Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 113, Issue 3, pp 134–137 | Cite as

Primary femoral shortening osteosynthesis in the management of comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures

  • G. Blatter
  • H. König
  • M. Janssen
  • F. Magerl
Original Article

Abstract

Supracondylar fractures are most often the result of high-energy vehicular trauma in the young population, and the result of low-energy injuries in the elderly. Therefore, these fractures are generally associated with comminution or osteoporosis. Anatomic reconstruction with stable medial buttressing is often not possible. Utilization of AO principles and techniques with anatomic reduction and internal fixation often fails to yield sufficient stability. We have developed a technique for the treatment of these distal femoral fractures which involves shortening by impaction. Rather than achieving anatomic reduction, the femur is shortened by telescoping the fragments to reestablish inherent stability of the bone prior to internal fixation. Over a 20-year period we treated 25 commnnuted supracondylar femoral fractures with primary shortening osteosynthesis in 24 patients. Sixteen patients were available for review at an average follow-up of 10 years (range 4–24 years). Ninety-four percent of the patients demonstrated complete radiographic consolidation by 14 weeks after the operative intervention. One patient required secondary bone grafting and reached consolidation at 30 weeks. Primary cancellous grafting was utilized in only 25% of the patients. One-third of the patients in review were given a heel lift; the average shortening in these patients was 2.6 cm (range 2.1–5 cm). Two-thirds of the patients did not require a heel lift, the average shortening in this group of patients being 1.2 cm (range 0.8–2.0 cm). At follow-up the average range of motion of the knee was 114° (range 90°–130°). All patients had full extension and an average loss of flexion compared to the contralateral knee of 16°. The functional results of these patients at follow-up were analyzed according to criteria established by Neer. A functional evaluation and radiographs were obtained in all these patients at follow-up and showed an excellent result in 44%, a good result in 38%, and a satisfactory result in 18%. Primary shortening osteosynthesis is a very predictable method of managing comminuted supracondylar fractures of the femur with good results.

Keywords

Osteoporosis Internal Fixation Femoral Fracture Anatomic Reduction Contralateral Knee 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Borgen D, Sprangue BL (1975) Treatment of distal femoral fractures with early weight-bearing. Clin Orthop 3:156–162Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiron HS, Tremoulet J, Casey P, Muller M (1974) Fractures of the distal third of the femur treated by internal fixation. Clin Orthop 100:160–170Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connolly JF (1980) Torsional fractures and the third dimension of fracture management. South Med J 73:884–888Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Connolly JF (1981) The management of fractures and dislocations, an atlas. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giles JB, DeLee JC, Heckmann JD, Keever JE (1982) Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64A:864–870Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loomer RL, Meek R, DeSommer F (1980) Plating of femoral shaft fractures: the Vancouver experience. J Trauma 20:1038–1042Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mähring M, Szyszkowitz R (1981) Zur Bedeutung einer Klassifikation distaler Femurfrakturen anhand der Langzeitergebnisse 31 operativ behandelter supra-diacondyldrer Oberschenkelfrakturen. Unfallchirurgie 7:25–32Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matinek H, Schmid L (1978) Frakturen des distalen Oberschenkels und ihre Behandlung mit der Condylenplatte. Chirurg 49:382–389Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mize RD, Bucholz RW, Grogan DP (1982) Surgical treatment of displaced, comminuted fractures of the distal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64-A:871–879Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Müller ME (1980) Klassifikation und internationale AO-Dokumentation der Femurfrakturen. Unfallheilkunde 83:251–260Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Neer CS II, Grantham SA, Shelton ML (1967) Supracondylar fracture of the adult femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 49-A:591–613Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roberts JB (1977) Management of fractures and fracture complications of the femoral shaft using the ASIF compression plate. J Trauma 17:20–26Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanders R, Regazzoni P, Rüedi TP (1989) Treatment of supracondylar-intracondylar fractures of the femur using the dynamic condylar screw. J Orthop Trauma 3:214–222Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schatzker J, Lambert DC (1979) Supracondylar fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop 138:77–83Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schatzker J, Home G, Waddell J (1974) The Toronto experience with the supracondylar fracture of the femur 1966–72. Injury 6:113–118Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siliski JM, Mähring M, Hofer HP (1989) Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 71-A:95–99Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stewart MJ, Sisk TD, Wallace SL Jr (1966) Fractures of the distal third of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 48-AGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trentz O, Tscherne H, Oestern HJ (1977) Operationstechnik und Ergebnisse bei distalen Femurfrakturen. Unfallheilkunde 80:441–446Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Blatter
    • 1
  • H. König
    • 1
  • M. Janssen
    • 2
  • F. Magerl
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryKantonsspitalSt. GallenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Lakewood Orthopedic ClinicLakewoodUSA

Personalised recommendations