Internationales Archiv für Arbeitsmedizin

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 323–328 | Cite as

Post-mortem findings and clinical signs of dimethyl mercury poisoning in man

  • Jana Pazderová
  • A. Jirásek
  • M. Mráz
  • J. Pechan


A lethal dimethyl mercury poisoning was described in a 28-year-old chemist who had prepared 6000 g of this compound in the laboratory. Numbness and tingling of the lips, hands, and feet developed, as well as ataxia, disturbance of speech, concentric constriction of the visual fields, and signs of upper motor neurone lesion. There was no damage to peripheral nerves either in clinical or EMG examination. The spontaneous daily Hg excretion in urine was 124 to 142 Μg Hg/day. The amount of eliminated mercury was not changed by administration of dimercaptopropanole nor by peritoneal dialysis. Penicillamine, administered at 750 mg/day, increased excretion to 535 Μg Hg/day, but with no noticeable clinical effect. Total mercury levels (in Μg Hg/g wet weight) were found in various organs as fallows: brain 13.2 to 14.2, kidney 25.6, liver 26.8, spleen 5.4, and muscle 4.67. On post-mortem examination, symmetrical lesions in the cerebral cortex were found, particulary in the calcarine area. In the cerebellar cortex there was primarily a loss of Purkinje cells. The brain stem and anterior horns of the spinal cord also showed a moderate degree of damage.

Key words

Dimethyl mercury Poisoning Brain damage 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Berglund, F., Berlin, M., Birke, G.: Methyl mercury in fish. A toxicologic-epidemiologic evaluation of risks. Report from an expert group. Nordisk hygienisk tidskrift, Suppl. 4, Stockholm (1971)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frankland, Duppa, J.: In: J. J. G. Pric, A. E. H. Sonnen, J. L. Sloof, Organic mercury poisoning I. and II. Proceedings, Series C, 70, 152–186 (1967)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gage, J. V., Warren, J. M.: The determination of mercury and organic mercurials in biological samples. Ann. occup. Hyg. 13, 115–123 (1970)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hay, W. J., Rickards, A. G., Mc Menemey, W. H., Cumings, J. N.: Organic mercurial encephalopathy. J. Neurolog. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 26, 199–202 (1963)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hunter, D., Bromford, R. R., Russel, D. S.: Poisoning by methyl mercury compounds. Quart. J. Med. 33, 193–213 (1940)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hunter, D., Russel, D. S.: Focal cerebral atrophy in a human subject due to organic mercury compounds. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 17, 235–241 (1954)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jalili, M. A., Abbasi, A. H.: Poisoning by ethyl mercury toluene sulphoanilide. Brit. J. industr. Med. 18, 303–308 (1961)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prick, J. J. G., Sonnen, A. E. H., Sloof, J. L.: Organic mercury poisoning I. and II. Proceedings, Series C, 70, 152–186 (1967)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana Pazderová
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. Jirásek
    • 1
  • M. Mráz
    • 1
  • J. Pechan
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology Department of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Diseases,and Research Department of Industrial Neurology Charles UniversityClinic of Occupational Diseases Charles University Hlava's Patological Anatomical Institute Charles UniversityPrague
  2. 2.Klinika nemoci z povolániPraha 2Czechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations