Theoretical Medicine

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 177–187 | Cite as

The language of pain

  • Konrad Ehlich

Abstract

The expression ‘pain’ refers to a phenomenon intrinsic to individuals. The object of the language of pain is restricted to an individual experience which excludes any form of direct access by others. Speaking about pain is thus one of the most difficult forms of linguistic activities, as has been repeatedly pointed out by Wittgenstein. The difficulties involved in this type of communication are not only dependent upon individual linguistic ability but are also clearly reflected in the state and structure of the linguistic means which are at the disposal of the speakers of a language. Linguistic means vary in status and complexity with respect to the ends which they can be used for.

In this paper, I discuss two aspects of communicating pain: types of expression which are involved in speaking about pain, and linguistic activities which are carried out when speaking about pain. The two aspects are interrelated. My analysis makes use of categories belonging to the theory of linguistic activity and to the extended field theory of language (an expansion of Bühler's concept of symbolic and deictic field analysis of language).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baross, Z.: forthcoming, ‘Speaking of pain — or Wittgenstein's fundamental misunderstanding’, Maiuntics, vol. 1, No. 3.Google Scholar
  2. Bergsma, J.: 1983, Somatopsychologie, op zoek naar psychosociale dimensies van de geneeskunde, J. Wristers b.v..Google Scholar
  3. Bühler, K.: 1934, 19652, Sprachtheorie, Fischer, Stuttgart; parts of the book have been translated in: Jarvella, R. J. and Klein, W. (eds.): 1982, Speech, Place and Action, Wiley, Chicester.Google Scholar
  4. Ehlich, K.: forthcoming, Interjektionen, Niemeyer, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  5. von Morstein, P.: 1964, Wittgensteins Untersuchungen des Wortes ‘Schmerz’, Archiv für Philosophie 13, 131–140.Google Scholar
  6. Ryle, G.: 1949, 196911, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  7. Weisgerber, L.: 1928, ‘Der Geruchsinn in unseren Sprachen’, Indogermanische Forschungen 46, 121–150; also in Weisgerber, L.: 1964, Zur Grundlegung der ganzheitlichen Sprachauffassung, Schwann, Düsseldorf, 99–121.Google Scholar
  8. Wittgenstein, L.: 19673, Philosophical Investigations, translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing CompanyD. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konrad Ehlich
    • 1
  1. 1.Abt. 15Universität DortmundDortmund 50

Personalised recommendations