Synthese

, Volume 21, Issue 3–4, pp 386–398 | Cite as

Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory

  • W. V. Quine
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paul Postal, review of Dixon, Language, 84–93, specifically p. 88.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Noam Chomsky, ‘Quine's Empirical Assumptions’, Synthese 19 (1968) 53–68, specifically p. 57.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. V. Quine, ‘Replies’, Synthese 19 (1968) 264–321, specifically p. 280.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paul Postal, op. cit., ‘ note 12.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peter Geach, ‘Logical Procedures and the Identity of Expressions’, Ratio 7 (1965) 199–205, specifically p. 201.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arne Næss, Interpretation and Preciseness, Dybwad, Oslo, 1953.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jerry Fodor and Jerrold Katz, ‘The Structure of a Semantic Theory’, Language 39 (1963) 170–210.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. S. Stevens, ‘On the Psychophysical Law’, Psychological Review 64 (1957) 153–181.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Apostel, W. Mays, A. Morf, and J. Piaget, Les liaisons analytiques et synthétiques dans le comportement du sujet, Presses Universitaires, Paris 1937.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jerrold Katz, ‘Some Remarks on Quine on Analyticity’, Journal of Philosophy 64 (1967) 36–52.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anders Wedberg, ‘On the Principles of phonemic Analysis’, Ajatus 26 (1964) 235–253.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peter Geach, Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 1962.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. F. Strawson, ‘Singular Terms and Predication’, Synthese 19 (1968) 97–117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. V. Quine

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations