Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 943–948 | Cite as

Responses of phyto- and zooplankton to liming in a small acidified humic lake

  • M. Järvinen
  • K. Kuoppamäki
  • M. Rask
Part VI Freshwater Liming and Soil Mitigation

Abstract

Liming resulted in an immediate and transitory decrease of plankton biomass and phytoplankton primary production in the limed part of an acidified humic lake. In the longer term liming has changed species composition and dominance of phyto- and zooplankton. Due to increased transparency and improved oxygen conditions plankton biomass peaked deeper in the water column after liming. During the three years post-liming period phyto- and zooplankton communities have changed less than reported in several other studies. This is largely because liming was carried out well before the collapse of perch population, which has controlled zooplankton both in the pre- and post-treatment period.

Keywords

acidification liming phytoplankton zooplankton humic lake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Appelberg, M.: 1995, In: Henrikson, L. and Brodin, Y.W. (Eds.), Liming of acidified surface waters, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 283–308.Google Scholar
  2. Berzins, B. and Pejler, B.: 1987, Hydrobiologia 147, 107–116.Google Scholar
  3. Bukaveckas, P.: 1990, Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 24, 470–473.Google Scholar
  4. Cronberg, G., Lindmark, G. and Björk, S.: 1988, Hydrobiologia 161, 217–236.Google Scholar
  5. Degerman, E., Henrikson, L., Herrmann, J. and Nyberg, P.: 1995, In: Henrikson, L. and Brodin, Y. W. (Eds.), Liming of acidified surface waters, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg pp. 221–282.Google Scholar
  6. Ilmavirta, V.: 1988, Hydrobiologia 161, 255–270.Google Scholar
  7. Järvinen, M. and Rask, M.: 1992, Lammi Notes 19, 1–8.Google Scholar
  8. Järvinen, M.: 1993, Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 25, 534–538.Google Scholar
  9. Kauppi, P., Anttila, P. and Kenttämies, K. (Eds.): 1990, Acidification in Finland, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 1237 pp.Google Scholar
  10. Keller, W., Yan, N. D., Howell, T., Molot, L. A. and Taylor, W. D.: 1992, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49, 52–62.Google Scholar
  11. Keskitalo, J. and Salonen, K.: 1994, Manual of Integrated Monitoring, Publications of the Water and Environmental Administration —series B 16, Helsinki, Finland 41 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Larsson, S.: 1995, In: Henrikson, L. and Brodin, Y.W. (Eds.), Liming of acidified surface waters, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg pp. 192–220.Google Scholar
  13. Latja, R. and Salonen, K.: 1978, Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol. 20, 2556–2560.Google Scholar
  14. McCauley, E.: 1982, A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters, IBP Handbook 17, 228–265.Google Scholar
  15. Prepas, E.: 1978, Limnol Oceanogr, 23, 557–559.Google Scholar
  16. Rask, M.: 1991, Finnish Fish Res. 12, 25–34.Google Scholar
  17. Salonen, K.: 1979, Limnol. Oceanogr. 24, 177–183.Google Scholar
  18. Sarvala, J. and Halsinaho, S.: 1990, In: Kauppi, P., Anttila, P. and Kenttämies, K. (Eds.): Acidification in Finland, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg pp. 1009–1027.Google Scholar
  19. Zaret, T.M.: 1980, Predation and freshwater communities, New Haven, Yale Univ. Press 187 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Järvinen
    • 1
  • K. Kuoppamäki
    • 1
  • M. Rask
    • 2
  1. 1.Lammi Biological StationUniv. of HelsinkiLammiFinland
  2. 2.Evo Fisheries Research and AquacultureFinnish Game and Fisheries Research InstituteEvoFinland

Personalised recommendations