Histochemistry

, Volume 74, Issue 4, pp 469–480 | Cite as

Microfluorometric investigations of chromatin structure

III. Estimation of histones and DNA in thymocyte and hepatocyte nuclei. Effects of extraction at pH 3.0
  • R. R. Cowden
  • S. K. Curtis
Article
Accepted:

Summary

Experiments were undertaken in which the histones of mouse thymocyte and hepatocyte nuclei were stained by a fluorescent version of the Alfert and Geschwind (1953) procedure and measured by microfluorometry. These measurements were compared with those obtained after treatment of the nuclei with a pH 3.0 phosphate-citrate buffer which is known to displace fraction H1 histones from the chromatin of HeLa cell nuclei. Estimates of DNA with the fluorochromes Hoechst 33258, mithramycin, and proflavine were obtained in the same nuclei, with and without extraction at pH 3.0. In addition, the effects of extracting the nuclei in a phosphate-citrate buffer at pH 2.5 on DNA measurements were also determined. The results of hydrolyzing the nuclei over a period of 30 min to 5 h in 5% TCA at 60° C and staining at pH 8.0 with brilliant sulfaflavine for the demonstration of histones revealed that the fluorescence of 2c hepatocyte nuclei was always much greater than that of thymocyte nuclei. In addition, hepatocyte nuclei responded more slowly than thymocyte nuclei to hydrolysis; and the ratios of 4c:2c, 8c:4c, and 8c:2c hepatocyte nuclei generally exceeded the expected 2:2:4 values. While the fluorescence of thymocyte nuclei extracted at pH 3.0 and stained by the histone procedure was slightly greater than that of control thymocyte nuclei at all times during the hydrolysis period except for the earliest stages, the fluorescence of pH 3.0-extracted hepatocyte nuclei was always less than that of control hepatocyte nuclei; and the 2, 4, and 8c ploidy classes were not resolved clearly. Extraction at pH 3.0 and 2.5 generally produced an increase in fluorescence of both thymocyte and hepatocyte nuclei stained by the various DNA methods; but the absolute amount of change could not be related directly to known dependencies of the dyes on AT or GC base pairs. The results of the fluorescent histone procedure and those obtained with the various DNA methods after extraction at pH 3.0 and 2.5 indicate that these methods function as “probes” of nucleoprotein organization, rather than as absolutely quantitative procedures. It is presently unclear how the measurements are related to specific differences in the organization of the chromatin and/or transcriptional activities of the two types of nuclei.

Keywords

Mithramycin Proflavine Hepatocyte Nucleus Mouse Thymocyte Ploidy Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfert M, Geschwind II (1953) A selective staining method for basic proteins of cell nuclei. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 39:991–999Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez MR (1974) Early nuclear cytochemical changes in regenerating mammalian liver. Exp Cell Res 83:225–230Google Scholar
  3. Arceci RJ, Gross PR (1980) Histone gene expression: progeny of isolated early blastomeres in culture make the same change as the embryo. Science 209:607–609Google Scholar
  4. Auer G (1972) Nuclear protein content and DNA-histone interaction. Exp Cell Res 75:231–236Google Scholar
  5. Auer G, Zetterberg A, Killander D (1970) Changes in binding between DNA and arginine residues in histone induced by cell crowding. Exp Cell Res 62:32–38Google Scholar
  6. Bak AL, Zeuthen J (1978) Higher-order structure of mitotic chromosomes. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 42:367–377Google Scholar
  7. Black MM, Ansley HR (1965a) Antigen-induced changes in lymphoid cell histones. I. Thymus. J Cell Biol 26:201–208Google Scholar
  8. Black MM, Ansley HR (1965b) Antigen-induced changes in lymphoid cell histones. II. Regional lymph nodes. J Cell Biol 26:797–803Google Scholar
  9. Black MM, Ansley HR (1966) Histone specificity revealed by ammoniacal silver staining. J Histochem Cytochem 14:177–181Google Scholar
  10. Black MM, Ansley HR (1967) Antigen-induced changes in lymphoid cell histones. III. In vitro and in extract. J Cell Biol 35:619–625Google Scholar
  11. Bloch DP (1969) A catalog of sperm histones. Genetics (Suppl) 61:93–111Google Scholar
  12. Bloch DP, Hew HYC (1960) Schedule of spermatogenesis in the pulmonate snail Helix aspersa, with special reference to histone transition. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 7:515–532Google Scholar
  13. Bloch DP, Hew HYC (1961) Changes in nuclear histones during fertilization and early embryonic development in the pulmonate snail, Helix aspersa. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 8:69–81Google Scholar
  14. Bonner J (1979) Expressed and nonexpressed portions of the genome: their separation and their characterization. In: Nicolini CA (ed) Chromatin structure and function. Molecular and cellular biophysical methods, Part A. Plenum Press, New York, pp 15–23Google Scholar
  15. Busch H (1965) Histones and other nuclear proteins. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen LH, Newrock KM, Zweidler A (1975) State-specific switches in histone synthesis during embryogenesis of the sea urchin. Science 190:994–997Google Scholar
  17. Cohn NS (1973) A model system analysis of the parameters in histone staining: I Alkaline fast green. Histochem J 5:529–545Google Scholar
  18. Cowden RR (1962) Further cytochemical investigations on the growth and development of slug oocytes. Growth 26:209–234Google Scholar
  19. Cowden RR, Curtis SK (1981a) Microfluorometric investigations of chromatin structure. I. Evaluation of nine DNA-specific fluorochromes as probes of chromatin organization. Histochemistry 72:11–23Google Scholar
  20. Cowden RR, Curtis SK (1981b) Microfluorometric investigations of chromatin structure. II. Mordant fluorochroming with ions that complex with Morin. Histochemistry 72:391–400Google Scholar
  21. Curtis SK, Cowden RR (1980) The effects of fixation and preparation on three quantitative fluorescent cytochemical procedures. Histochemistry 68:29–38Google Scholar
  22. Dubochet J, Noll M (1978) Nucleosome arcs and helices. Science 202:280–286Google Scholar
  23. Geyer G (1960) Zur Eiweissfärbung mit Amidoschwartz 10 B. Acta Histochem 10:286–292Google Scholar
  24. Gledhill BL, Gledhill MP, Rigler R, Ringertz NR (1966) Changes in deoxyribonucleoprotein during spermiogenesis in the bull. Exp Cell Res 41:652–665Google Scholar
  25. Hentschel CC, Birnstiel ML (1981) The organization and expression of histone gene families. Cell 26:301–313Google Scholar
  26. Hnilica LS (1964) The specificity of histones in chicken erythrocytes. Experientia 20:13–14Google Scholar
  27. Jackson V (1978) Studies on histone organization in the nucleosome using formaldehyde as a reversible cross-linking agent. Cell 15:945–954Google Scholar
  28. Klingholz R, Strätling WH, Schäfer H (1981) Structure of rat liver after depletion and reassociation of histone H1. Exp Cell Res 132:399–409Google Scholar
  29. Kornberg RD (1974) Chromatin structure: a repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science 184:868–871Google Scholar
  30. Kornberg RD (1977) Structure of chromatin. Annu Rev Biochem 46:931–954Google Scholar
  31. Kornberg RD, Klug A (1981) The nucleosome. Sci Am 244:52–64Google Scholar
  32. Kornberg RD, Thomas JO (1974) Chromatin structure: oligamers of histones. Science 184:865–868Google Scholar
  33. Latt SA, Wholleb JC (1975) Optical studies of the interaction of 33258 Hoechst with DNA, chromatin, and metaphase chromosomes. Chromosoma 52:297–316Google Scholar
  34. Lawson GM, Cole RD (1979) Selective displacement of histone H1 from whole HeLa nuclei: effect on chromatin structure in situ as probed by micrococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 18:2160–2166Google Scholar
  35. Leemann U, Ruch F (1972) Cytofluorometric determination of basic and total proteins with sulfaflavine. J Histochem Cytochem 20:659–671Google Scholar
  36. Lief RC, Easter HN, Warters RL, Thomas RA, Dunlap LA, Austin MF (1971) Centrifugal cytology. I. A quantitative technique for the preparation of glutaraldehyde-fixed cells for the light and scanning electron microscope. J Histochem Cytochem 19:203–215Google Scholar
  37. Lillie RD, Fullmer HM (1976) Histopathologic technic and practical histochemistry, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Macrae EK, Meetz GD (1970) Electron microscopy of the ammoniacal silver reaction for histones in the erythropoietic cells of the chick. J Cell Biol 45:235–245Google Scholar
  39. Morris NR (1976) A comparison of the structure of chicken erythrocyte and chicken liver chromatin. Cell 9:627–632Google Scholar
  40. Müller W, Gautier F (1975) Interactions of heteroaromatic compounds with nucleic acids. A·T-specific non-intercalating DNA ligands. Eur J Biochem 54:385–394Google Scholar
  41. Myśliwski A (1971) Reaction on histones with ammoniacal silver in chromatin in different states of condensation. Acta Histochem 39:248–251Google Scholar
  42. Noeske K (1973) Discrepancies between cytophotometric alkaline fast green measurements and nuclear histone protein content. Histochem J 5:303–311Google Scholar
  43. Noll M (1974) Subunit structure of chromatin. Nature 251:249–251Google Scholar
  44. Olins AL, Olins DE (1974) Spheroid chromatin units (v bodies). Science 183:330–332Google Scholar
  45. Olins DE, Olins AL (1978) Nucleosomes: the structural quantum in chromosomes. Am Sci 66:704–711Google Scholar
  46. Oudet P, Gross-Bellard M, Chambon P (1975) Electron microscopic and biochemical evidence that chromatin structure is a repeating unit. Cell 4:281–300Google Scholar
  47. Petrov P, Raitcheva E, Tsanev R (1980) Nucleosomes and nonribosomal RNA transcription in early mouse embryo. An electron microscope study. Eur J Cell Biol 22:708–713Google Scholar
  48. Pipkin JL Jr (1968) Cytological and cytochemical methodology of histones. In: Prescott DM (ed) Methods in cell physiology, vol III. Academic Press, New York, pp 307–346Google Scholar
  49. Poccia D, Salik J, Krystal G (1981) Transitions in histone variants of the male pronucleus following fertilization and evidence for a maternal store of cleavage-stage histones in the sea urchin egg. Dev Biol 82:287–296Google Scholar
  50. Ringertz NR (1969) Cytochemical properties of nuclear proteins and deoxyribonucleoprotein complexes in relation to nuclear function. In: Lima-De-Faria A (ed) Handbook of molecular cytology. American Elsevier, New York, pp 656–684Google Scholar
  51. Ringertz NR, Zetterberg A (1966) Cytochemical demonstration of histones. Mechanism and specificity of the alkaline bromphenol blue binding reaction. Exp Cell Res 42:243–259Google Scholar
  52. Ruch F (1970) Principles and some applications of cytofluorometry. In: Wied GL (ed) Introduction to quantitative cytochemistry, vol II. Academic Press, New York, pp 431–450Google Scholar
  53. Ruch F, Rosselet A (1970) A cytochemical study of euchromatin and heterochromatin in roots of Rhoeo discolor. Exp Cell Res 62:219–227Google Scholar
  54. Schmitz KS, Ramanathan B (1980) Generation of a third-order folded structure for chromatin. J Theor Biol 83:297–311Google Scholar
  55. Spicer SS (1962) Histochemically selective acidophilia of basic proteins in chromatin and nucleoli at alkaline pH. J Histochem Cytochem 10:691–703Google Scholar
  56. Šponar J, Šormová Z (1972) Complexes of histone F1 with DNA in 0.15 M NaCl. Selectivity of interaction with respect to DNA composition. Eur J Biochem 29:99–103Google Scholar
  57. Šonar J, Doskočil J, Bláha K, Zimmer Ch (1976) Basic polypeptides as histone models. Effect of conformation, base composition and methylation of nucleic acids on the interaction with H1 and histone models and on the circular dichroism of complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 3:507–521Google Scholar
  58. Swift H (1966) The quantitative cytochemistry of RNA. In: Wied GL (ed) Introduction to quantitative cytochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 355–386Google Scholar
  59. Thoma F, Koller Th, Klug A (1979) Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J Cell Biol 83:403–427Google Scholar
  60. Thomes JC, Weill G, Duane M (1969) Fluorescence of proflavine-DNA complexes: Heterogeneity of binding sites. Biopolymers 8:647–659Google Scholar
  61. Ward DC, Reich E, Goldberg IH (1969) Base specificity in the interaction of polynucleotides with antibiotic drugs. Science 149:1259–1263Google Scholar
  62. Waring M (1970) Variation of the supercoils in closed circular DNA by binding of antibiotics and drugs: evidence for molecular models involving intercalation. J Mol Biol 54:247–279Google Scholar
  63. Weisblum B, Haenssler E (1974) Fluorometric properties of the bibenzimidazole derivative Hoechst 33258, a fluorescent probe specific for AT concentration in chromosomal DNA. Chromosoma 46:255–260Google Scholar
  64. Woodcock CLF (1973) Ultrastructure of inactive chromatin. J Cell Biol 59:368aGoogle Scholar
  65. Wray W, Conn PM, Wray VP (1977) Isolation of nuclei using hexylene glycol. In: Stein G, Stein J, Kleinsmith LJ (eds) Methods in cell biology, vol XVI. Academic Press, New York, pp 69–86Google Scholar
  66. Zachau HG, Igo-Kemenes T (1981) Face to phase with nucleosomes. Cell 24:597–598Google Scholar
  67. Zetterberg A, Auer G (1968) Early changes in the binding between DNA and histone in human leucocytes exposed to phytohaemagglutinin. Exp Cell Res 56:122–126Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. R. Cowden
    • 1
  • S. K. Curtis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biophysics, Quillen-Dishner College of MedicineEast Tennessee State UniversityJohnson CityUSA

Personalised recommendations