Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 143–152 | Cite as

Application of lime and wood ash to decrease acidification of forest soils

  • K. J. Meiwes
Article

Abstract

Liming and wood ash application are measures to decrease acidification of forests soils. The assessment of lime requirement can be based on that base saturation, which indicates a low risk of acid toxicity. Because of a wide spread Mg deficiency in Central European forests, Mg containing lime is normally applied. Ash from untreated wood is applied to decrease soil acidity as well as to improve K and P nutrition. In wood ash, K is the most soluble nutrient, follwed by Ca and Mg. The overall dissolution rate of lime applied to the forest floor is about 1t ha−1 a−1. After liming, soil solution alkalinity and Mg concentrations increase markedly, while changes of Ca, H ions and Al concentrations are less pronounced. After the application of wood ash, K concentrations increase due to the high K content and the high solubility of K in wood ash. After the application of a sufficiently high dosage of lime to the forest floor, the decrease of acidity in deeper soil layers may need decades because of the low solubility of lime. Nitrification and nitrate leaching induced by lime or wood ash may reduce their acid buffering efficiency.

Keywords

Acidity Lime Leaching Alkalinity Forest Soil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, F., Bramryd,T., Liljelund, L.E., Nihlgard, S.I., Nilson, H., Persson, H., Persson, T., Popovic, B., Söderström, B.: 1988, in Andersson, F, Persson T. (eds.) Nat. Swedish Environ. Prot. Board, Report 3518, 115–120Google Scholar
  2. Beese, F.: 1986, Göttinger Bodenk. Ber, 90, 1 -344Google Scholar
  3. Beese, F.: 1989, Ber. d. Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme, Göttingen, Reihe A, 49Google Scholar
  4. Büttner, G. and Valerius, H.: 1994, in: Matschullat, J., Heinrichs, H., Schneider, J. und Ulrich, B. (eds.), Gefahr für Ökosysteme und Wasserqualität — Ergebnisse interdisziplinärer Forschung im Harz. Springer-Verlag Berlin, 432–450Google Scholar
  5. Brown, B.A., Munsell, R.I., Holt, R.F.and King, A.V.: 1956 Soil Sci. Soc. Proc. 20, 518–522Google Scholar
  6. Busenberg, E. and Plummer, L.N. 1982, Am. J. Sci. 282, 45 - 78Google Scholar
  7. Cronan, C.S., Grigal, D.F.: 1995, J. Environm. Qual. 24, 209 - 226Google Scholar
  8. Derome, J., Kukkola, M., Mälkönen, E.: 1986: Nat. Swedish Environm. Prot. Board, Report 3084Google Scholar
  9. Ellenberg, H.: 1978, Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer Sicht. 2nd ed. Eugen Ulmer. StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  10. Elphick, B.L.: 1955, N.Z.J.Sci. Techn. 37 A, 156 - 718Google Scholar
  11. Hartmann F.K., Jahn, G.: 1967, Waldgesellschaften des mitteleuropäischen Gebirgsraumes nördlich der Alpen. Gustav Fischer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  12. Immer, A., Schmidt, W., Meiwes, K.J. and Beese, F., 1993: Forstwiss. Centralblatt 112, 334 - 346Google Scholar
  13. Kenk, G., Unfried, P., Evers, F.H. and Hildebrand E.E.: 1984, Forstw. Cbl. 103:307–320Google Scholar
  14. Khanna, P.K., Raison, R.J., and Falkiner, R.A.: 1994, Forest Ecol. Managem.66, 107 - 125Google Scholar
  15. Köble, R., Nagel, D., Smiatek, G., Werner, B. and Werner, L.: 1993, Kartierung der Critical Loads & Levels in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Abschlußbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben FE 108 02 080. Inst. f. Navigation, Universität StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  16. Kreutzer, K.: 1995, Plant Soil, 168–169, 447–470Google Scholar
