Quality of Life Research

, Volume 3, Issue 5, pp 353–364 | Cite as

Psychometric properties and responsiveness of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in patients with breast, ovarian and lung cancer

  • D. Osoba
  • B. Zee
  • J. Pater
  • D. Warr
  • L. Kaizer
  • J. Latreille
Research Papers


The QLQ-C30, a health-related quality of life questionnaire developed for use in patients with cancer, has been previously validated in patients with lung cancer and head and neck cancer. In this study, further validation was carried out for 535 patients, including patients with breast cancer (n=143) and ovarian cancer (n=111) for whom there is no previously published validation, as well as patients with lung cancer (n=121). All patients were entered in one of two trials of anti-emetics to prevent chemotherapy-induced emesis. The QLQ-C30 was completed before chemotherapy and on day 8 after chemotherapy. The factor structure in patients with breast and ovarian cancer was similar to that previously described. Interdomain correlations, in the entire group, were strongest for the physical and role function domains and the fatigue, pain and global quality of life.domains before and after chemotherapy. In addition, after chemotherapy, social function was also strongly correlated with fatigue and global quality of life. These correlations were not always of equal strength in the breast, ovarian and lung groups, suggesting that there may be differences between these groups. The responsiveness of the QLQ-C30 in the presence of widely metastatic, as compared with locoregional, disease showed changes in the expected directions (i.e., diminished function in physical and social role functions and in global quality of life, with greater fatigue and pain in patients with metastatic disease). Eight days after chemotherapy, decreases were seen in physical, role and social functioning and in global quality of life, and there was greater fatigue, nausea and vomiting compared with before chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer had better physical, role and social functioning, and less fatigue and pain than patients with ovarian cancer. This result is expected, since many of the patients with breast cancer had early stage disease, whereas those with ovarian cancer had advanced stage disease. Mean scores for patients with lung cancer were between the other two groups, in keeping with the mixture of early and advanced stage disease in these patients. There was a strong correlation between ECOG performance status scores and several domains of the QLQ-C30; these were all in the expected directions. The results of this study confirm those in earlier studies on patients with lung cancer, and provide new information on patients with breast and ovarian cancer. In addition, the QLQ-C30 is responsive to the effects of chemotherapy and of metastatic disease.

Key words

Breast cancer EORTC QLQ-C30 healthrelated quality of life lung cancer ovarian cancer psychometric properties 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aaronson NK, Bakker W, Stewart AL et al. Multidimensional approach to the measurement of quality of life in lung cancer clinical trials. In: Aaronson NK, Beckmann J eds. The Quality of Life of Cancer Patients. New York: Raven Press, 1987; 63–82.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bullinger M et al. The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire: interim results of an international field study. In: Osoba D, ed. Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1991; 185–203.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365–76.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bergman B, Sullivan M, Sörenson S. Quality of life during chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. II. A longitudinal study of the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and comparison with the Sickness Impact Profile. Acta Oncol 1992; 31: 19–28.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bjordal K, Kaasa S. Psychometric validation of the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire, 30-item version and a diagnosis-specific module for head and neck cancer patients. Acta Oncol 1992; 31: 311–21.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ringdal GI, Ringdal K. Testing the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire on cancer patients with heterogeneous diagnoses. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 219–40.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Niezgoda HE, Pater JL. A validation study of the domains of the core EORTC Qual of Life Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 319–25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaizer L, Warr D, Hoskins P et al. The effect of schedule and maintenance on the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1050–7.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Graybill FA. Theory and Application of Linear Model. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Co, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morrison DF. Multivariate Statistical Methods. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16: 297–334.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller RG. Simultaneous statistical Inference. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Osoba
    • 1
  • B. Zee
    • 2
  • J. Pater
    • 2
  • D. Warr
    • 3
  • L. Kaizer
    • 4
  • J. Latreille
    • 5
  1. 1.British Columbia Cancer AgencyVancouverCanada
  2. 2.National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials GroupKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Princess Margaret HospitalTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Credit Valley HospitalMississaugaCanada
  5. 5.Hotel Dieu de MontrealMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations