GeoJournal

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 5–15 | Cite as

Tourism research in the United States: a geographic perspective

  • Mitchell Lisle S. 
Geography of Tourism and Leisure

Abstract

The nature of tourism geography research in the United States is characterized by seven factors. First, research is not concentrated on a few topics of interest but rather is very diverse. Second, there is no research paradigm to influence the direction of investigations. Third, examination of tourism tends to stress the unique case rather than the general situation. Fourth, studies that replicate and/or verify original findings are not common. Fifth, the complexity of the tourism experience and the lack of data bases partially explain ideographic tendencies. Sixth, efforts to produce an understanding of the spatial aspects of tourism are primarily conducted by individuals and small groups. Seventh, emphasis is placed on domestic rather than international tourism. In conclusion, four future trends are noted. One, research that has been expanding rapidly will continue to increase but at a slower rate. Two, improved technology and methods of collecting information will make available large data sets for the assessment of tourism trends at international, national, regional, and state levels. Three, increased needs for useful research findings will result in more theoretical and applied investigations. Four, tourism geographers will engage in increased amounts of interdisciplinary research and begin to associate more and more with other social scientists in the examination of tourism.

Keywords

United States Slow Rate Research Finding Large Data State Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References Cited

  1. Alexander, L.M.: The Impact of Tourism on the Economy of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Economic Geography, 24, 66–77 (1959)Google Scholar
  2. Bohlin, K.M.; Ironside, R.G.: Recreation Expenditures and Sales in the Pigeon Lake Area of Alberta: A Case of Trickle-Up? Journal of Leisure Research, 8, 275–188 (1976)Google Scholar
  3. Britton, R.: The Image of the Third World in Tourism Marketing. Annals of Tourism Research, 6, 318–329 (1979)Google Scholar
  4. Britton, S.G.: The Political Economy of Tourism in the Third World Annals of Tourism Research, 9, 331–358 (1982)Google Scholar
  5. Butler, R.W.: Social Implications of Tourist Development. Annals of Tourism Research, 2, 100–111 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. Butler, R.W.: Geographical Research on Leisure — Reflections and Anticipation on Accrington and Fire Hydrants. In: Ng, D., Smith, S. (eds.), Perspectives on the Nature of Leisure Research, pp. 43–67. The University of Waterloo Press, Waterloo, Canada 1982.Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, A.V.: A Bibliography of Geographical Research on Tourism. Journal of Cultural Geography, 1, 161–184 (1980)Google Scholar
  8. Chubb, M.; Chubb, H.R.: One Third of Our Time. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Clawson, M.; Knetsch, J.L.: Economics of Outdoor Recreation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1966.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, C.: Site and Situation Strategy in Tourism Planning: A Mexican Case Study. Annals of Tourism Research, 6, 351–366 (1979)Google Scholar
  11. Coppock, J. T.: The Geography of Leisure and Recreation. Geography: Yesterday and Tomorrow, pp. 263–279. Oxford University Press, London 1980.Google Scholar
  12. Demars, S.: British Contributions to American Seaside Resorts. Annals of Tourism Research, 6, 285–293 (1979)Google Scholar
  13. Ewing, G.O.: Progress and Problems in the Development of Recreational Trip Generation and Trip Destination Models. Leisure Sciences, 3, 1–24 (1980)Google Scholar
  14. Hartshorne, R.: Perspective on the Nature of Geography. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago 1959.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, S.B.: Mining and Tourist Towns in the Canadian Rockies. Economic Geography, 9, 368–378 (1933)Google Scholar
  16. Kariel, H.G.: Spatial Diffusion: The Alaskan Camper Unit in Washington State. Canadian Geographer, 12, 64–72 (1968)Google Scholar
  17. Lundgren, J.O.J.: The Land Component in National Recreation Planning: The Swedish Case and Its Canadian Applications. Canadian Geographer 24, 22–31 (1980)Google Scholar
  18. Matley, I.M.: The Geography of International Tourism. Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC 1976.Google Scholar
  19. McMurry, E.C.; Davis, C.M.: Recreational Geography. In: James, P.E.; Jones, C.F. (Eds.), American Geography: Inventory and Prospect, pp. 251–255, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY 1954.Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell, L.S.: Fifty Years of Recreation Research. Paper presented at the 1981 AAG meeting.Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, L.S.; Smith, R.V.: Recreational Geography: Inventory and Prospect. Professional Geographer, forthcoming 1984.Google Scholar
  22. Ray, D.M.: Cultural Differences in Consumer Travel Behavior in Eastern Ontario. Canadian Geographer, 11, 143–156 (1967)Google Scholar
  23. Romsa, G.: Method of Deriving Outdoor Recreational Activity Packages. Journal of Leisure Research 5, 34–46 (1973)Google Scholar
  24. Romsa, G.: The Identification of Outdoor Recreation Market Segments on the Basis of Frequency of Participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 8, 247–255 (1976)Google Scholar
  25. Smith, S.J.L.: Reflections on the Development of Geographic Research in Recreation: Hey Buddy, Can You S'paradigm? Ontario Geography, 19, 5–28 (1982)Google Scholar
  26. Stanfield, C.A.; Rickert, J.E.: The Recreational Business District. Journal of Leisure Research, 2, 213–215 (1970)Google Scholar
  27. Stanfield, C.A.: Atlantic City and the Resort Cycle: Background to the Legalization of Gambling. Annals of Tourism Research, 5, 238–252 (1978)Google Scholar
  28. Stanton, W.J.: The Purpose and Source of Seasonal Migration to Alaska. Economic Geography, 31, 138–148 (1955)Google Scholar
  29. Tombaugh, L.: Factors Influencing Vacation Home Locations. Journal of Leisure Research, 2, 54–63 (1970)Google Scholar
  30. Van Doren, C.S.: Outdoor Recreation Trends in the 1980's: Implications for Society. Journal of Travel Research, 19, 3–10 (1981)Google Scholar
  31. Van Doren, C.S.: Tourism, First in 38 States. Unpublished paper presented to the 1983 National Recreation and Parks Association meeting.Google Scholar
  32. Websters New Collegiate Dictionary, p. 1234. G. & C. Merriam Company, Springfield, MA 1973.Google Scholar
  33. Wilkinson, P.: The Use of Models in Predicting the Consumption of Outdoor Recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 5, 34–48 (1973)Google Scholar
  34. Wolfe, R.I.: Perspective on Outdoor Recreation: A Bibliographic Survey. Geographic Review, 54, 203–239 (1964)Google Scholar
  35. Wolfe, R.I.: Recreation Travel: The New Migration. Canadian Geographer, 10, 1–14 (1966)Google Scholar
  36. Wolfe, R.I.: Vacation Homes as Social Indicators. Leisure Sciences, 1, 327–343 (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mitchell Lisle S. 
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations