Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 181–190 | Cite as

Conditional and unconditional estimators of population size

  • Fred L. Ramsey
  • Virginia M. Lesser
Papers
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Estimators for the population sizes of animal species are similar to Horvitz-Thompson estimators — they involve dividing counts of detected animals by the probabilities of detection. Knowing detection probabilities for different subpopulations allows one to estimate each sub-population size with such an estimator, and to add the results for an estimator of the total population. In the case where the proportions of animals belonging to the different sub-populations are also known, this paper shows that using those proportions to arrive at a common average detection probability will, when used in conjunction with the total number of animals detected, result in a better estimator. We provide two examples where the inferior estimator may seem sensible.

Keywords

detectability line transects Horvitz-Thompson estimators variable circular plots 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R. and Laake, J.L. (1980) Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monograph No. 72. Wildlife Society, Blacksburg, Virginia.Google Scholar
  2. Hayne, D.W. (1949) An examination of the strip census method for estimating animal populations. Journal of Wildlife Management, 13, 145–57.Google Scholar
  3. Lesser, V.M. and Bodenroeder, P. (1994) Procedures and analysis of data collected for the 1993 Oregon Parks and Recreation survey. Technical Report, Survey Research Center, Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331.Google Scholar
  4. Ramsey, F.L., Wildman, V.J. and Engbring, J. (1987) Covariate adjustments of effective area in variable area wildlife surveys. Biometrics, 43, 1–11.Google Scholar
  5. Ramsey, F.L., Gates, C.E., Patil, G.P. and Taillie, C. (1988) On transect sampling to assess wildlife populations and marine resources. In P.R. Krishnaiah and C.R. Rao (eds) Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 6. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  6. Reynolds, R.T., Scott, J.M. and Nussbaum, R.A. (1980) A variable circular plot method for estimating bird numbers. Condor 82, 309–13.Google Scholar
  7. Särndal, C.E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. (1992) Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Scott, J.M., Ramsey, F.L. and Kepler, C.B. (1986) Forest Bird Communities of the Hawaiian Islands: Their Dynamics, Ecology and Conservation. Studies in Avian Biology, No. 9.Google Scholar
  9. Seber, G.A.F. (1982) The Estimation of Animal Abundance, 2nd edn. Griffin, London.Google Scholar
  10. Thompson, S.K. (1992) Sampling. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Thompson, S.K. and Seber, G.A.F. (1994) Detectability in conventional and adaptive sampling. Biometrics, 50, 712–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred L. Ramsey
    • 1
  • Virginia M. Lesser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations