Advertisement

Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery

, Volume 106, Issue 1, pp 12–14 | Cite as

A comparison of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation

  • P. Gillström
  • K. Ericsson
  • T. Hindmarsh
Original Articles

Summary

Ninety patients suspected to have a herniated lumbar disc were examined by myelography and computed tomography (CT). Of these, 37 were subjected to surgery. The surgical findings were in agreement in 21 patients (57%) with the myelograms and in 28 patients (76%) with the CT examinations. False-positive CT examinations were found in only one patient. CT is as reliable as myelography in the primary diagnosis of disc herniation.

Keywords

Public Health Compute Tomography Primary Diagnosis Disc Herniation Compute Tomography Examination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amundsen P, Helsingen P, Kristiansen K (1963) Evaluation of lumbar radioculography (myelography) with water-soluble contrast media. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 1:659–665Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benjamin V, Mangiardi JR, Lin J, Bann I (1982) The value of computed tomography versus conventional myelography in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of lumbar disc disease. 51st Annual Meeting of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Honolulu, Hawaii, AprilGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coin GC, Keranen V, Pennink M, Ahmad WD (1978) Computerized tomography of the spine and its contents. Neurol Radiol 16:271–272Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eldevik O, Dugstad G, Orrison WW, Haughton VM (1982) The effect of clinical bias on the interpretation of myelography and spinal computed tomography. Radiology 145:85–89Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fries JW, Abodeely D, Vijunco J, Yeager Y, Gaffey W (1982) Computed tomography of herniated and extruded nucleus pulposus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 6 (5):874–887Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glasauer FE, Alker G (1983) Metrizamide-enhanced computed tomography: An adjunct to myelography in the lumbar disc herniation. Comp Radiol 7 (5):305–310Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glenn WV, Rhodes ML, Altschuler EM, Wiltse LL, Kostanke C, Kuo YM (1979) A multiplanar display of computerized body tomography applications in the lumbar spine. Spine 4:282–294Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Griebel R, Tchang S, Khan M, Varughese G (1983) Correlation of computed tomography with surgical diagnosis and lumbar disc disease. Can J Neurol Sci 10:248–251Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    di Guglielmo O, Garbagna G, Cornalba G, Vadala G, Villa A, Ballarati P (1982) Vallore della tomografia computerizzata nella diagnosi de ernia del disco lombare. La Radiol Med 68:51–56Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammerschlag SB, Wolpert SM, Carter BL (1976) Computed tomography of the spinal canal. Radiology 121:361–367Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haughton WM, Eldevik O, Magnaes B, Amundsen F (1982) A prospective comparison of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated lumbar discs. Radiology 142:103–110Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hirofuji E, Tanaka S (1983) Computed tomography and lumbar disc herniation. Spine 8 (3)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hudgins WR (1970) The predictive value of myelography in the diagnosis of ruptured lumbar discs. J Neuro Surg 32:152–162Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee B, Kazam E, Newman AD (1978) Computed tomography of the spine and spinal canal cord. Radiology 128:95–102Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meyer GA, Haughton WM, Williams AL (1979) Diagnosis of herniated lumbar disc with computed tomography. N Engl J Med 301:1166–1167Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikhael MA (1983) High-resolution computed tomography in the diagnosis of laterally herniated lumbal discs. Comp Radiol 7 (3):161–166Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nazih A, Rusell WH, Weinstein MA (1983) Computed tomographic-myelographic and operative findings in patients with suspected herniated lumbar discs. Neuro Surg 12 (2)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    von D zur Nedden, Hammer B, Mohsenipour I (1983) Der Stellenwert von computertomographischen Untersuchungen beim lumbalen Diskusprolaps: Ein Vergleich zwischen CT-Geräten der 2. und 3. Generation. Roentgen Praxis 36:354–358Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Svensson RG, Hessel SJ, Herman PG (1977) Omissions in radiology: Faulty search or stringent reporting criteria? Radiology 123:563–567Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Gillström
    • 1
  • K. Ericsson
    • 2
  • T. Hindmarsh
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of NeuroradiologyKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyKarolinska HospitalStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations