966 b) Natural selection, the costs of reproduction, and a refinement of Lack's principle. Am Nat 100:687–692Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin E. Dial
    • 1
  • Lloyd C. Fitzpatrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesNorth Texas State UniversityDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations