Advertisement

Archives of oto-rhino-laryngology

, Volume 236, Issue 2, pp 203–210 | Cite as

Loudness recruitment: Contributing mechanisms as revealed by cochlear AP measures in man

  • R. V. Harrison
  • J. -M. Aran
Article

Summary

A measure of the (average) rate of discharge versus intensity function of cochlear fibers can be obtained from cochlear-evoked compound action potentials using a tone-on-tone forward masking technique. The rationale for the method is presented. This technique was used to investigate, indirectly, cochlear fiber responses in human subjects, both with normal hearing and with deafness of cochlear origin and showing signs of loudness recruitment. In animals with pathologic cochleas, the change in rate of fiber discharge with intensity is more rapid than in normal animals. The present study confirms that this also is the case in human cochlear pathology and suggests that this abnormal steepening of rate versus intensity functions contributes to the phenomenon of loudness recruitment.

Key words

Loudness recruitment Cochlear pathology Cochlear nerve fibers Intensity functions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbas PG, Gorga MP (1981) AP responses in forward masking paradigms and their relationship to responses of auditory nerve fibers. J Acoust Soc Am 69: 492–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aran J-M, Portmann CL, Delaunay J, Pelerin J, Lenoir J (1969) L'electrocochleogramme: methodes et premiers résultats chez l'enfant. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 90: 615–634Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dix MR, Hallpike CS, Hood JD (1948) Observations upon the loudness recruitment phenomenon, with especial reference to the differential diagnosis of disorders of the internal ear and VIIIth nerve. J Laryngol Otol 62: 671–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eggermont JJ (1977) Compound action potential tuning curves in normal and pathological human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 62: 1247–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evans EF (1972) The frequency response and other properties of single fibres in the guinea pig cochlear nerve. J Physiol (Lond) 226: 263–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans EF (1974) Auditory frequency selectivity and the cochlear nerve. In: Zwicker E, Terhardt E (eds) Facts and models in hearing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 118–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Evans EF (1975) The sharpening of cochlear frequency selectivity in the normal and abnormal cochlea. Audiology 14: 419–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowler EP (1936) A method for the early detection of otosclerosis. Arch Otolaryngol 8: 151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harris DM, Dallos P (1979) Forward masking of auditory nerve fiber responses. J Neurophysiol 42: 1083–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison RV (1981) Rate versus intensity functions and related AP responses in normal and pathological guinea pig and human cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am 70: 1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harrison RV, Evans EF (1977) The effect of hair cell loss (restricted to outer hair cells) on the threshold and tuning properties of cochlear fibres in the guinea pig. In: Portmann M, Aran J-M (eds) Inner ear biology, Coll INSERM 68. INSERM, Paris, pp 105–124Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harrison RV, Evans EF (1979) Cochlear fibre responses in guinea pigs with well defined cochlear lesions. Scand Audiol [Suppl] 9: 83–92Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrison RV, Aran J-M, Erre J-P (1981) AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas. J Acoust Soc Am 69: 1374–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harrison RV, Aran J-M, Negrevergne M (1981) The frequency selectivity of the normal and pathological human cochlea. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 230: 221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoekstra A, Ritsma RJ (1977) Perceptive hearing loss and frequency selectivity. In: Evans EF, Wilson JP (eds) Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. Academic Press, London, pp 283–292Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kiang NYS, Moxon EC, Levine RA (1970) Auditory nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Wolstenholme GEW, Knight J (eds) Sensorineural hearing loss. Churchill, London, pp 241–268Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leshowitz B, Lindstrom R (1977) Measurement of nonlinearities in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. In: Evans EF, Wilson JP (eds) Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. Academic Press, London, pp 283–292Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pick GF, Evans EF, Wilson JP (1977) Frequency resolution of patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. In: Evans EF, Wilson JP (eds) Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. Academic Press, London, pp 273–281Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Portmann M, Aran J-M, Lagourgue P (1973) Testing for “recruitment” by electrocochleography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 82: 36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sachs MB, Abbas PJ (1974) Rate versus level functions for auditory nerve fibres in cat: tone burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 56: 1835–1847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schimdt PH, Eggermont JJ, Odenthal DW (1974) Study of Ménière's disease by electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol [Suppl] (Stockh) 316: 75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith RL (1977) Short term adaptation in single nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. J Neurophysiol 40: 1098–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wightman F, McGee T, Kramer M (1977) Factors influencing frequency selectivity in normal and hearing impaired listeners. In: Evans EF, Wilson JP (eds) Psychophysics and physiology of hearing. Academic Press, London, pp 295–306Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. V. Harrison
    • 1
  • J. -M. Aran
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d'Audiologie Expérimentale, INSERM Unité 229Université de Bordeaux II, Hôpital PellegrinBordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations