Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Responsiveness of Western adults to pitch-distributional information in melodic sequences

  • 123 Accesses

Abstract

Responsiveness of musically trained and untrained adults to pitch-distributional information in melodic contexts was assessed. In Experiment 1, melodic contexts were pure-tone sequences, generated from either a diatonic or one of four nondiatonic tonesets, in which pitch-distributional information was manipulated by variation of the relative frequency of occurrence of tones from the toneset. Both the assignment of relative frequency of occurrence to tones and the construction of the (fixed) temporal order of tones within the sequences contravened the conventions of western tonal music. A probe-tone technique was employed. Each presentation of a sequence was followed by a probe tone, one of the 12 chromatic notes within the octave. Listeners rated the goodness of musical fit of the probe tone to the sequence. Probe-tone ratings were significantly related to frequency of occurrence of the probe tone in the sequence for both trained and untrained listeners. In addition, probe-tone ratings decreased as the pitch distance between the probe tone and the final tone of the sequence increased. For musically trained listeners, probe-tone ratings for diatonic sequences tended also to reflect the influence of an internalized tonal schema. Experiment 2 demonstrated that the temporal location of tones in the sequences could not alone account for the effect of frequency of occurrence in Experiment 1. Experiment 3 tested musically untrained listeners under the conditions of Experiment 1, with the exception that the temporal order of tones in each sequence was randomized across trials. The effect of frequency of occurrence found in Experiment 1 was replicated and strengthened.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 11, 629–654.

  2. Berry, W. (1976). Structural functions in music. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.

  3. Bharucha, J. J. (1984). Event hierarchies, tonal hierarchies, and assimilation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 421–425.

  4. Bharucha, J. J. (1987). Music cognition and perceptual facilitation: A connectionist approach. Music Perception, 5, 1–30.

  5. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  6. Bregman, A. S. (1993). Auditory scene analysis: hearing in complex environments. In S. McAdams & E. Bigand (Eds.), Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition (pp. 10–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  7. Butler, D. (1989). Describing the perception of tonality in music: A critique of the tonal hierarchy theory and a proposal for a theory of intervallic rivalry. Music Perception, 6, 219–242.

  8. Castellano, M. A., Bharucha, J. J., & Krumhansl, C. L. (1984). Tonal hierarchies in the music of north India. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 394–412.

  9. Cuddy, L. L. (1986). The harmony of melody. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Acoustics, Toronto, Canada.

  10. Cuddy, L. L. (1991). Melodic patterns and tonal structure: Converging evidence. Psychomusicology, 10, 107–126.

  11. Cuddy, L. L., & Badertscher, B. (1987). Recovery of the tonal hierarchy: Some comparisons across age and levels of musical experience. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 609–620.

  12. Cuddy, L. L., Cohen, A. J., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (1981). Perception of structure in short melodic sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 869–883.

  13. Cuddy, L. L., & Thompson, W. F. (1992). Asymmetry of perceived key movement in chorale sequences: Converging evidence from a probe-tone analysis. Psychological Research, 54, 51–59.

  14. Dowling, W. J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341–354.

  15. Dowling, W. J. (1991). Tonal strength and melody recognition after long and short delays. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 305–313.

  16. Dowling, W. J., & Harwood, D. L. (1986). Music cognition. Orlando, Fl.: Academic Press.

  17. Erikson, R. (1984). A perceptual substrate for tonal centering? Music Perception, 2, 1–5.

  18. Estes, W. K. (1976a). Some functions of memory in probability learning and choice behavior. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The new psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 10, pp. 2–45). New York: Academic Press.

  19. Estes, W. K. (1976b). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37–64.

  20. Fletcher, H., & Munson, W. A. (1933). Loudness, its definition, measurement and calculation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5, 82.

  21. Forte, A. (1973). The structure of atonal music. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  22. Frances, R. (1988). The perception of music. (W. J. Dowling, Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum (original work published 1958).

  23. Handel, S. (1989). Listening: An introduction to the perception of auditory events. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.

  24. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1984). Automatic processing of fundamental information: The case for frequency of occurrence. American Psychologist, 39, 1372–1388.

  25. Hughs, M. (1977). A quantitative analysis. In M. Yeston (Ed.), Readings in Schenker analysis and other approaches (pp. 144–164). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  26. Jones, M. R. (1982). Music as a stimulus for psychological motion: Part II. An expectancy model. Psychomusicology, 2(1), 1–13.

  27. Jordan, D. S., & Shepard, R. N. (1987). Tonal schemas: Evidence obtained by probing distorted musical scales. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 489–504.

  28. Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliff, NJ. Prentice Hall Inc.

  29. Kessler, E. J., Hansen, C., & Shepard, R. N. (1984). Tonal schemata in the perception of music in Bali and in the West. Music Perception, 2, 131–165.

  30. Knopoff, L., & Hutchinson, W. (1983). Entropy as a measure of style: The influence of sample length. Journal of Music Theory, 27, 75–97.

  31. Krumhansl, C. L. (1983). Perceptual structures for tonal music. Music Perception, 1, 28–62.

  32. Krumhansl, C. L. (1987). Tonal and harmonic hierarchies. In J. Sundberg (Ed.), Harmony and tonality (pp. 13–32). Stockholm, Sweden: Royal Swedish Academy.

  33. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990a). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  34. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990b). Tonal hierarchies and rare intervals in music cognition. Music Perception, 7, 309–324.

  35. Krumhansl, C. L., & Keil, F. C. (1982). Acquisition of the hierarchy of tonal functions in music. Memory & Cognition, 10, 243–251.

  36. Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 344–368.

  37. Krumhansl, C. L., & Shepard, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 579–594.

  38. Lerdahl, F. (1988). Tonal pitch space. Music Perception, 5, 315–350.

  39. Lerdahl, F. (1989). Atonal prolongational structure. Contemporary Music Review, 4, 65–87.

  40. Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

  41. Lynch, M. P., Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K., & Urbano, R. (1991). Influences of acculturation and musical sophistication on perception of native and nonnative musical scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 967–975.

  42. Maxwell, S. E., Camp, C. J., & Arvey, R. D. (1981). Measures of strength of association: A comparative examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 525–534.

  43. Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  44. Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures, the implication-realization model. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  45. Nosofsky, R. (1988). Similarity, frequency, and category representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 54–65.

  46. Oram, N. P. (1989). The responsiveness of Western adult listeners to pitch distributional information in diatonic and nondiatonic melodic sequences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.

  47. Pedhauzer, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

  48. Piston, W. (1987). Harmony (revised and expanded by M. DeVoto). New York: Norton.

  49. Schmuckler, M. A. (1989). Expectation in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic processes. Music Perception, 7, 109–150.

  50. Schmuckler, M. A. (1990). The performance of global expectations. Psychomusicology, 9, 122–147.

  51. Thompson, W. F., & Mor S. (1992). A perceptual investigation of polytonality. Psychological Research, 54, 60–71.

  52. Underwood, B. J. (1983). Attributes of memory. Glenview, Il.: Scott Foresman.

  53. Youngblood, J. E. (1958). Style as information. Journal of Music Theory, 2, 24–35.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to N. Oram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oram, N., Cuddy, L.L. & Oram, N. Responsiveness of Western adults to pitch-distributional information in melodic sequences. Psychol. Res 57, 103–118 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00447080

Download citation

Keywords

  • Relative Frequency
  • Temporal Location
  • Temporal Order
  • Probe Tone
  • Tonal Music