Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Percutaneous nucleotomy

An alternative to spinal surgery

  • 29 Accesses

  • 18 Citations

Summary

As an alternative to the well-established surgical procedures for the treatment of disk herniation, percutaneous nucleotomy has proved to be very satisfactory. In several cases this approach has brought complete relief to the patient without sacrifice of bone and without causing soft tissue damage as would have been inevitable with the usual surgical methods. Percutaneous nucleotomy is also a true alternative to chemical nucleolysis when leakage of contrast agent into the spinal canal has already been observed during diskography. Furthermore, this method avoids disagreeable complications encountered in chemical nucleotomy, for example, anaphylactic shock or the escape of the nucleolytic agent into the spinal canal. The method basically consists of removing the nucleus pulposus (or a major part of it) by means of a forceps that is introduced to the site through a cannula. In this manner a reduction of volume of the disk is achieved. The procedure can easily be carried out under local anesthesia. This method should be avoided in the case of prolapse within the spinal canal and especially when displacement beyond the level of the disk has occurred. In the period between 1979 and 1985 we carried out percutaneous nucleotomies in 51 patients with herniation mostly combined with a narrow spinal canal orspondylolisthesis. The clinical results from 32 of 51 patients can be assessed as very good, good, or satisfactory. We consider the proportion of patients showing good clinical results to be high, bearing in mind that the indication was not just disk herniation alone but, in most cases, combined with other lumbar pathologies as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Bösch J (1969) Erfahrungen bei 1351 Bandscheibenoperationen aus 21 Jahren. Z Orthop 106:295

  2. 2.

    Feffer HL (1956) Treatment of low back and sciatic pain by the injection of hydrocortisone into degenerated intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 38:585

  3. 3.

    Finneson B (1973) Low back pain. Lippincott, Philadelphia

  4. 4.

    Graham CE (1976) Chemonucleolysis: a double-blind study comparing chemonucleolysis with intradiscal hydrocortisone. Clin Orthop 117:179

  5. 5.

    Gurdjian ES, Webster JE, Ostrowski AZ, Hardy WG, Linder W, Thomas LM (1961) Herniated intervertebral discs — an analysis of 1176 operated cases. J Trauma 1:158

  6. 6.

    Hijikata S (1975) Perkutane Nukleotomie — neue Behandlung der Diskushernie. J Toden Hosp 5:39

  7. 7.

    Hijikata S, Nakayama K, Yamagishi M, Ischihara S (1979) Percutaneus nucleotomie. Orthopedics Mook 11:246

  8. 8.

    Hult L (1950) Retroperitoneal disc fenestration in low back pain and sciatica. Acta Orthop Scand 20:342

  9. 9.

    LaMont RL, Morawa LG, Pederson MD (1976) Comparison of disc excision and spinal fusion for lumbar disc ruptures. Clin Orthop 121:212

  10. 10.

    Lenhard RE (1947) End-result study of the intervertebral disc. J Bone Joint Surg 29:425

  11. 11.

    Love JG (1947) The disc factor in low-back pain with or without sciatica. J Bone Joint Surg 29:438

  12. 12.

    Martins AN, Ramirez A, Johnston J, Schwetschenau PR (1978) Double-blind evaluation of chemonucleolysis for herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 49:816

  13. 13.

    McCulloch JA, McNab I (1983) Sciatica and chymopapain. Williams & Wilkins, London

  14. 14.

    O'Connell JEA (1951) Protrusions of the lumbar intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] : 8

  15. 15.

    Olsson SE (1950) Observations concerning disc fenestration in dogs. Acta Orthop Scand 20:349

  16. 16.

    Rydevik B (1976) Effects of chymopapain on nerve tissue. Spine 1:137

  17. 17.

    Schreiber A, Suezawa Y (1984) Transdiscoscopic percutaneous nucleotomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. First International Congress on Advances in Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, April 16–19, Palmspring, California

  18. 18.

    Schwetschenau P, Ramirez A, Johnston J, Barnes E, Wiggs C, Martins AN (1976) Double-blind evaluation of intradiscal chymopapain for herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 45: 622

  19. 19.

    Shealy CN (1967) Tissue reaction to chymopapain in cats. J Neurosurg 26:327

  20. 20.

    Smith L, Brown E (1967) Treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc lesion by direct injection of chymopapain. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 49:502

  21. 21.

    Smith L, Garvin PS, Gesler RM, Jennings RB (1963) Enzyme dissolution of the nucleus pulposus. Nature 198:1311

  22. 22.

    Spangfort EV (1972) The lumbar disc herniation, a computer-aided analysis of 2504 operations. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 142

  23. 23.

    Suezawa Y, Blasbalg DT, Brandenberg JE (1983) Perkutane Nukleotomie und Diskoskopie. Z Orthop 121:394

  24. 24.

    Suezawa Y, Langlotz M, Schreiber A (1984) Klinik und Radiologie der Lendenwirbelsäule in bezug auf Operationsindikation und -wahl. 32. Jahrestagung der Vereinigung Süddeutscher Orthopäden e.V., Baden-Baden

  25. 25.

    Suezawa Y, Rüttimann B (1983) Indikation, Methodik and Ergebnisse der perkutanen Nukleotomie bei lumbaler Diskushernie. Z Orthop 121:25

  26. 26.

    Sussman BJ (1973) Treatment with chymopapain. J Neurosurg 39:793

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to PD Dr. Y. Suezawa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suezawa, Y., Jacob, H.A.C. Percutaneous nucleotomy. Arch. Orth. Traum. Surg. 105, 287–295 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449928

Download citation

Keywords

  • Clinical Result
  • Soft Tissue
  • Contrast Agent
  • Tissue Damage
  • Major Part