A comparison between Northern and Southern Hemisphere tundras and related ecosystems
- 105 Downloads
- 23 Citations
Summary
Climatic, edaphic, and vegetation parameters are compared among three Subantarctic islands and one Maritime Antarctic island, and Northern Hemisphere tundras and tundra-like ecosystems (ranging from higharctic to cool-temperate oceanic and temperate alpine), mainly by Principal Component Analyses (PCA). All analyses of abiotic variables emphasized the extreme oceanicity of the Southern Hemisphere sites and showed the strong influence of seaspray on soil nutrient ratios in the southern sites. Analyses of climate classified all the southern sites as “Cold Oceanic” within a series of very oceanic climates that were distinct from the continental/subalpine climates more typical of the northern sites. Four factorial groups were derived from the vectors in PCA of soils and climate combined. Each was a grouping of several variables that was essentially independent of the other groups. They were: general climatic severity, soil base status, supply of “labile” nutrients, and a combined index of oceanicity with organic/mineral balance and drainage. The ecological significance of these is discussed. The range of soil nutrient levels in the southern sites is approximately equal to that of the northern sites; however, in the southern sites soil nutrient levels are inversely related to climatic severity while in the north the reverse is true. The two most important causes of these opposed trends are the relative ages of the sites and the much greater effects of sea-based vertebrates (e.g. seals and seabirds) in the southern islands. Cluster analyses of component scores derived from climatic and soil data linked the southern sites with northern sites at higher latitudes, indicating the effect of the Antarctic continent on the Southern Ocean (hence on the overall climate of the southern islands) and of wind-chill on the aerial and soil climates of the southern sites. Vegetation patterns (derived from PCA of life form data) were more complex because of the serial replacement of one lifeform by onother along continuous environmental gradients. Wind exposure was an important element in the first two vectors derived from the PCA of the botanical data. The Southern Hemisphere sites exhibited almost the full range of vegetation types found in the Northern Hemisphere, despite their floristic poverty. Variation within individual islands was comparable with that found at considerably higher (up to 30° more) northern latitudes and reflects the overriding importance of wind exposure in the southern islands. Subarctic ecosystems are generally less severe forms of Arctic ones, and decreasing latitude leads to increasingly milder environments with no great changes overall in continentality. In contrast, the Subantarctic combines elements from the extremes of the range of northen tundras (i.e. high-Arctic and cool-temperate oceanic) with its own peculiar features (e.g. animal influences) to produce ecosystems that are qualitatively different both from Subarctic systems and from the continental Antarctic regions to which they are geographically closest.
Keywords
Principal Component Analysis Northern Site Southern Site Climatic Severity Wind ExposurePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Aleksandrova VD (1980) The Arctic and Antarctic: their division into geobotanical areas (English translation by D Löve). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Anderson JH, MacLean SF Jr, Weeden R (1981) Eagle Summit, Alaska, USA. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 779–780Google Scholar
- Barry RG, Courtin CM, Labine C (1981) Tundra climates. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 81–114Google Scholar
- Beals EW (1973) Ordination: mathematical elegance and ecological naiveté. J Ecol 61:23–36Google Scholar
- Bliss LC (1975) Devon Island, Canada. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:17–60Google Scholar
- Bliss LC (1979) Vascular plant vegetation of the southern circumpolar region in relation to Antarctic, alpine and Arctic vegetation. Can J Bot 57:2167–2178Google Scholar
- Bliss LC (1981a) Tundra biome: past and present: summary. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 38–46Google Scholar
- Bliss LC (1981b) North American and Scandinavian tundras and polar deserts. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 8–24Google Scholar
- Bunnel FL, MacLean SF Jr, Brown J (1975) Barrow, Alaska, USA. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:73–124Google Scholar
- Callaghan TV (1981) Disko Island, west Greenland. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 782–784Google Scholar
- Chernov YI, Dorogostaiskaya EV, Gerasimenko TV, Ignatenko IV, Matveyeva NV, Parinkina OM, Polozova TG, Romanova EN, Schamurin VF, Smirnova NV, Stepanova IV, Tomilin BA, Vinokurov AA, Zelensky OV (1975) Tareya, USSR. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:159–182Google Scholar
- Collins NG, Baker JH, Tibrook PJ (1975) Signy Island, Maritime Antarctic. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:345–374Google Scholar
- Deacon GER (1960) The southern cold temperate zone. In: Pantin CFA (1 dr) A discussion on the biology of the cold temperate zone. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 152:441–447Google Scholar
- Dowding P, Chapin FS III, Weilgolaski FE, Kilfeather P (1981) Nutrients in tundra ecosystems. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 647–684Google Scholar
- French DD (1974) Classification of IBP Tundra Biome sites based on climate and soil properties. In: Holding AJ, Heal OW, MacLean SF, Flanagan PW (eds) Soil organisms and decomposition in tundra. Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Stockholm, pp 3–25Google Scholar
- French DD (1981) Multivariate comparisons of IBP Tundra Biome site characteristics. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 47–75Google Scholar
- Gremmen NJM (1981) The vegetation of the Subantarctic islands Marion and Prince Edward. Geobotany 3. W Junk, The Hague, 149 ppGoogle Scholar
- Heal OW (1981) Introduction. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp xxvii–xxxviiGoogle Scholar
- Heal OW, Flanagan PW, French DD, MacLean SF Jr (1981) Decomposition and accumulation of organic matter in tundra. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 587–633Google Scholar
- Heal OW, Jones HE, Whittaker JB (1975) Moor House, UK. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems, Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:295–320Google Scholar
- Holdgate MW (1977) Terrestrial ecosystems in the Antarctic. In: Fuchs V, Laws RM (eds) Scientific research in Antarctica. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser B 279:5–25Google Scholar
- Huntley BJ (1971) Vegetation. In: Van Zinderen Bakker EM, Winterbottom JM, Dyer RA (eds) Marion and Prince Edward Islands. AA Balema, Cape Town, pp 98–160Google Scholar
- Huntley BJ (1972) Aerial standing crop of Marion Island plant communities. J S Afr Bot 38:115–119Google Scholar
- Jenkin JF (1975) Macquarie Island, sub-Antarctic. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:375–397Google Scholar
- Jenkin JF, Ashton J (1970) Productivity studies on Macquarie Island vegetation. In: Holdgate MW (ed) Antarctic ecology, vol I. Academic Press, London, pp 851–863Google Scholar
- Kallio P (1975) Kevo, Finland. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:193–224Google Scholar
- Larcher W, Cernusca A, Schmidt L, Grabherr G, Notzel E, Smeets N (1975) Mt. Patscherkofel, Austria. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:125–139Google Scholar
- Lewis Smith RI (1984) Terrestrial plant biology of the sub-Antarctic and Antarctic. In: Laws RM (ed) Antarctic ecology, vol 1. Academic Press, London, pp 61–162Google Scholar
- Lewis Smith RI, Walton DWH (1975) South Georgia, Subantarctic. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:399–423Google Scholar
- Löffler E (1983) Macquarie Island—eine vom Wind geprägte Naturlandschaft in der Subantarktis. Polarforschung 53:59–74Google Scholar
- Moore JJ, Dowding P, Healy B (1975) Glenamoy, Ireland. In: Rosswwall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:321–343Google Scholar
- Moser W (1971) Microclimate and photosynthesis in the Nival zone of the Alps. In: Heal OW (ed) IBP Tundra Biome, working meeting of analyses of ecosystems, Kevo, Finland. Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Stockholm, pp 22–33Google Scholar
- Mue M, Bliss LC (1977) Plant communities of Truelove Lowland. In: Bliss LC (ed) Truelove Lowland, Devon Island, Canada: a high Aretic ecosystem. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, pp 143–154Google Scholar
- Orloci L (1966) Geometric models in ecology, vol I. The theory and application of some ordination methods. J Ecol 54:193–215Google Scholar
- Østbye E, Berg A, Blehr O, Espeland M, Gaare E, Hagen A, Hesjedal O, Hagvar S, Kjelvik S, Lien L, Mysterud I, Sandhaug A, Skar H-J, Skartveit A, Skre O, Skogland T, Solhoy T, Stenseth NC, Wielgolaski FE (1975) Hardangervidda, Norway. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:225–264Google Scholar
- Rosswall T, Flower-Ellis JGK, Johansson LG, Jonsson S, Rydén BE, Sonesson M (1975) Stordalen (Abisko), Sweden. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:265–294Google Scholar
- Rosswall T, Heal OW (1975) Introduction. In: Rosswall T, Heal OW (eds) Structure and function of tundra ecosystems. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 20:7–16Google Scholar
- Rudmose Brown RN (1928) Antarctic and subantarctic plant life and some of its problems. Am Geog Soc Special Publ 7:343–352Google Scholar
- Rydén BE (1979) High latitude hydrology: on processes and water budgets of tundra regions. Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis 527, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
- Rydén BE (1981) Hydrology of northern tundras. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 115–138Google Scholar
- Smith VR (1978a) Animal-plant-soil nutrient relationships on Marion Island (Subantarctic). Oecologia (Berlin) 32:239–253Google Scholar
- Smith VR (1978b) Standing crop and production estimates of selected Marion Island plant communities. S Afr J Antarct Res 8:103–105Google Scholar
- Stonehouse B (1982) La zonation écologique sous les hautes latitudes australes. Com Nat Franc Recherch Antarct 51:531–537Google Scholar
- Tikhomiroy BA (ed) (1971) Biogeocoenoses of Taimyr Tundra and their productivity, vol 1 (Russian with English summaries). Nauka, Leningrad, 240 ppGoogle Scholar
- Tikhomirov BA (ed) (1973) Biogeocoenoses of Taimyr Tundra and their productivity, vol 2 (Russian with English summaries). Nauka, Leningrad, 208 ppGoogle Scholar
- Wace NM (1960) The botany of the southern oceanic islands. In: Pantin CFA (1 dr) A discussion on the biology of the cold temperate zone. Proc R Soc London, Ser B 152:475–490Google Scholar
- Warming E (1909) Oecology of plants. An introduction to the study of plant communities. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Webber PJ (1981) Niwot Ridge, Colorado, USA. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 780–782Google Scholar
- Wielgolaski FE (1972a) Vegetation types and plant biomass in tundra. Arct Alp Res 4:219–305Google Scholar
- Wielgolaski FE (1972b) Vegetation types and primary production in tundra. In: Wielgolaski FE, Rosswall T (eds) Tundra biome. Proc 4th Int Meeting Biol Prod Tundra. Tundra Biome Steering Committee, Stockholm, pp 9–34Google Scholar