Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 85, Issue 3, pp 1317–1324

Are seedlings reasonable surrogates for trees? An analysis of ozone impacts on Quercus rubra

  • J. M. Kelly
  • L. Samuelson
  • G. Edwards
  • P. Hanson
  • D. Kelting
  • A. Mays
  • S. Wullschleger
Part III Direct Effects of Air Pollutants on Vegetation

Abstract

The appropriateness of using seedling responses to predict mature tree responses to ozone is questionable considering the long life span of trees. To determine if northern red oak (Quercus rubra L.) seedlings and mature trees respond similarly to ozone, 30-year-old trees and two-year-old seedlings were fumigated with subambient, ambient, and twice ambient concentrations of ozone for three growing seasons using an open-top chamber facility. Ozone reduced leaf physiological function of mature trees. However, stem diameter growth and leaf mass of mature trees were not significantly reduced by ozone. Photosynthesis in seedling leaves was slightly reduced by ozone, but seedling growth and biomass were unaffected. Mature tree fine-root biomass responded negatively to increasing ozone, while seedlings exhibited increases in biomass. Carbon retention was enhanced in leaves and branches of mature trees by ozone treatment, while seedlings were unresponsive. Differences in ozone uptake, recurrent flushing and carbon dynamics rather than microclimate may explain differences in ozone sensitivity between seedlings and mature trees. These results indicate that seedlings may not reflect the ozone sensitivity of larger more physiologically mature trees.

Key words

Northern Red Oak Open-Top Chambers Plant Stress Photosynthesis Carbon Allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, C. P., Hogsett, W. E., Wessling, R. and Piocher, M.: 1991, Can. J. For. Res. 21, 1288–1291.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, T. R., Allen, H. L., Schoeneberger, M. M. and Kress, L. W.: 1994, Can. J. For. Res. 24, 453–461.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, G. S., Kelly, J. M. and Mays, P. A.: 1992, Water Air Soil Pollut. 63, 281–294.Google Scholar
  4. Edwards, G. S., Wullschleger, S. D., and Kelly, J. M.: 1994, Environ. Pollut. 83, 215–221.Google Scholar
  5. Enyedi, A. J., Eckardt, N. A. and Pell, E. J.: 1992, New Phytol 122, 493–500.Google Scholar
  6. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 1995a, Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants EPA/ORD Vol. II.Google Scholar
  7. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 1995b, Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants EPA/ORD Vol. I.Google Scholar
  8. Grier, C. C., Vogt, K. A., Keyes, M. R. and Edmonds, R. L.: 1981, Can. J. For. Res. 11, 155–167.Google Scholar
  9. Grulke, N. E. and Miller, P. R.: 1994, Tree Physiol. 14, 659–688.Google Scholar
  10. Hanson, P. J., Samuelson, L. J., Wullschleger, S. D., Tabberer, T. A., and Edwards, G. S.: 1994, Tree Physiol 14, 1351–1366.Google Scholar
  11. Heagle, A. S., Philbeck, R. B., Ferrell, R. E., and Heck, W. W.: 1989, J. Environ. Qual. 18, 361–368.Google Scholar
  12. Hogsett, W. E., Tingey, D. T., Hendricks, C. and Rossi, D.: 1989, p. 469–491 In. Olson, R. K and Lefohn, A. S. (ed.) Effects of Air Pollution on Western Forests, Air and Waste Management Assoc., Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  13. Kelly, J. M., Taylor, G. E., Edwards, N. T., Adams, M. B., Edwards, G. S. and Friend, A. L.: 1993, Water Air Soil Pollut. 69, 363–391.Google Scholar
  14. Kelting, D. L., Burger, J. A., and Edwards, G. S.: 1995, Ozone Effects on Red Oak Root Dynamics, Forest Ecol. Manage. (in press).Google Scholar
  15. Lechowicz, M. J.: 1987, Bot. Rev. 53, 281–300.Google Scholar
  16. Luwe, M. W. F., Takahama, U., and Heber, U.: 1993, Plant Physiol. 101, 969–976.Google Scholar
  17. Pye, J. M.: 1988, J. Environ. Qual. 17, 347–360.Google Scholar
  18. Reich, P. B., Schoettle, A. W., Amundson, R. G.: 1986, Environ. Pollut. 40, 1–15.Google Scholar
  19. Reich, P. B.: 1987, Tree Physiol. 3, 63–91.Google Scholar
  20. Reich, P. B., Schoettle, A. W., Stroo, H. F., and Amundson, R. G.: 1988, Can. J. Bot. 66, 1517–1531.Google Scholar
  21. Samuelson, L. J. and Edwards, G. S.: 1993, New Phytol. 125, 373–379.Google Scholar
  22. Samuelson, L. J.: 1994, New Phytol. 128, 235–241.Google Scholar
  23. Samuelson, L. J., Kelly, J. M., Mays, P. A., and Edwards, G. S.: 1995, Growth and Nutrition of Quercus Rubra L. Seedlings and Mature Trees After Three Seasons of Ozone Exposure, Environ. Pollut. (in press).Google Scholar
  24. Samuelson, L. J. and Kelly, J. M. 1996, Carbon Partitioning and Allocation in Northern Red Oak Seedlings and Mature Trees in Response to Ozone, Tree Physiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  25. Wullschleger, S. D., Hanson, P. J., Edwards, G. S. and Samuelson, L. J.: 1996, Growth and Maintenance Respiration in Leaves of Northern Red Oak Seedlings and Mature Trees After Three Years of Ozone Exposure, Plant Cell Environ. (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Kelly
    • 1
  • L. Samuelson
    • 2
  • G. Edwards
    • 1
  • P. Hanson
    • 3
  • D. Kelting
    • 4
  • A. Mays
    • 1
  • S. Wullschleger
    • 3
  1. 1.TVA, Atmospheric SciencesMorrisUSA
  2. 2.School of ForestryAuburn UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryUSA
  4. 4.College of Forestry and Wildlife ResourcesVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations