Psychopharmacology

, Volume 98, Issue 1, pp 61–67 | Cite as

Differential mechanisms in the acquisition and expression of heroin-induced place preference

  • Timothy H. Hand
  • Luis Stinus
  • Michel Le Moal
Original Investigations

Abstract

These experiments examined the neurochemical mechanisms involved in the development and expression of place conditioning produced by heroin. Conditioned place preferences (CPP) lasting up to 8 weeks were obtained with doses of 50–1000 μg/kg heroin, using a regimen shown not to produce physical dependence. Naloxone pretreatment (50 μg/kg) during conditioning prevented the acquisition of heroin-induced CPP, but when given only on the test day, naloxone (50 or 1000 μg/kg) did not prevent the expression of heroin CPP. Clonidine disrupted the establishment of heroin CPP at 20 μg/kg, but disrupted its expression only at debilitating doses (100 and 200 μg/kg). Pimozide attenuated the acquisition (100 μ/kg) and expression (250 μg/kg) of heroin CPP. Together, these results support a role for opioid and catecholamine systems in the acquisition of heroin reinforcement, but they suggest that once heroin CPP is established, its expression in opiate-free subjects is not opiate receptor mediated and is relatively refractory to pharmacological treatments which disrupt acquisition. The data challenge the notion that the conditioned effects of opiates in drug-free animals are related to the release of endogenous opioids, and they also may help to explain why naloxone and clonidine are ineffective in the treatment of opiate addiction.

