Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 239–269 | Cite as

Propagation functions for monitoring distributional changes

  • Amarjot Kaur
  • Loredana Di Consiglio
  • Ganapati P. Patil
  • Charles Taillie
Papers

Abstract

In environmental assessment and monitoring, a primary objective of the investigator is to describe the changes occurring in the environmentally important variables over time. Propagation functions have been proposed to describe the distributional changes occurring in the variable of interest at two different times. McDonald et al. (1992, 1995) proposed an estimator of propagation function under the assumption of normality. We conduct a detailed sensitivity analysis of inference based on the normal model. It turns out that this model is appropriate only for small departures from normality whereas, for moderate to large departures, both estimation and testing of hypothesis break down. Non-parametric estimation of the propagation function based on kernel density estimation is also considered and the robustness of the choice of bandwidth for kernel density estimation is investigated. Bootstrapping is employed to obtain confidence intervals for the propagation function and also to determine the critical regions for testing the significance of distributional changes between two sampling epochs. Also studied briefly is the mathematical form and graphical shape of the propagation function for some parametric bivariate families of distributions. Finally, the proposed estimation techniques are illustrated on a data set of tree ring widths.

Keywords

bandwidth bootstrapping density estimation kernel estimation logical regression non-parametric methods selection function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R. (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Fahrmeir, L. and Tutz, G. (1991) Multivariate Statistical Modeling Based on Generalized Linear Models. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Gove, J.H. and Houston, D.R. (1995) Monitoring the growth of american beech affected by beech bark disease in Maine using Kalman filter. Preprint, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  4. Hall, P. (1992) The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Houston, D. R. (1994) Major new tree disease epidemics: beech bark disease. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 32, 75–87.Google Scholar
  6. Johnson, M.E. (1987) Multivariate Statistical Simulation. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson, N.L. and Kotz, S. (1972) Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Kaur, A., di Consiglio, L., Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (1995) Propagation functions for monitoring distributional changes. Technical Report Number 94-0405, Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802.Google Scholar
  9. Manly, B.F.J. (1985) The Statistics of Natural Selection by Animal Populations. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  10. Manly B.F.J., McDonald, L. and Thomas, D. (1993) Resource Selection by Animals. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  11. McDonald, L., Gonzalez, L. and Manly, B.F.J. (1992) Statistical inference procedures for probability selection functions in long term monitoring programs. EMAP Final Report, USEPA, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
  12. McDonald, L., Gonzalez, L. and Manly, B.F.J. (1995) Using selection functions to describe changes in environmental variables. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2(3) (to appear).Google Scholar
  13. Nadaraya, E.A. (1964) On estimation regression. Theory of Probability and its Applications, 9, 141–2.Google Scholar
  14. Silverman, B.W. (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Watson, G.S. (1964) Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya, Series A, 26, 359–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amarjot Kaur
    • 1
  • Loredana Di Consiglio
    • 1
  • Ganapati P. Patil
    • 1
  • Charles Taillie
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Statistical Ecology and Environmental Statistics, Department of StatisticsPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations