Twelve months of experience with Bioplastique
- 38 Downloads
- 12 Citations
Abstract
Over a 12-month period, 40 patients were treated for various facial defects using a new, injectable microimplant material-BioplastiqueTM. Areas treated included cheeks, chins, lips, nasolabial lines, nasoglabellar lines, infraoral lines, noses, and miscellaneous depressions. Patients were observed for overcorrection, inflammation, morbidity, allergic reaction, or other complications. Both patient and physician satisfaction were recorded. Use of Bioplastique was found to offer permanent results by means of a quick, simple procedure administered under local anesthesia without scarring. With proper training and a good “eye,” subtle corrections are possible. The author anticipates wide application of Bioplastique for the treatment of numerous soft tissue deficiencies.
Key words
Bioplastique Microimplant material Facial defectsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Callahan MA, Callahan A: Ophthalmic Plastic and Orbital Surgery. Birmingham, AL: Aesculapius Publishing Co., 1979 p 177Google Scholar
- 2.Ersek RA: Transplantation of purified autologous fat: a 3-year follow-up is disappointing. Plast Reconstr Surg 87(2):219–227, 1991Google Scholar
- 3.Ersek RA, Beisang AA III: BioplastiqueTM: A new textured polymer microparticle promises permanence in soft tissue augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:693–702, 1991Google Scholar
- 4.Habal MB: The biologic basis for the clinical application of the silicones. Arch Surg 119:843–848, 1984Google Scholar
- 5.Kornblut AD, Stark TW, Vap JG, deFries HO: The role of autografts homografts, heterografts and alloplastic implants in reconstructive head and neck surgery. Symp Plast Surg Face Otolaryngol Clin N Am 15(1):147–160, 1982Google Scholar
- 6.Lemperle G, Ott H, Charrier U, Hecker J, Lemperle M: PMMA microspheres for intradermal implantation: Part I. animal research. Ann Plast Surg 26(1):57–63, 1991Google Scholar
- 7.Muscona R: Free fat injections for the correction of hemifacial atrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(3):501–507, 1989Google Scholar
- 8.Peer LA: Loss of weight and volume in human fat grafts, with postulation of a “cell survival theory.” Plast Reconstr Surg 18:233, 1956Google Scholar
- 9.Schultz RC: Reconstruction of facial deformities using silicones and acrylics. Biomaterials in Reconstructive Surgery. St. Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1983, pp 437–473Google Scholar
- 10.Stegman SJ, Tromovitch TA: Implantation of collagen for depressed scars. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 6(6):450–453, 1980Google Scholar
- 11.Symmers WStC: Silicone mastitis in “topless” waitresses and some other varieties of foreign-body mastitis. Br Med J 19–22, 6 July 1968Google Scholar
- 12.The prevention of postoperative adhesions between the cortex and dura. Univ Penn Med Bull 22:57–61, 1909Google Scholar
- 13.Travis WE, Balogh K, Abraham JL: Silicone granulomas: Report of three cases and review of the literature. Hum Pathol 16:19, 1985Google Scholar
- 14.Trentham DE: Adverse reactions to bovine collagen implants. Arch Dermatol 122:643–644, 1986Google Scholar
- 15.van Blitterswijk CA, Grote JJ et al: Macropore tissue ingrowth: a quantitative and qualitative study on hydroxyapatite ceramic. Biomaterials 7:137–143, 1986Google Scholar
- 16.Vilar SB: An old story: an ivory nasal implant. Aesth Plast Surg 11:157, 1987Google Scholar
- 17.Wilson J, Merwin GE: Biomaterials for facial bone augmentation: comparative studies. J Biomed Mat Res Appl Biomat 22(A2):159–177, 1988Google Scholar
- 18.Zyplast® Implant Physician Package Insert, Collagen Corporation, Palo Alto, CA, 1985, 1987Google Scholar