Science & Education

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 287–302 | Cite as

Science education as an exercise in foreign affairs

  • William W. Cobern
Article

Abstract

In Kuhnian terms, science education has been a process of inducting students into the reigning paradigms of science. In 1985, Duschl noted that science education had not kept pace with developments in the history and philosophy of science. The claim of certainty for scientific knowledge which science educators grounded in positivist philosophy was rendered untenable years ago and it turns out that social and cultural factors surrounding discovery may be at least as important as the justification of knowledge.

Capitalizing on these new developments, Duschl, Hamilton, and Grandy (1990) wrote a compelling argument for the need to have a joint research effort in science education involving the philosophy and history of science along with cognitive psychology. However, the issue of discovery compels the research community go one step further. If the science education community has been guilty of neglecting historical and philosophical issues in science, let it not now be guilty of ignoring sociological issues in science. A collaborative view ought also to include the sociological study of cultural milieu in which scientific ideas arise. In other words, an external sociological perspective on science. The logic of discovery from a sociological point of view implies that conceptual change can also be viewed from a sociological perspective.

Keywords

Cognitive Psychology Science Education Research Effort Scientific Knowledge Research Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AAAS: 1989, Project 2061: Science for All Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
  2. Adams III, H.H.: 1986, African and African-American Contributions to Science and Technology. In The Portland African-American Baseline Essays, Portland, OR: Portland Public Schools.Google Scholar
  3. Atwater, M.: 1991, Reform in Science Education-Assumptions and Alternative Views: Multicultural Science Education. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Lake Geneva, WI.Google Scholar
  4. Bailin, S.: 1990, ‘Creativity, Discovery, and Science Education: Kuhn and Feyerabend revisited’, Interchange, 21(3), 34–44.Google Scholar
  5. Bamford, C.: 1983, Book Review: ‘Beyond the Post-Modern Mind’ by Huston Smith, Teachers College Record, 84(3), 761–763.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, B.: 1990, ‘Sociological Theories of Scientific Knowledge’, in R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie & M.J.S. Hodge (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science, Routledge, New York, 60–73.Google Scholar
  7. Bloom, J.W.: 1991, Contexts of Meaning and the Development of Knowledge in Elementary School Children. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  8. Burbules, N.C. & Linn, M.C.: 1991, ‘Science Education and Philosophy of Science: Congruence or Contradiction?’, International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 227–241.Google Scholar
  9. Burtt, E.A.: 1967, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. London, UK: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar
  10. California: 1990, Science Framework for California Public Schools: Kindergarten Through Grade Twelve. Sacramento, CA: California State Board of Education.Google Scholar
  11. Clement, J.: 1982, ‘Student Preconceptions in Introductory Mechanics’, American Journal of Physics, 50(1): 66–71.Google Scholar
  12. Cobern, W.W.: 1991, World View Theory and Science Education Research, NARST Monograph No. 3. Cincinnati, OH: National Association for Research in Science Teaching.Google Scholar
  13. Cobern, W.W.: 1993a, ‘College Students' Conceptualizations of Nature: An Interpretive World View Analysis’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 935–951.Google Scholar
  14. Cobern, W.W.: 1993b, ‘Contextual Constructivism: The Impact of Culture on the Learning and Teaching of Science’, in K.G. Tobin (ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC, 51–69.Google Scholar
  15. Cobern, W.W.: 1994, ‘Point: Belief, Understanding, and the Teaching of Evolution’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 583–590.Google Scholar
  16. D'Ambrosio, U.: 1991, On Ethnoscience, CIMEC, Compinas, Brazil.Google Scholar
