Advertisement

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 173–179 | Cite as

Subclinical infection of the silicone breast implant surface as a possible cause of capsular contracture

  • Charles P. Virden
  • Marek K. Dobke
  • Paul Stein
  • C. Lowell Parsons
  • David H. Frank
Article

Abstract

In order to reexamine the possible association between bacterial presence and capsular contracture, 55 silicone devices (mammary implants or tissue expanders) were cultured at the time of their removal from 40 patients. Special culture techniques were used in an attempt to recover bacteria adhering to the smooth-surfaced implant and encased in glycocalyx biofilm. Bacteria were detected on 56% (15 of 27) of implants surrounded by contracted capsules and on 18% (5 of 28) of those without capsular contracture (p < 0.05). Only three implants tested positive using routine plating techniques. The predominant isolate was Staphylococcus epidermidis. The concept that capsular contracture is associated with subclinical infection of silicone implants is supported by this study. With changes in the microbiological technique, bacterial recovery and growth occurs at a frequency greater than previously thought.

Key words

Breast Implant Capsule Contracture Infection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blecourt RA de, Wijk M van, Zeeman RJ, Posma AN: Capsular contracture after augmentation mammaplasty: A retrospective study. Eur J Plast Surg 12:83, 1989Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bostwick J: Plastic and reconstructive breast surgery. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 1990, p 181Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brody GS, Latts JR: Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:48, 1981Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buret A, Ward KH, Olson ME, Costerton JW: An in vivo model to study the pathobiology of infectious biofilms on biomaterial surfaces. Biomed Mat Res 25:865, 1991Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkhardt B: Comparing contracture rates: probability theory and the unilateral contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:527, 1984Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burkhardt B: Fibrous capsular contracture around breast implants: the role of subclinical infection. Infect Surg 4:469, 1985Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burkhardt B, Dempsey PD, Schnur PL, Tofield JJ: Capsular contracture: a prospective study of the effect of local antibacterial agents. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:919, 1986Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burkhardt B, Fried M, Schnur PL, Tofield JJ: Capsules, infection and intraluminal antibiotics. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:43, 1981Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH: Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces. Infect Immun 37:318, 1982Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chuard C, Lucet JL, Rohner P, Herrmann M, Auckenthaler R, Waldvogel FA, Lew DP: Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus recovered from infected for eign body in vivo to killing by antimicrobials. J Infect Dis 163:1369, 1991Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastazi GW: The fate of breast implants with infections around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812, 1979Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edberg SC: Methods of quantitative microbiological analyses that support the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of human infection. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 8:339, 1981Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans RC, Holmes CJ: Effect of vancomycin hydrochloride on Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm associated with silicone elastomer. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:889, 1987Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Freedman A, Jackson IT: Infections in breast implants. Infect Dis Clin N Am 3:275, 1989Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson-d'Ambrosio RE, Samuel M, d'Ambrosio SM: A method for isolating large numbers of viable disaggregated cells from various human tissue for cell culture establishment. In Vitro Cell Develop Biol 22:529, 1986Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gray ED, Peters G, Verstegen M, Regelman WE: Effect of extracellular slime substance from Staphylococcus epidermidis on the human cellular immune response. Lancet 1:365, 1984Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gylbert L, Asplund O, Berggren A, Jurell G, Ransjo U, Ostrup L: Preoperative antibiotics and capsular contracture in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:260, 1990Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kalman PG, Ward CA, McKeown NB, McCullough D, Romaschin AD: Improved biocompatability of silicone rubber by removal of surface entrapped air nuclei. Biomed Mat Res 25:199, 1991Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lewis DL, Pope JD, Gattie DK, Said WA: Laboratory procedure for determining substrate removal rate coefficients for biofilms. J Microbiol Meth 10:103, 1989Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Loosdrecht MCH van, Lyklema J, Norde W, Zehnder AJB: Influence of interfaces on microbial activity. Microbiol Rev 54:75, 1990Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Marrie TJ, Costerton JW: Scanning and transmission microscopy of in situ bacterial colonization of intravenous and intraarterial catheters. J Clin Microbiol 19:687, 1984Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mattila T: A staining technique to measure capsular polysaccharides of Staphylococcus aureus on filter membrane. J Microbiol Meth 9:323, 1989Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McCauley RL, Riley WB, Juliano RA, Brown P, Evans MJ, Robson MC: In vitro alterations in human fibroblast behaviour secondary to silicone polymers. J Surg Res 49:103, 1990Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller S: Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:39, 1981Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Neerven ARW van, Wijfels RH, Zehnder AJB: Scanning electron microscopy of immobilized bacteria in gel beads: a comparative study of fixation methods. J Microbiol Meth 11:157, 1990Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nickel JC, Heaton J, Morales A, Costerton JW: Bacterial biofilm in persistent penile prosthesis—associated infection. J Urol 135:586, 1986Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Olesen LL, Ejlertsen T, Nielsen J: Toxic shock syndrome following insertion of breast prosthesis Br J Surg 78:585, 1991Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Parvis U, Sharpe AN, Bergener DM, Lachapelle G, Milling M, Sipiring F: Comparison of bacterial counts obtained from naturally contaminated foods by means of Stomacher Lab blender. Can J Microbiol 33:52, 1987Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pfaller MA, Herwaldt LA: Laboratory, clinical, and epidemiological aspects of coagulase-negative Staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 1:281, 1988Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roszak DB, Colwell RR: Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment. Microbiol Rev 51:365, 1987Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rudolph R, Woodward M: Absence of visible bacteria in capsules around silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 72:32, 1983Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sanger JR, Sheth NK, Franson TR: Adherence of microorganisms to breast prostheses: an in vitro study. Ann Plast Surg 22:337, 1989Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sutherland IW: Microbial exopolysaccarides-their role in microbial adhesion in aqueous systems. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol 10:173, 1983Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shah Z, Lehman JA, Tan J: Does infection play a role in breast capsular contracture? Plast Reconstr Surg 68:34, 1981Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sperber WH: The identification of Staphylococci in clinical and food microbiology laboratories. CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 15:121, 1977Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thomalla JV, Thompson ST, Rowland RG, Mulcahy JJ: Infectious complications of penile prosthetic implants. J Urol 138:65, 1987Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thornton JW, Argenta LC, McClatchey KD, Marks MW: Studies of the endogenous flora of the human breast. Ann Plast Surg 20:39, 1988Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Young EJ, Sugarman B: Infections in prosthetic devices. Surg Clin N Am 68:167, 1988Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles P. Virden
    • 1
  • Marek K. Dobke
    • 1
  • Paul Stein
    • 1
  • C. Lowell Parsons
    • 1
  • David H. Frank
    • 1
  1. 1.San DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations