Acidification in Norway — Status and trends biological monitoring — Improvements in the invertebrate fauna
- 52 Downloads
- 9 Citations
Abstract
The Norwegian monitoring programme of acidification include studies of invertebrates, which started in 1981. The invertebrate programme is based on kick samples from a fixed station net in 8 river systems. The stations include tributaries as well as stations in the main river. This paper deals with three rivers located in a gradient covering the range of acidic deposition in West Norway. The invertebrates are identified to species level and sorted with respect to acid sensitive and acid tolerant species, used for stating an acidification index. The spring samples generally show the highest acidification due to release of acids during snow smelt. In fall the acidity was lower and the index was less variable. A significant increase in the acidification index (reduced acidity) was recorded during fall in the period 1989 – 94 in two of the watersheds. In the third watershed no significant trend was recorded. During the years 1982 – 1988 a significant increase in the index occurred in spring in the watershed with lowest acidic deposition. The increases observed in the index is probably a result of the reductions in acid deposition in Norway.
Key words
Rivers Acidification Monitoring Benthic invertebrates RecoveryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Drablos and Tollan, A. (Eds.).: 1980, Ecological Impact of acid precipitation, Ptoc. Int. Conf. Sandefjord, Norway. SNSF Project, Oslo-Ås, Norway.Google Scholar
- Engblom, E. and Lingdell, P.: 1984, Rep. Inst. Freshw. Res., Drottningholm, 61, 60–69.Google Scholar
- Fjellheim, A. and Raddum G.G.: 1990, The Science of the Totel Environment, 96, 57–66.Google Scholar
- Fjellheim, A. and Raddum G.G.: 1992, Environ. Pollut., 78, 173–178.Google Scholar
- Fjellheim, A. and Raddum G.G.: 1995, (This vol.)Google Scholar
- Frost, S., Huni, A. and Kershaw W.E.: 1971, Can. J. Zool, 49, 167–173.Google Scholar
- Henrikseu, A., Lien L., Traaen T. S.. Sevaldrud I.S. and Brakke D.F.: 1988, Ambio, 17,: 259–266.Google Scholar
- Hindar, A., Henriksen A., Tørseth K. and Semb A.: 1994, Nature 372, 327–328.Google Scholar
- Johannesen, M, Skartveit A, and Wright R.F.: 1980, Ecological Impact of acid precipitation. Proc. Int. Conf. Sandefjord, Norway. SNSF.Project, Oslo-Ås, Norway, 224–225.Google Scholar
- Johannessen, T.: 1995, (This vol)Google Scholar
- Meriläinen, J.J.: 1988, Ann. Zool. Fenn. 21, 89–104.Google Scholar
- Økland, J.:1980, Ecological Impact of add precipitation. Proc. Int. Conf. Sandefjord,Norway. SNSF.Project, Oslo- ØAs, Norway, 322–323Google Scholar
- Økland, K.A.: 1980, Ecological Impact of add precipitation. Proc. Int. Conf. Sandefjord, Norway. SNSF. Project, Oslo-Ås, Norway, 324–325Google Scholar
- Økland, J.: 1990, Lakes and snails, Universal Book Services / Dr. W. Backhuys, Oegstgeest.Google Scholar
- Overein, L.N., Seip H.M. and.Tollan A.: 1980, FR 19/80, SNSF.Project, Oslo-Ås, Norway, 175pp.Google Scholar
- Raddum, G.G: 1979, IR 45/79, SNSF.Project, Oslo-Ås, Norway, 1–58.Google Scholar
- Raddum, G.G., Fjellheim A.: 1984, Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol., 22, 1973–1980.Google Scholar
- Raddum, G.G., Fjellheim A. and Hesthagen T.: 1988, Verh. Int. Verein. Limnol., 23, 2291–2297.Google Scholar
- SFT, State Pollution Control.: 1994, State Program for Pollution Control, 583/93, 1–271 (In Norwegian)Google Scholar
- Tørseth, K. and Semb A.: 1995, (This vol.)Google Scholar