Respiratory symptoms and ventilatory capacity in workers in a vegetable pickling and mustard production facility

  • Eugenija Zuskin
  • Jadranka Mustajbegovic
  • E. Neil Schachter
  • Nicholas Rienzi
Original articles

Summary

A group of 117 women occupationally exposed in a pickling factory were studied for the prevalence of acute and chronic respiratory symptoms and lung function changes. Workers were studied by task which included (1) pickling, (2) mustard making, and (3) packing. Similar prevalences for all respiratory symptoms were seen for the three worker groups, with all groups having significantly higher prevalences of chronic cough (P < 0.05), chest tightness, nasal catarrh, and sinusitis (P < 0.01) than a nonexposed control group from a bottling plant. Prevalences of acute symptoms were greater for pickling than for mustard or packing workers. Measured forced expiratory volume in 1 s and maximum flow rates at 50% and the last 25% of the control vital capacity were in general significantly lower than predicted values for the worker subgroups. Pickling workers exposed for more than 1 year in the industry had greater across-shift reductions for all spirometric parameters tested than those workers exposed for 1 year or less. Our data suggest that extended occupational exposure in the pickling industry results in acute exposure-related respiratory effects and ultimately may lead to the development of chronic respiratory symptoms and changes in baseline lung function.

Key words

Acid air pollution Pickling workers Respiratory symptoms Lung function Spices 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aris R, Christian D, Sheppard D, Balmes J (1991) Lack of bronchoconstrictor response to sulfuric acid aerosols and fogs. Am Rev Respir Dis 143:744–750Google Scholar
  2. British Medical Research Council Committee on the Aetiology of Chronic Bronchitis (1960) Standardized questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. B MJ 2:1665Google Scholar
  3. Chaney S, Blomquist W, Muller K, Goldstein G (1980) Biochemical changes in humans upon exposure to sulfuric acid aerosol and exercise. Arch Environ Health 35:211–216Google Scholar
  4. Dahl R, Henriksen JM, Harving H (1986) Red vine asthma: a controlled challenge study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 78:1126–1129Google Scholar
  5. Ferris BG (1978) Epidemiology standardization project. III. Recommended standardized procedures for pulmonary function testing. Am Rev Respir Dis 118:55–88Google Scholar
  6. Geppert EF, Boushey HA (1978) An investigation of the mechanism of ethanol-induced bronchoconstriction. Am Rev Respir Dis 118:135–139Google Scholar
  7. Gershwin ME, Ough C, Bock A, Fletcher MP, Nagy MN, Tuft DS (1985) Graund rounds: adverse reactions to wine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 75:411–420Google Scholar
  8. Gong H, Tashkin DP, Calvarese BM (1981) Alcohol-induced evaluation of the mechanism. Chest 90:167–173Google Scholar
  9. Hackney JD, Linn WS, Avol EL (1989) Acid fog effects on respiratory function and symptoms in healthy and asthmatic volunteers. Environ Health Perspect 79:159–162Google Scholar
  10. Hicks R (1968) Ethanol, a possible allergen. Ann Allergy 26:641–643Google Scholar
  11. Horstman D, Hazucha M, Haak E, Stacy R (1982) Effects of submicronic sulfuric acid aerosol on human pulmonary function. Arch Environ Health 37:136–141Google Scholar
  12. Jedrychowski W, Krzynowski M (1989) Ventilatory lung function and chronic chest symptoms among the inhabitants of urban areas with various levels of acid aerosols: prospective study in Cracow. Environ Health Perspect 79:101–107Google Scholar
  13. Kerr HD, Kulle TJ, Farrell BP, Sander LR, Young JL, Swift DL, Borushok RM (1981) Effects of sulfuric acid aerosol on pulmonary function in human subjects: an environmental chamber study. Environ Res 26:42–50Google Scholar
  14. Linn WS, Avo EL, Anderson KR, Shamoo DA, Peng RC, Hackney JD (1989) Effects of droplet size on respiratory responses to inhaled sulfuric acid in normal and asthmatic volunteers. Am Rev Respir Dis 140:161–166Google Scholar
  15. Przybilla B, Ring J (1983) Anaphylaxis to ethanol and sensitisation to acetic acid. Lancet I:483Google Scholar
  16. Quanjer PD (1983) Standardized lung function testing. Report of the working party “Standardization of lung function tests” of the European Community for Coal and Steel, Luxembourg. Bull Eur Physiopath Respir 19:1–95Google Scholar
  17. Raizenne ME, Burnett RT, Stern B, Franklin CA, Spengler JD (1989) Acute lung function responses to ambient acid aerosol exposures in children. Environ Health Perspect 79:179–185Google Scholar
  18. Rajan KG, Davies BH (1989) Reversible airway obstruction and interstitial pneumonitis due to acetic acid. Br J Ind Med 46:67–68Google Scholar
  19. Speer F (1975) Multiple food allergy. Ann Allergy 34:71–76Google Scholar
  20. World Health Organization (1986) Early detection of occupational lung disease. World Health Organization, Geneva, p 36–45Google Scholar
  21. Zuskin E, Bouhus A, Saric M (1981) Lung function changes by ethanol inhalation. Clin Allergy 11:243–248Google Scholar
  22. Zuskin E, Skuric Z, Kanceljak B, Pokrajac D, Schachter EN, Witek TJ (1988a) Respiratory findings in spice factory workers. Arch Environ Health 43:335–339Google Scholar
  23. Zuskin E, Kanceljak B, Skuric Z, Pokarajc D, Schachter EN, Witek TJ, Maayani S (1988b) Immunmological and respiratory findings in spice-factory workers. Environ Res 47:95–108Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eugenija Zuskin
    • 1
  • Jadranka Mustajbegovic
    • 1
  • E. Neil Schachter
    • 2
  • Nicholas Rienzi
    • 2
  1. 1.Andrija Stampar School of Public HealthZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Mount Sinai School of MedicineNewYorkUSA

Personalised recommendations