Cellular and subcellular localization of polyamines cytochemical methods providing new clues to polyamine function in normal and neoplastic cells
Summary
Studies on the cellular and subcellular localization of polyamines have previously been hampered by the rapid redistribution of these organic cations during cell fractionation. Cytochemical methods selectively localizing polyamines would, hence, be important for our understanding of where polyamines are stored and where they work. With the aid of chemical characterizations of tissue extracts, biosynthesis experiments and cytochemical model experiments we show that the cytochemical formaldehyde-fluorescamine (FF) technique selectively detects the polyamines spermine and spermidine. Results obtained with the FF method concur with previous chemical observations by showing that growing and neoplastic cell populations are rich in cytochemically detectable polyamines. The FF method also localizes polyamines to certain normal secretory cell systems, including pancreatic exocrine and endocrine (insulin) cells, cells and secretion products in the ventral prostate, pituitary growth hormone cells and neurosecretory nerve endings and leucocytes. In most cell systems studied, polyamines appear to be most concentrated in cytoplasmic structures. However, in HeLa cell mitotic chromosomes and in frog red cell nuclei most polyamines seem to be associated with chromatin. These observations raise important questions concerning both extra- and intracellular functions of polyamines.
Keywords
Spermine Spermidine Organic Cation Mitotic Chromosome Ventral ProstatePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bachrach U (1976) Polyamines as chemical markers of malignancy. Ital J Biochem 25:77–93Google Scholar
- Benson JR, Hare PE (1975) o-Phtalaldehyde: Fluorogenic detection of primary amines in the picomole range: comparisons with fluorescamine and ninhydrin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:619–622Google Scholar
- Björklund A, Falck B, Owman C (1972) Fluorescence microscopic and microspectrofluorometric techniques for the cellular localization and characterization of biogenic monoamines. In: Berson SA (ed) Methods of investigative and diagnostic endocrinology. Vol 1: Rall JE and Kopin IJ (eds) The thyroid and biogenic amines. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 318–368Google Scholar
- Böhlen P, Stein S, Dairman W, Udenfriend S (1973) Fluorometric assay of proteins in the nanogram range. Arch Biochem Biophys 155:213–220Google Scholar
- Castell JV, Cervera M, Marco R (1979) A convenient micromethod for the assay of primary amines and proteins with fluorescamine. A reexamination of the conditions of reaction. Anal Biochem 99:379–391Google Scholar
- Cohen SS (1977) Conference on polyamines in cancer. Cancer Res 37:939–942Google Scholar
- Cohen SS (1978) What do the polyamines do? Nature 274:209–210Google Scholar
- Cooper KD, Shukla JB, Rennert OB (1976) Polyamine distribution in cellular compartments of blood and in aging erythrocytes. Clin Chim Acta 73:71–88Google Scholar
- Fuller JL, Greenspan S, Clark JL (1978) Regulation of ornithine decarboxylase activity in 3T3 cells stimulated to grow. In: Campbell RA, Morris DR, Bartos D, Doyle-Daves G, Bartos F (eds) Advances in polyamine research, vol 1. Raven Press, New York, pp 31–38Google Scholar
- Goyns MH (1979) Polyamine content of a non-aqueously isolated chromosome preparation. Exp Cell Res 122:377–380Google Scholar
- Hougaard DM, Larsson L-I (1981) The formaldehyde-fluorescamine method. An investigation of reaction mechanisms and optimization of the method. Histochemistry 72:401–413Google Scholar
- Håkanson R, Larsson L-I, Sundler F (1974) Fluorescamine: A novel reagent for the histochemical detection of amino groups. Histochemistry 39:15–23Google Scholar
- Jänne J, Pösö H, Raina A (1978) Polyamines in rapid growth and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 473:241–293Google Scholar
- Larsson L-I, Sundler F, Håkanson R (1975) Fluorescamine as a histochemical reagent: Demonstration of polypeptide hormone-secreting cells. Histochemistry 44:245–251Google Scholar
- Mach M, Ebert P, Popp R, Ogilvie A (1982) Compartmentalization of polyamines in mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 104:1327–1334Google Scholar
- Marton LJ, Russell DH, Levy CC (1973) Measurement of putrescine, spermidine and spermine in physiological fluids by use of an amino acid analyzer. Clin Chem 19:923–926Google Scholar
- Mørch-Jørgensen L, Ingemansson S, Larsson L-I (1979a) Formaldehyde-fluorescamine-induced fluorescence as a property of carcinoma cells. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 30:125–130Google Scholar
- Mørch-Jørgensen L, Skovgaard-Poulsen H, Larsson L-I (1979b) Formaldehyde-fluorescamine-induced fluorescence of mammary carcinoma cells. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol 30:281–287Google Scholar
- Russell DH, Medina VJ, Snyder SH (1970) The dynamics of synthesis and degradation of polyamines in normal and regenerating rat liver and brain. J Biol Chem 245:6732–6738Google Scholar
- Russell DH (1977) Clinical relevance of polyamines as biochemical markers of tumor kinetics. Clin Chem 23:22–27Google Scholar
- Sundler F, Larsson L-I, Håkanson R, Ljungberg O (1974) Fluorescamine-induced fluorescence in C cell tumours of the thyroid. Virchows Arch A 363:7–20Google Scholar
- Sunkara PS, Rao PN (1981) Role of polyamines in the regulation of the cell cycle in normal and transformed mammalian cells. In: Cameron IL, Pool TB (eds) Transformed cell. Academic Press, New York, pp 267–291Google Scholar
- Tabor H, Tabor CW (1964) Spermidine, spermine and related amines. Pharmacol Rev 16:245–300Google Scholar
- Turner D, Wrightman SL (1968) Ortho-phtalaldehyde as a spray reagent for thin layer chromatograms. J Chromatogr 32:315–322Google Scholar
- Uddman R, Larsson L-I, Sundler F (1978) Fluorescamine as a cytochemical detection reagent for mammary carcinoma cells. Acta Cytol 22:273–275Google Scholar
- Udenfriend S, Stein S, Böhlen P, Dairman W, Leimgruber W, Weigele M (1972) Fluorescamine: A reagent for assay of amino acids, peptides, proteins and primary amines in the picomole range. Science 178:871–872Google Scholar