Key words

Rat Place preference Extinction Conditioning Naloxone Heroin Clonidine Pimozide Memory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghajanian GK, Vandermaelen CP (1982) Alpha-2 adrenoreceptor-mediated hyperpolarization of locus coeruleus neurons: intracellular studies in vivo. Science 215:1394–1396Google Scholar
  2. beninger RJ, Hahn BL (1983) Pimozide blocks establishement but not expression of amphetamine-produced environment-specific conditioning. Science 220:1304–1306Google Scholar
  3. Bloom FE, Segal D, Ling N, Guillemin R (1976) Endorphins: profound behavioral effects in rats suggest new etiological factors in mental illness. Science 194:630–632Google Scholar
  4. Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1981) Heroin reward is dependent on a dopaminergic substrate. Life Sci 29:1881–1886Google Scholar
  5. Bozarth MA, Wise RA (1984) Anatomically distinct opiate receptor fields mediate reward and physical dependence. Science 224:516–517Google Scholar
  6. Brown ZW, Amit Z, Smyor D, Rockman GE, Ogren SO (1978) Suppression of voluntary ingestion of morphine by inhibition of dopamine-beta-hydroxylase. Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 232:102–110Google Scholar
  7. Carmody JJ, Carrol PR, Morgans D (1979) Naloxone increases pain perception in rats and mice. Life Sci 24:1149–1152Google Scholar
  8. Cedarbaum JM, Aghajanian GK (1977) Catecholamine receptors on locus coeruleus neurons: pharmacological characterization. Eur J Pharmacol 44:375–385Google Scholar
  9. Charney DS, Riordan CE, Kleber HD, Murburg M, Braverman P, Sternberg DE, Heninger GR, Redmond DE (1982) Clonidine and naltrexone: a safe, effective and rapid treatment of abrupt withdrawal from methadone therapy. Arch Gen Psychiatry 39:1327–1333Google Scholar
  10. Davis WM, Smith SG (1977) Catecholaminergic mechanisms of reinforcement: direct assessment by drug self-administration. Life Sci 20:483–492Google Scholar
  11. Davis WM, Smith SG, Khalsa JH (1975) Noradrenergic role in the self-administration of morphine and amphetamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 3:477–484Google Scholar
  12. Drawbaugh R, Lal H (1974) Reversal by narcotic antagonist of a narcotic action elicited by a conditional stimulus. Nature 247:65–67Google Scholar
  13. Duggan AW, North RA (1984) Electrophysiology of opioids. Pharmacol Rev 35:219–281Google Scholar
  14. Eikelboom R, Stewart J (1979) Conditioned temperature effects using morphine as the unconditioned stimulus. Psychopharmacology 61:31–38Google Scholar
  15. Ettenberg A, Pettit HO, Bloom FE, Koob GF (1982) Heroin and cocaine intravenous self administration in rats: mediation by separate neural systems. Psychopharmacology 78:204–209Google Scholar
  16. Falk JL (1983) Drug dependence: myth or motive? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 19:385–391Google Scholar
  17. Franklin KBJ (1978) Catecholamines and self-stimulation: reward and performance effects dissociated. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 9:813–820Google Scholar
  18. Gallistel CR, Freyd G (1987) Quantitative determination of the effects of catecholaminergic agonists and antagonists on the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 26:731–741Google Scholar
  19. Gold MS, Redmond DE Jr, Kleber HD (1978) Clonidine blocks acute withdrawal symptoms. Lancet II:599–602Google Scholar
  20. Hand TH, Franklin KBJ (1985) 6-OHDA lesions of the ventral tegmental area block morphine-induced but not amphetamine-induced facilitation of self-stimulation. Brain Res 328:233–241Google Scholar
  21. Hand TH, Franklin KBJ (1986) Associative factors in the effects of morphine on self-stimulation. Psychopharmacology 88:472–479Google Scholar
  22. Hand TH, Koob GF, Stinus L, Le Moal M (1988) Aversive properties of opiate receptor blockade: evidence for exclusively central mediation in both naive and morphine-dependent rats. Brain Res 474:364–368Google Scholar
  23. Jaffe JH (1985) Drug addiction and drug abuse. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Wall TW, Murad F (eds) Goodman & Gilman's The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. McMillan, New York, pp 532–581Google Scholar
  24. Katz JL (1986) Effects of clonidine and morphine on opioid with-drawal in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 88:392–397Google Scholar
  25. Lal H, Miksic S, Smith N (1976) Naloxone antagonism of conditioned hyperthermia: an evidence for release of endogenous opioid. Life Sci 18:971–976Google Scholar
  26. Lynch JJ, Stein EA, Fertziger AP (1976) An analysis of 70 years of morphine classical conditioning: implications for clinical treatment of narcotic addiction. J Nerv Ment Dis 163:47–58Google Scholar
  27. Mackey WB, van der Kooy D (1985) Neuroleptics block the positive reinforcing effects of amphetamine but not of morphine as measured by place conditioning. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22:101–105Google Scholar
  28. Magnan J, Paterson SJ, Tavani A, Kosterlitz HW (1982) The binding spectrum of narcotic analgesic drugs with different agonist and antagonist properties. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 319:197–205Google Scholar
  29. Martin WR (1967) Opioid antagonists. Pharmacol Rev 19:463–521Google Scholar
  30. Martin WR (1984) Pharmacology of opioids. Pharmacol Rev 35:283–323Google Scholar
  31. McGilliard KL, Takemori AE (1978) Alterations in the antagonism by naloxone of morphine-induced respiratory depression and analgesia after morphine pretreatment. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 207:884–891Google Scholar
  32. Mucha RF, Iversen SD (1984) Reinforcing properties of morphine and naloxone revealed by conditioned place preferences: a procedural examination. Psychopharmacology 82:241–247Google Scholar
  33. Mucha RF, van der Kooy D, O'Shaughnessy M, Bucenieks P (1982) Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in the rat. Brain Res 243:91–105Google Scholar
  34. Neiswander JL, Bardo MT (1987) Expression of morphine-conditioned hyperactivity is attenuated by naloxone and pimozide. Psychopharmacology 93:314–319Google Scholar
  35. O'Brien CP, Ehrman RN, Ternes JW (1986) Classical conditioning in human opioid dependence. In: Goldberg SR, Stolerman IP (eds) Behavioral analysis of drug dependence. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. Pavlov IP (1927) Conditioned reflexes. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Pettit HO, Ettenberg A, Bloom FE, Koob GF (1984) Destruction of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens selectively attenuates cocaine but not heroin self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 84:167–173Google Scholar
  38. Picker M, Heise JW, Dykstra LA (1987) Evaluation of the effects of opioid agonists and antagonists under a fixed-consecutive-numbers schedule in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:73–80Google Scholar
  39. Pinder RM, Brogden RN, Sawyer PR, Speight TM, Spencer R, Avery GS (1976) Pimozide: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic uses in psychiatry. Drugs 12:1–40Google Scholar
  40. Poncelet M, Dangoumau L, Soubrié P, Simon P (1987) Effects of neuroleptic drugs, clonidine and lithium on the expression of conditioned behavioral excitation in rats. Psychopharmacology 92:393–397Google Scholar
  41. Robertson A, Laferrière A, Milner PM (1982) Treatment with anticonvulsant drugs retards the development of brain-stimulation reward in the prefrontal cortex. Physiol Behav 29:275–280Google Scholar
  42. Robson LE, Paterson SJ, Kosterlitz HW (1983) Opiate receptors. In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Rudd P, Blaschke TF (1985) Antihypertensive agents and the drug therapy of hypertension. In: Gilman AG, Goodman LS, Rall TW, Murad E (eds) The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. Macmillan, New York, pp 784–805Google Scholar
  44. Schuster CR (1986) Implications of laboratory research for the treatment of drug dependence. In: Goldberg SR, Stolerman IP (eds) Behavioral analysis of drug dependence. Academic Press, London, pp 357–385Google Scholar
  45. Shannon HE, Holtzman SJ (1976) Evaluation of the discriminative effects of morphine in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 198:54–65Google Scholar
  46. Shippenberg TS, Herz A (1987) Place preference conditioning reveals the involvement of D1-dopamine receptors in the motivational properties of μ and κ-opioid agonists. Brain Res 436:169–172Google Scholar
  47. Snodgrass SH, Allen JD (1988) The effects of apomorphine on the acquisition of schedule-induced polydipsia in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 29:483–488Google Scholar
  48. Spyraki C, Fibiger H, Phillips AG (1983) Attenuation of heroin reward in rats by disruption of the mesolimbic dopamine system. Psychopharmacology 79:278–283Google Scholar
  49. Stewart J, Vezina P (1988) Extinction training demonstrates that different mechanisms underlie the stimulus control of the expression of environment-specific behavioral sensitization produced by morphine or amphetamine. Soc Neurosci Abstr 14:221Google Scholar
  50. Stewart J, de Wit H, Eikelboom R (1984) Role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychol Rev 91:251–268Google Scholar
  51. Svensson TH, Bunney BS, Aghajanian GK (1975) Inhibition of both noradrenergic and serotoninergic neurons in brain by the alpha adrenergic agonist clonidine. Brain Res 92:291–306Google Scholar
  52. Swerdlow NR, Gilbert D, Koob GF (1988) Conditioned drug effects on spatial preference: critical evaluation. In: Boulton AA, Baker GB, Greenshaw AJ (eds) Neuromethods, vol 13Google Scholar
  53. Woolverton WL, Wessinger WD, Balster RL (1982) Reinforcing properties of clonidine in rhesus monkeys. Psychopharmacology 77:17–23Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy H. Hand
    • 1
  • Luis Stinus
    • 1
  • Michel Le Moal
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychobiologie des Comportements INSERM U-259BordeauxFrance

Personalised recommendations