Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Superficial mycoses observed at the Department of Dermatology of the University of Pavia

A 13-year survey

  • 31 Accesses

  • 17 Citations

Abstract

Over a period of 13 years, 4100 specimens were cultured for fungi. Pityriasis versicolor (Malassezia furfur) was demonstrated in 17.6%, dermatophytosis in 34.6% and candidiasis in 10.8%. The most frequently isolated strains were M. canis (31.5%), T. rubrum (26.3%), E. floccosum (19.7%), T. mentagrophytes (19.3%) for the dermatophytes and C. albicans (88.9%). Those rarely seen were: M. gypseum, T. violaceum, M. audouini, T. schoenleinii. We observed the absolutely complementary results of the microscopic examinations and the cultures of the specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Abbreviations

D:

Direct microscopic observation of the specimen

C:

Culture of the specimen

*:

Position of the table

References

  1. 1.

    Alteras I, Cafri B, Feuerman EJ. The high incidence of tinea pedis and unguium in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma. Mycopathologia 1981; 74:177–79.

  2. 2.

    Binazzi M, Papini M, Simonetti S. Skin mycoses geographic distribution and present-day pathomorphosis. Int J Dermat 1983; 22:92–97.

  3. 3.

    Borelli D. Medios caseros para micologia. Arch Venez Med Trop y Parass 1962; 4:301–10.

  4. 4.

    Caretta G, Dal Frate F, Picco AM, Mangiarotti AM. Superficial mycoses in Italy. Mycopathologia 1981; 76:27–32.

  5. 5.

    Cohen MM. Simple procedure for staining tinea versicolor (M. furfur) with fountain pen ink. J Inv Dermat 1954; 22:9–10.

  6. 6.

    De Assis L, De Aguiar EJ, Da Costa Nery JA, De Almeida A, Guimares AY, Azulay RD. Dados e coméntarios sobre 4060 exames micologicos realízados em ascamas de pele, pélos e unhas. Med Cut ILA 1985; 13:209–18.

  7. 7.

    Di Silverio A, Mosca M, Gatti M. Remarks on dermatomycoses observed at the Dermatology Department of Pavia: infection caused by M. canis. Giorn It Derm Vener 1987; 122:101–4.

  8. 8.

    Emtestam L, Kaaman T. The changing clinical picture of M. canis infections in Sweden. Acta Dermat Vener 1982; 62:539–41.

  9. 9.

    Lasagni A, Alessi E. Statistical considerations on mycological infections observed from 1964 to 1968 in Dermatology Department of Milano. Giorn It Derm Vener 1968; 109:331–35.

  10. 10.

    Mantovani A. Dermatophytozoonosis transmitted by pet. boll AIVPA 1973; 12:55–64.

  11. 11.

    Mantovani A, Ajello L, Nazzaro P. Epidemiology of mycoses. Giorn It Mal Inf Parass 1975; 27:685–91.

  12. 12.

    Papini M, Simonettis. Etiology and pathomorphosis of cutaneous mycoses in survey of the Dermatology Department of Perugia. Ann It Dermat Clin Sper 1982; 36:239–47.

  13. 13.

    Sinski JT, Flouras K. A survey of dermatophytes isolated from human patients in the United States from 1979 to 1981 with chronological listing of worldwide incidence of five dermatophytes often isolated in the United States. Mycopathologia 1984; 85:97–120.

  14. 14.

    Torres-Rodriguez JM, Balaguar-Meler J, Ventin-Hernandez M, Martin-Casabona N. Multicenter study of dermatophyte distribution in the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Mycopathologia 1986; 93:95–97.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to A. Di Silverio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Silverio, A., Mosca, M., Gatti, M. et al. Superficial mycoses observed at the Department of Dermatology of the University of Pavia. Mycopathologia 105, 11–17 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00443824

Download citation

Key words

  • superficial mycoses
  • dermatophytosis
  • candidiasis