Psychopharmacologia

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 111–116 | Cite as

Possible anticholinesterase-like effects of trans(−)δ8 and -δ9tetrahydrocannabinol as observed in the general motor activity of mice

  • Hugh Brown
Animal Studies

Abstract

The general motor activity of mice, measured by photobeam interruption, was depressed following dosage with trans(−)δ8 and -δ9tetrahydrocannabinol. The effect was similar to that obtained with synhexyl, pentobarbital, and eserine, but directly opposite to the stimulatory effect obtained with Ditran and scopolamine. The depressant effect of the tetrahydrocannabinols, synhexyl and eserine was potentiated by tacrine while the stimulant effect of Ditran and scopolamine was antagonized. Pentobarbital did not reveal any interaction with tacrine. Thus, the tetrahydrocannabinols appeared to possibly have an anticholinesterase sedative-like action. The compatibility of the finding with earlier reports suggesting anticholinergic-like actions of tetrahydrocannabinols and the drug-behavior interaction implications are discussed.

Key words

Anticholinergic Sedative Anticholinesterase Tetrahydrocannabinols General Motor Activity Mice Drug-Behavior Interaction Antagonism Synergism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Becker, H. S.: Marijuana use and the social context. Soc. Probs. 3, 33–44 (1955).Google Scholar
  2. Bell, C., Gershon, S.: Experimental anticholinergic psychotomimetics: Antagonism of yohimbine and tacrine (THA). Med. exp. (Basel) 10, 15–21 (1964).Google Scholar
  3. Brown, H.: Some anticholinergic-like behavioural effects of trans(−)δ 8 tetrahydrocannabinol. Psychopharmacologia (Berl.) 21, 294–301 (1971).Google Scholar
  4. Brown, H.: The role of acetylcholine in behaviour suppressing mechanisms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, H.: Behavioral studies of animal vision and drug action. In: C. C. Pfeiffer and J. R. Smythies (Eds.): International Review of Neurobiology, Vol. 10. New York: Academic Press 1967.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, H.: Drug-behavior interaction effecting development of tolerance to d-amphetamine as observed in fixed ratio behavior of rats. Psychol. Rep. 16, 917–921 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. Brown, H., Richards, R. K.: An interaction between drug effects and food reinforced “social” behavior in pigeons. Arch. int. Pharmacodyn. 164, 286–293 (1966).Google Scholar
  8. Carlton, P. L.: Cholinergic mechanisms in the control of behavior by the brain. Psychol. Rev. 70, 19–39 (1963).Google Scholar
  9. Davis, G. D.: Effects of central excitant and depressant drugs on locomotor activity in the monkey. Amer. J. Physiol. 88, 619–623 (1957).Google Scholar
  10. Dews, P. B.: The measurement of the influence of drugs on voluntary ativity in mice. Brit. J. Pharmacol. 8, 46–48 (1953).Google Scholar
  11. Everett, G. M.: Some electrophysiological and biochemical correlates of motor activity and aggressive behavior. In: E. Rothlin (Ed.): Amsterdam: Elsevier 1961.Google Scholar
  12. Forbes, W. B., Olivetti, C. C., Kilby, M. M.: Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol inhibition of deprivation and carbachol induced water consumption in the rat. Paper read at Southwestern Psychological Association Meeting, San Antonio, April 1971.Google Scholar
  13. Hollister, L. E., Richards, R. K., Gillespie, H. K.: Comparison of tetrahydrocannabinol and synhexyl in man. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 9, 783–791 (1968).Google Scholar
  14. Issac, W., Root, T. C.: Evaluation of four activity techniques for monkeys. Science 123, 1170 (1956).Google Scholar
  15. Joyce, C. R. B., Curry, S. H. (Eds.): The botany and chemistry of cannabis. London: Churchill 1970.Google Scholar
  16. Keeler, M. H.: Adverse reaction to marijuana. In: Drug abuse, social and psychopharmacological aspects, J. O. Cole and J. R. Wittenborn (Eds.). Springfield, Ill.: Ch. C. Thomas 1969.Google Scholar
  17. Kilby, M. M., Johnson, K., Fritchie, G. E.: The effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol on innate and instrumental fighting behavior in the mouse. Paper read at Southwestern Psychological Association Meeting, San Antonio, April 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Koelle, G. B.: Anticholinesterase agents. In: The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, L. S. Goodman and A. Gilman (Eds.), 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan 1965.Google Scholar
  19. Sidman, M.: Drug-behavior interaction. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 65, 282–302 (1956).Google Scholar
  20. Spence, J. T., Underwood, B. J., Duncan, C. P., Cotton, J. W.: Elementary statistics, 2nd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1968.Google Scholar
  21. Weil, A. T., Zinberg, N. E., Nelsen, J. M.: Clinical and psychological effects of marijuana in man. Science 162, 1234–1242 (1968).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Paul's CollegeWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Drug Abuse Training CenterUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations