European Radiology

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 108–112 | Cite as

Duplex Doppler ultrasound in carcinoid metastases

  • A. Elvin
  • T. Andersson
  • B. Eriksson
  • K. Öberg
Original Articles Gastrointestinal radiology
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

In a prospective study, the role of duplex Doppler ultrasound in monitoring interferon treatment-related changes in carcinoid metastases was evaluated. The Doppler findings from the tumours were correlated to the clinical and laboratory status of the patients to test the hypothesis that successful treatment results in increased vascular resistance. The patients were divided into 4 groups: untreated (n = 10), progressive disease (n = 17), stable disease (n = 20) and objective response (n = 18). In 7 cases Doppler evaluation was made before and after treatment. No significant difference in Doppler values were found between the groups, and at present duplex Doppler ultrasound does not seem to play a role in the evaluation of tumour therapy in carcinoid patients.

Key words

Doppler Carcinoid Therapy monitoring 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Öberg K, Norheim I, Lindh E, Jonsdottir B, Magnusson A, Lundquist G, Wide L, Alm G (1986) Treatment of malignant carcinoid tumours with human leucocyte interferon. Long term results. Cancer Treat Rev. 70: 1297Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andersson T, Wilander E, Eriksson B, Lindgren PG, Öberg K (1990) Effects of Interferon on tumor tissue content in liver metastases of carcinoid tumors. Cancer Res 50: 3413Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andersson T, Eriksson B, Hemmingsson A, Jung B, Lindh E, Thuomas K, Öberg K (1988) Effect of Interferon on T1 relaxation timed of liver metastases from endocrine gastrointestinal tumours. Acta Radiol 29: 21Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dvorak HF, Gresser I (1989) Microvascular injury in pathogenesis of Interferon-induced necrosis of subcutaneous tumors in mice. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 81: 497Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ramos IM, Taylor KJW, Kier R, Burns PN, Snower DP, Carter D (1988) Tumor vascular signals in renal masses: Detection with Doppler US. Radiology 168: 633Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor KJW, Ramos I, Morse SS, Fortune KL, Hammers L, Taylor CR (1987) Focal liver masses: Differential diagnosis with pulsed Doppler US. Radiology 164: 643Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor KJW, Ramos I, Carter D, Morse SS, Snower D, Fortune K (1988) Correlation of Doppler US tumor signals with neovascular morphologic features. Radiology 166: 57Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walker AW, Philips DJ, Powers JE (1982) Evaluating Doppler devices using a moving string test target. J. Clin. Ultrasound 10: 25Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nelson TR, Pretorius DH (1988) The Doppler signal: Where does it come from and what does it mean? AJR 151: 439Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MostbeckGH,GössingerHD,MallekR,SiostrzonekP,Schneider B, Tsholakoff D (1990) Effect of heart rate on Doppler measurements of resistive index in renal arteries. Radiology 175: 511Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Norheim I, Öberg K, Theodorsson-Norheim E, Lindgren PG, Lundqvist G, Magnusson A, Wide L, Wilander E (1987) Malignant carcinoid tumors: An analysis of 103 patients with regard to tumor localisation, hormone production and survival. Ann Surg 206: 115Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yasuhara K, Kimura K, Ohto M, Matsutani S, Ebara M, Tsuchiya Y, Saisho H (1988) Pulsed Doppler in the diagnosis of small liver tumours. Br. J. Radiol. 61: 898Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Viamonte M, Roen S, Lepage J (1973) Nonspecificity of abnormal vascularity in the angiographic diagnosis of malignant neoplasms. Radiology 106: 59Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shubik P (1982) Vascularization of tumors: A review. J Cancer Res Clin Incol 103: 211Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gammill SL, Shipkey FH, Himmelfarb EH, Parvey LS, Rabinowitz JG (1976) Roentgenology-pathology correlative study of neovascularity. AJR 126: 376Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ney FG, Feist JH, Altemus LR, Ordinario VR (1972) The characteristic angiographic criteria of malignancy. Radiology 104: 567Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitty HA, Warner RRP, Newman LH, Train JS, Parnes IH (1985) Control of carcinoid syndrome with hepatic artery embolization. Radiology 155: 623Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carrasco CH, Charnsangavej C, Ajani J, Samaan NA, Richli W, Wallace S (1986) The carcinoid syndrome: Palliation by hepatic artery embolization. AJR 147: 149Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Burns PN, Halliwell M, Wells PNT (1982) Ultrasonic Doppler studies of the breast. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 8: 127Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Elvin
    • 1
  • T. Andersson
    • 1
  • B. Eriksson
    • 2
  • K. Öberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Departments of Diagnostic RadiologyAkademiska Sjukhuset UppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Departments of Internal MedicineAkademiska Sjukhuset UppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations