Negotiating criteria and setting limits: The case of aids
- 15 Downloads
The classification of clinical problems, such as AIDS, requires choices. Choices are made on epistemic (i.e., knowledge-based) and non-epistemic (i.e., action-based) grounds. That is, the ways in which we classify clinical problems, such as AIDS, involve a balancing of different understandings of clinical reality and of clinical values among participants of the clinical community. On this view, the interplay between epistemic and non-epistemic interests occurs within the embrace of particular clinical contexts.
The ways in which we classify AIDS is the topic of this paper. We consider the extent to which we construct clinical reality; we examine a suggested classification of AIDS; and we conclude suggesting that the choice regarding how to classify AIDS is the result of negotiation among participants in the clinical community.
Key wordsAIDS clinical classification ethics moral decision-making
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Barre-Sinoussi F, Chermann JC, Rey F, et al. T-lymphotrophic retrovirus from a patient at risk for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Science 1983; 220:868–71.Google Scholar
- 2.Gallo RC, Salahuddin SZ, Popovic M, et al. Frequent detection and isolation of cytopathic retroviruses (HTLV-III) from patients with AIDS and at risk for AIDS. Science 1984;224:500–3.Google Scholar
- 3.Levy JA, Hoffman AD, Kramer SM, Landis JA, Shimabukuro JM, Oshiro LS. Isolation of lymphocytopathic retroviruses from San Francisco patients with AIDS. Science 1984; 225:840–2.Google Scholar
- 4.Coffin J, Haase A, Levy JA, et al. Human immunodeficiency viruses. [Letter]. Science 1986; 232:697.Google Scholar
- 5.Varmus H. Naming the AIDS virus. In: Juengst ET, Koenig BA, eds. Meaning of AIDS: Perspectives from the Humanities. New York: Praeger Scientific Publishers, 1989:3–11.Google Scholar
- 6.Hart HLA, Honoré AM. Causation in the Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1959.Google Scholar
- 7.Beauchamp TL, ed. Philosophical Problems of Causation. Encino, CA: Dickenson Publishing Company, 1974.Google Scholar
- 8.Forstein M. Understanding the psychological impact of AIDS: the other epidemic. New England Journal of Public Policy 1988; 4:159–72.Google Scholar
- 9.Stead WW. Pathogenesis of the sporadic case of tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1967; 277:1008–12.Google Scholar
- 10.Gonnella JS, Hornbrook MC, Louis DZ. Staging of disease: a case-mix measurement. JAMA 1984; 251:637–44.Google Scholar
- 11.Centers for Disease Control. Classification system for human T-lymphotrophic virus type III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus infection. JAMA 1986; 256:21.Google Scholar
- 12.Engelhardt HT Jr. The Foundations of Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
- 13.Norman C. A new twist in AIDS patent fight. Science 1986; 232:308–9.Google Scholar
- 14.Stark S. Politics and AIDS: conversations and comments. New England Journal of Public Policy 1988; 4:455–64.Google Scholar
- 15.Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:665–73.Google Scholar
- 16.Fisher B, Redmond C, Fisher ER, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N Engl J Med 1985; 312:674–81.Google Scholar
- 17.Lawrie GM, Morris GC, Howell JF, Chapman DW. A debate on coronary bypass. [Letter]. N Engl J Med 1977; 297:1464–70.Google Scholar
- 18.DeBakey ME, Lawrie GM. Aortocoronary-artery bypass: assessment after 13 years. JAMA 1978; 239:837–9.Google Scholar