  17. Kreutzer, K., Göttlein, A., Pröbstle, P., Zuleger.M.,: 1991, In: Kreutzer, K., Göttlein A. (eds.). Ökosystemforschung Höglwald. Forstwissenschaftl. Forschungen, 39, 11–21Google Scholar
  18. Lang, E.: 1986, Göttinger Bodenk. Ber. 89, 1 - 119Google Scholar
  19. Leube, F., Nebe, W., Jentzsch, S. and Fiedler, H.J. 1990: Forst u. Holz, 45, 625 - 626Google Scholar
  20. Marutzky, R.: 1991, WKI Bericht Nr. 26, Wilhelm-Klauditz-Institut, Eigenverlag BraunschweigGoogle Scholar
  21. Marschner, B., Renger, M., and Stahr, K.: 1991, Z. Pflanzenemährung Bodenk. 154, 343 - 348Google Scholar
  22. Matzner, E.: 1988, Ber. Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme/Waldsterben Göttingen, A 40Google Scholar
  23. Matzner, E., Khanna, P.K., Meiwes, K.J. and Ulrich, B.: 1985, Allg. Forstz., 41, 1143 - 1147Google Scholar
  24. Matzner, E., Meiwes, K.J.: 1991, Water Air Soil Poll. 54:377–390Google Scholar
  25. Meesenburg, H., Meiwes, K.J., Rademacher, P.: 1995, Water Air Soil Poll. (this Vol.)Google Scholar
  26. Meiwes, K.J., Khanna, P.K., Ulrich, B.: 1986, For. Ecol. Managem. 161 - 179Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, M.: 1992, Ber. Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme, Reihe A, Bd. 94Google Scholar
  28. Naumann, G.: 1938, Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenk. 14, 74 - 126Google Scholar
  29. Nihlgard, B., Nilsson, S.I., Popovic, B.: 1988, in: Andersson F. Persson T. (ed): Nat. Swedish Environ. Prot. Board. Report 3518, 27–39Google Scholar
  30. Otto, H.J..: 1994, Waldökologie, Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  31. Pietikäinen, J., Fritze, H.: 1995, Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 101 - 109Google Scholar
  32. Pohland, K., Strecker, M., Marutzky,R.: 1993, Chemosphere 26, 2121–2128Google Scholar
  33. Prenzel, J.: 1985, Allgemein. Forstzeitschrift, 41, 1142Google Scholar
  34. Reuss, J.O.: 1983, J. Environm. Qual. 12, 591 - 595Google Scholar
  35. Rosén, K., Eriksson, H., Clarholm, M., Kundkuist, H., Rudebeck, A. 1993: R 26, NUTEK, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  36. Sauter, U. 1991: Forstl. Forschungsber. München 114Google Scholar
  37. Schaaf W.: 1992, Bayreuther Bodenk. Ber. 23,1–124Google Scholar
  38. Schüler, G.: 1989, Allg. Forstzeitschrift 44, 975–978Google Scholar
  39. Spellmann, H., Meiwes, K.J.: 1995, Allgemeine Forstzeitschr. 50, 71 - 73Google Scholar
  40. Sverdrup, H., Warfinge, P.: 1993, Reports Ecology and Engineering, 2, Lund UniversityGoogle Scholar
  41. Sverdrup, H., Warfinge, P.: 1987, SNV Report 3311, Swedish Environm. Protection Board (SNV), Solna, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  42. Türk, T.: 1992, Bayreuther Bodenk. Ber. 21, 1 - 252Google Scholar
  43. Ulrich, B., 1995: Forstarchiv 66, 117 - 127Google Scholar
  44. Ulrich, B., Puhe, J.: 1994, In: Enquete-Kommission “Schutz der Erdatmosphäre” des Dt. Bundestages (Hrsg), Studienprogramm Bd. 2 Wälder, Economia Verlag, BonnGoogle Scholar
  45. Wedepohl, K.H.: 1992, Handbook of geochemistry, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wenzel, B.: 1989, Ber. Forschungszentrum Waldökosysteme Göttingen, A 51, 1 - 274Google Scholar
  47. Wittich, W.: 1943, Forstarchiv 19, 1 - 18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. J. Meiwes
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Experiment Station of Lower SaxonyGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations