Introduction to the Symposium on bistable and sensitizing pigments in vision

Almagor, E., Hillman, P., Minke, B.: Upper limit on translational diffusion of visual pigment in intact, unfixed barnacle photoreceptors. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 243–248 (1979)Google Scholar

Atzmon, Z., Hillman, P., Hochstein, S.: Visual response in barnacle photoreceptors is not initiated by transitions to and from metarhodopsin. Nature 274, 74–76 (1978)Google Scholar

Atzmon, Z., Hochstein, S., Hillman, P.: Transduction in photoreceptors: Determination of pigment transition or state coupled to excitation. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 249–253 (1979)Google Scholar

Barnes, S. N., Goldsmith, T. H.: Dark adaptation sensitivity and rhodopsin level in the eye of the lobster, Homarus. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 120, 143–159 (1977)Google Scholar

Brown, H. M., Cornwall, M. C.: Ionic mechanism of a quasi-stable depolarization in barnacle photoreceptors following red light. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 248, 579–593 (1975)Google Scholar

Cosens, D.: Blue adaptation: an experimental tool for studying behaviour of Drosophila. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 211–222 (1979)Google Scholar

Franceschini, N.: Bi-stable and photostable pigments in fly photoreceptor cells: Evidence from “ommatidial fundus fluoroscopy”. Science (in press)Google Scholar

Hamdorf, K., Razmjoo, S.: Prolonged depolarizing after-potential and its contribution to understanding of photoreceptor function. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 3, 163–170 (1977)Google Scholar

Hamdorf, K., Razmjoo, S.: Photoconvertible pigment states and excitation in Calliphora. The induction and properties of the prolonged depolarizing after-potential. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 137–161 (1979)Google Scholar

Hanani, M., Hillman, P.: Light absorption by metarhodopsin modifies the effect of a conditioning light on the barnacle photoreceptor. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 231–235 (1979)Google Scholar

Hochstein, S.: On the implications of bistability of visual pigment systems. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 129–136 (1979)Google Scholar

Hochstein, S., Minke, B., Hillman, P.: Antagonistic components of the late receptor potential arising from different stages of the pigment process. J. Gen. Physiol. 62, 105–128 (1973)Google Scholar

Kirschfeld, K.: The function of photostable pigments in fly photoreceptors. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 117–128 (1979)Google Scholar

Kirschfeld, K., Franceschini, N., Minke, B.: Evidence for a sensitizing pigment in fly photoreceptors. Nature 269, 386–390 (1977)Google Scholar

Laiwand, R., Atzmon, Z., Hochstein, S., Hillman, P.: Properties of the on-transient of the intracellular response in the barnacle photoreceptor. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 237–242 (1979)Google Scholar

Lisman, J. E., Strong, J.: The initiation of excitation and light-adaptation in Limulus ventral photoreceptors. J. Gen. Physiol. (In press, 1979)Google Scholar

Minke, B.: Transduction in photoreceptors with bistable pigments: Intermediate processes. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 163–174 (1979)Google Scholar

Muijser, H., Stavenga, D. G.: Receptor and after-potentials in blowfly visual sense cells: Dependence on rhodopsin-metarhodopsin ratio. Biophys. Struct Mech. 5, 187–196 (1979)Google Scholar

Rothschild, M.: Remarks on carotenoids in the evolution of signals. In: Coevolution of animals and plants. Gilbert, L. E., Raven, P. H. (eds.), pp. 20–51. Austin, London: University of Texas Press 1975Google Scholar

Shaw, C., Hananim, M., Hillman, P.: Effects of Mn²⁺ and Ca²⁺ on the prolonged depolarizing afterpotential. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 323–330 (1979)Google Scholar

Stark, W. S.: Photopigment conversion efficiency in fly compound eye and ocellar receptors. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 5, 197–209 (1979)Google Scholar

Stavenga, D. G.: Prolonged effects of visual pigment conversions emerging in the pupillary response of the fly. Biophys. Struct Mech. 5, 175–185 (1979)Google Scholar

Strong, J., Lisman, J. E.: Initiation of light adaptation in barnacle photoreceptors. Science 200, 1485–1487 (1978)Google Scholar