  17. Darwin, F. (ed.): 1888, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, John Murray, London, UK.Google Scholar
  18. Desmond, A. & Moore, J.: 1991, Darwin — The Life of a Tormented Evolutionist. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  19. Dobzhansky, T.: 1973, ‘Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution’, The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.Google Scholar
  20. Duschl, R.A.: 1985, ‘Science Education and the Philosophy of Science: Twenty-Five Years of Mutually Exclusive Development’, School Science and Mathematics, 85(7), 541–555.Google Scholar
  21. Duschl, R.A., Hamilton, R. & Grandy, R.E.: 1990, ‘Psychology and Epistemology: Match or Mismatch when Applied to Science Education’, International Journal of Science Education, 3(12): 230–243.Google Scholar
  22. Duschl, R.A. & Hamilton, R.J. (eds.): 1992, Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  23. Eby, L.: 1991, ‘Reflections on the Philosophy of Science: The Demise of Justificationism’, The World & I, 6(9): 531–545.Google Scholar
  24. Feyerabend, P.K.: 1993, Against Method (3rd ed.). New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  25. Foster, M.B.: 1934, ‘The Christian Doctrine of Creation and the Rise of Modern Science’, Mind, XLIII, 446–468.Google Scholar
  26. Fuller, S.: 1991, Social Epistemology. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Garrison, J.W. & Bentley, M.L.: 1990, ‘Science Education, Conceptual Change and Breaking with Everyday Experience’, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 10(1): 19–35.Google Scholar
  28. Gauld, C.: 1989, ‘A Study of Pupil's Responses to Empirical Evidence’, in R. Millar (ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education, The Falmer Press, Philadelphia, PA, 62–82.Google Scholar
  29. Geertz, C.: 1973, The Interpretation of Culture. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Giarelli, J.M.: 1993, ‘Forward’, in N. Noddings, Educating for Intelligent Belief or Unbelief, Teachers College Press, New York, ix-x. Gillespie, N.C.: 1979, Charles Darwin and the Problem of Creation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Greene, J.C.: 1981, Science, Ideology, and Worldview. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hawkins, D.: 1978, ‘Critical Barriers to Science Learning’, Outlook, 3: 3–25.Google Scholar
  33. Hills, G.L.C.: 1989, ‘Students' “Untutored” Beliefs about Natural Phenomena: Primitive Science or Commonsense?’, Science Education, 73(2): 155–186.Google Scholar
  34. Hills, G.L.C. & McAndrews, B.: 1987, ‘David Hawkins, Critical Barriers and the Education of Elementary School Science Teachers’, in J.D. Novak (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 21–223.Google Scholar
  35. Hodson, D.: 1993, ‘In Search of a Rationale for Multicultural Science Education’, Science Education, 77(6), 685–711.Google Scholar
  36. Jaki, S.L.: 1983, Angels, Apes & Men. Peru, IL: Sherwood Sugden & Company.Google Scholar
  37. Kawasaki, K.: 1990, ‘A Hidden Conflict between Western and Traditional Concepts of Nature in Science Education in Japan’, Bulletin of the School of Education Okayama University, 83: 203–214.Google Scholar
  38. Keller, E.F.: 1987, ‘Feminism and Science’, in S. Harding & J. O'barr (eds.), Sex and Scientific Inquiry, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 233–246.Google Scholar
  39. Kelly, G.J., Carlsen, W.S. & Cunningham, C.M.: 1993, ‘Science Education in Sociocultural Context: Perspectives from Sociology of Science’, Science Education, 77(2), 207–220.Google Scholar
  40. Koballa, T.R.J.: 1992, ‘Persuasion and Attitude Change in Science Education’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 63–80.Google Scholar
  41. Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lawson, A.E. & Weser, J.: 1990, ‘The Rejection of Nonscientific Beliefs about Life: Effects of Instruction and Reasoning Skills’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(6): 589–606.Google Scholar
  43. Lawson, A.E. & Worsnop, W.A.: 1991, ‘Learning about Evolution and Rejecting a Belief in Special Creation: Effects of Reflective Reasoning Skill, Prior Knowledge, Prior Belief and Religious Commitment’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2): 143–166.Google Scholar
  44. Lewis, C.S.: 1947, The Abolition of Man, MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  45. Lightman, A.P.: 1989, ‘Magic on the Mind: Physicists' Use of Metaphor’, The American Scholar, 58(1): 97–101.Google Scholar
  46. Linn, M.C. & Songer, N.B.: 1991, ‘Cognitive and Conceptual Change in Adolescence’, American Journal of Education, 99(4): 379–417.Google Scholar
  47. Matthews, M.R.: 1994, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Millar, R. (ed.): 1989, Doing Science: Images of Science in Science Education, The Falmer Press, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  49. Muscari, P.G.: 1988, ‘The Metaphor in Science and in the Science Classroom’, Science Education, 72(4), 423–431.Google Scholar
  50. Numbers, R.L.: 1992, The Creationists. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  51. Ogawa, M.: 1989, ‘Beyond the Tacit Framework of “Science” and “Science Education” among Science Educators’, International Journal of Science Education, 11(3): 247–250.Google Scholar
  52. Ogawa, M.: 1991, Personal communication.Google Scholar
  53. Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F. & Gilbert, J.K.: 1983, ‘Science Teaching and Children's Views of the World’, European Journal of Science Education, 5(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  54. Outram, D.: 1990, ‘A Book Review of “Cultural History: Between Practices and Representations” by Roger Chartier’, ISIS, 81(307), 327–328.Google Scholar
  55. Phelan, P., Davidson, A.L. & Cao, H.T.: 1991, ‘Students' Multiple Worlds: Negotiating the Boundaries of Family, Peer, and School Cultures’, Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 22(3): 224–249.Google Scholar
  56. Plantinga, A.: 1991, ‘When Faith and Reason Clash: Evolution and the Bible’, Christian Scholar's Review, XXI(1), 8–33. Popper, K.R.S.: 1968, Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Harper & Row, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  57. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P. & Gertzog, W.: 1982, ‘Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Toward a Theory of Conceptual Change’, Science Education, 66, 211–227.Google Scholar
  58. Roth, W. & Alexander T.: 1993, God and the Devil in High School Science: A Case Study of Students' Scientific and Religious Beliefs Accounted for by Means of Interpretive Repertoires. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  59. Shapin, S.: 1982, ‘History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions’, History of Science, XX, 157–211.Google Scholar
  60. Sheler, J.L. & Schrof, J.M.: 1991, December 23, ‘The Creation: Some Theologians are Trying to Make Room for Scientific Data on Human Origins’, U.S. News & World Report, 111(26), 56–64.Google Scholar
  61. Showers, D.: 1993, An Examination of the Science Literacy of Scientists and Science Educators. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA, 1993, April 15–19Google Scholar
  62. Slezak, P.: 1994, ‘The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Science Education’, Science & Education, 3(3,4).Google Scholar
  63. Solomon, J.: 1989, ‘The Social Construction of School Science’, in R. Millar (ed.), Doing Science: Images of Science in Science Education, The Falmer Press, Philadelphia, PA, 126–136.Google Scholar
  64. Smolicz, J.J. & Nunan, E.E.: 1975, ‘The Philosophical and Sociological Foundations of Science Education: The Demythologizing of School Science’, Studies in Science Education, 2, 101–143.Google Scholar
  65. Strike, K.A. & Posner, G.J.: 1992, ‘A Revisionist Theory of Conceptual Change’, in R.A. Duschl & R.J. Hamilton (eds.), Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice, SUNY Press, Albany, NY, 147–176.Google Scholar
  66. Tax, S.: 1983, ‘Reconciling Evolution and Creation’, Society, 20(2), 36–39.Google Scholar
  67. Wheatley, G.H.: 1991, ‘Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning’, Science Education, 75(1): 9–21.Google Scholar
  68. Wittgenstein, L.: 1958, Philosophical Investigations (3rd edition). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  69. Van Till, H.J. (ed.): 1990, Portraits of Creation: Biblical and Scientific Perspectives on the World's Formation, William B. Eerdmanns, Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • William W. Cobern
    • 1
  1. 1.College of EducationArizona State University WestPhoenixU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations