Two different views of the internet are presented. One is from the perspective of an author who has written a personal account of her own breast cancer experience, while the other is from the perspective of a cancer researcher who is interested in quality of life research. The article is written in a format that reflects the somewhat informal style of messages sent to Internet discussion groups. For better or worse, the Internet has arrived as a force in our lives, and medical information and support constitute two of its more important uses. Both authors agree that the novel medium of the Internet provides a unique opportunity to create a true partnership of health care providers and consumers.
Key wordsCommunication Internet psychosocial support quality of life
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Oxford Encyclopedic English Dictionary, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991: 1050.Google Scholar
- 2.New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology. London: Hamlyn Publishing Group, 1959: 93.Google Scholar
- 3.Coiera E.. The Internet's challenge to health care provision. BMJ 1996; 312: 3–4.Google Scholar
- 4.Kassirer JP, Angell M. The Internet and the Journal. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 1709–1710.Google Scholar
- 5.Mayer M. Examining myself: one woman's story of breast cancer treatment and recovery. Boston: Faber & Faber, 1993.Google Scholar
- 6.Mayer M. The breast cancer listserv: a virtual community. List archives of Medinfo.org, http://cure.medinfo.org/lists/cancer/bc-about.html, 1996.Google Scholar
- 7.Till JE, McCulloch EA, Siminovitch L. A stochastic model of stem cell proliferation, based on the growth of spleen colony-forming cells. Proc Nat Acad Sci 1964; 51: 29–36.Google Scholar
- 8.Till JE. Quality of life measurements in cancer treatment. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds. Important Advances in Oncology 1992. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1992: 189–204.Google Scholar
- 9.Stoll C. Silicon snake oil: second thoughts on the information highway. New York: Doubleday, 1995.Google Scholar
- 10.Tukle S. Life on the screen: identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Shuster, 1995.Google Scholar
- 11.Negroponte N. Being digital. New York: Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar
- 12.Till JE. Discussion groups on the Internet: journaling. Can J Oncol 1995; 5: 379–380.Google Scholar
- 13.US National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects in Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1978.Google Scholar