Histochemistry

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 137–154

Peroxisomes in the liver of the carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) electron microscopic cytochemical and biochemical studies

  • R. Kramar
  • H. Goldenberg
  • P. Böck
  • N. Klobučar
Article

Summary

Hepatocytes of carps are investigated during the time from October to June. Morphological examinations reveal the occurrence of abundant single membrane bound organelles, 0.2 to 0.75 μm in diameter. These particles are of irregular round, oval or elongated shape. They show a matrix of moderate electron density and coarse granular substructure. A noncrystalline but dense core is observed very rarely.

Incubation of glutaraldehyde fixed tissue in alkaline (pH 9.0) medium containing 0.2% 3,3′ diaminobezidine and 0.02% H2O2 results in dense staining of these particles. The histochemical staining reaction is due to peroxidatic activity of catalase, since it is abolished by the addition of 2×10−2 M 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole. The organelles do not react for acid phosphatase activity. They are interpreted to represent peroxisomes.

Biochemical examinations indicate that all peroxisomal enzymes investigated (catalase, urate oxidase, D-amino-acid oxidase, L-α-OH-acid oxidase) are present in the mitochondrial, lysosomal and microsomal fraction prepared from carp liver homogenates by differential centrifugation methods. Pellets of every fraction are controlled morphologically as well as histochemically. In particular, catalase activity is demonstrated in membrane bound particles which sediment with the microsomal fraction. This finding is discussed with special reference to the problem if small type peroxisomes (microperoxisomes) represent true peroxisomal systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afzelius, B. A.: The occurrence and structure of microbodies. A comparative study. J. Cell Biol. 26, 835–843 (1965)Google Scholar
  2. Baudhuin, P., Beaufay, H., Duve, C. de: Combined biochemical and morphological study of particulate fractions from rat liver. J. Cell Biol. 26, 219–243 (1965)Google Scholar
  3. Bergmeyer, H.-U.: quoted from Aebi, H.: Katalase. In: Methoden der enzymatischen Analyse (H.-U. Bergmeyer, Hrsg.) Weinheim: Verlag Chemie 1970Google Scholar
  4. Böck, P.: Cytochemical demonstration of catalasepositive particles (peroxisomes?) in fibroblasts. Z. Zellforsch. 144, 539–547 (1973)Google Scholar
  5. Coleman, R., Evennett, P. J., Dodd, J. M.: The ultrastructural localization of acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase and adenosine triphosphatase in induced goitres of Xenopus laevis daudin tadpoles. Histochemie 10, 33–43 (1967)Google Scholar
  6. Connock, M. J.: Intestinal peroxisomes in the goldfish (Carassius auratus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 45A, 945–951 (1973)Google Scholar
  7. Connock, M. J., Kirk, P. R.: Identification of peroxisomes in the epithelial cells of the small intestine of the guinea pig. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21, 502–503 (1973)Google Scholar
  8. Duve, C. de: Functions of microbodies (peroxisomes). J. Cell Biol. 27, 25A (1965)Google Scholar
  9. Duve, C. de: Biochemical studies on the occurrence, biogenesis and life history of mammalian peroxisomes. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21, 941–948 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Duve, C. de, Baudhuin, P.: Peroxisomes (microbodies and related particles). Physiol. Rev. 46, 323–357 (1966)Google Scholar
  11. Ericsson, J. L. E.: Adsorption and decomposition of homologous hemoglobin in renal proximal tubular cells. Acta path. microbiol. scand., Suppl. 168, 1–121 (1964)Google Scholar
  12. Fahimi, H. D.: Cytochemical localization of peroxidatic activity of catalase in rat hepatic microbodies. J. Cell Biol. 43, 275–288 (1969)Google Scholar
  13. Hruban, Z., Rechcigl, M.: Microbodies and related particles. Morphology, biochemistry and physiology. Int Rev. Cytol., Suppl. 1, New York, London: Academic Press 1969Google Scholar
  14. Hruban, Z., Vigil, E. L., Slesers, A., Hopkins, E.: Mikrobodies. Constituent organelles of animal cells. Lab. Invest. 27, 184–191 (1972)Google Scholar
  15. Karnovsky, M. J.: A formaldehyde-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolality for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 27, 137A-138A (1965)Google Scholar
  16. Leskes, A., Siekevitz, P., Palade, G. E.: Differentiation of endoplasmic reticulum in hepatocytes. I. Glucose-6-phosphatase distribution in situ. J. Cell Biol. 49, 264–287 (1971)Google Scholar
  17. Luft, J. H.: Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 9, 409–414 (1961)Google Scholar
  18. Mahler, H. R., Hübscher, G., Baum, H.: Studies on uricase. I. Preparation, purification, and properties of a cuproprotein. J. biol. Chem. 216, 625–641 (1955)Google Scholar
  19. Miller, F., Palade, G. E.: Lytic activities in renal protein absorption droplets. An electron microscopical cytochemical study. J. Cell Biol. 23, 510–552 (1964)Google Scholar
  20. Novikoff, A. B., Novikoff, P. M., Davis, C., Quintana, N.: Studies on microperoxisomes. V. Are microperoxisomes ubiquitose in mammalian cells?. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21, 737–755 (1973a)Google Scholar
  21. Novikoff, A. B., Shin, W. Y.: The endoplasmic reticulum in the Golgi zone and its relation to microbodies, Golgi apparatus and autophagic vacuoles in rat liver cells. J. Microscopie 3, 187–206 (1964)Google Scholar
  22. Novikoff, P. M., Novikoff, A. B.: Peroxisomes in absorptive cells of mammalian small intestine. J. Cell Biol. 53, 532–560 (1972)Google Scholar
  23. Novikoff, P. M., Novikoff, A. B., Quintana, N., Davis, C.: Studies on microperoxisomes. III. Observations on human and rat liver. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 21, 540–558 (1973b)Google Scholar
  24. Reynolds, E. S.: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electronopaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963)Google Scholar
  25. Rhodin, J.: Correlation of ultrastructural organization and function in normal and experimentally changed proximal convoluted tubule cells of the mouse kidney. Thesis, Karolinska Inst. Stockholm, 1954Google Scholar
  26. Sarlet, H., Grivegnee, R., Faidherbe, J., Frenck, G.: quoted from Hruban and Recheigl (1969)Google Scholar
  27. Tisher, C. C., Bulger, R. E., Trump, B. F.: Human renal ultrastructure. I. Proximal tubule of healthy individuals. Lab. Invest. 15, 1357–1394 (1966)Google Scholar
  28. Truszkowski, R., Goldmanowa, C.: Uricase and its action. VI. Distribution in various animals. Biochem. J. 27, 612–614 (1933)Google Scholar
  29. Tsukada, H., Koyama, S., Gotoh, M., Tadano, H.: Fine structure of crystalloid nucleoids of compact type in hepatocyte microbodies of guinea pigs, cats, and rabbits. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 36, 159–175 (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Kramar
    • 1
    • 2
  • H. Goldenberg
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Böck
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. Klobučar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of medical ChemistryUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Micromorphology and Electron MicroscopyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Sveučilišta u ZagrebuZoologijski zavod PMF-aZagrebJugoslavia

Personalised recommendations