Quality of Life Research

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 251–256 | Cite as

Does changing the heart mean changing personality? A retrospective inquiry on 47 heart transplant patients

  • B. Bunzel
  • B. Schmidl-Mohl
  • A. Grundböck
  • G. Wollenek
Research Papers

Abstract

Heart transplantation is not simply a question of replacing an organ that no longer functions. The heart is often seen as source of love, emotions, and focus of personality traits. To gain insight into the problem of whether transplant patients themselves feel a change in personality after having received a donor heart, 47 patients who were transplanted over a period of 2 years in Vienna, Austria, were asked for an interview. Three groups of patients could be identified: 79% stated that their personality had not changed at all postoperatively. In this group, patients showed masslve defense and denial reactions, mainly by rapidly changing the subject or making the question ridiculous. Fifteen per cent stated that their personality had indeed changed, but not because of the donor organ, but due to the life-threatening event. Six per cent (three patients) reported a distinct change of personality due to their new hearts. These incorporation fantasies forced them to change feelings and reactions and accept those of the donor. Verbatim statements of these heart transplant recipients show that there seem to be severe problems regarding graft incorporation, which are based on the age-old idea of the heart as a centre that houses feelings and forms the personality.

Key words

Body image changes of personality heart transplantation incorporation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    GaudianiVA, StinsonEB, AldermanE, et al. Long-term survival and function after cardiac trans-plantation. Ann Surg 1982; 194(4): 381–385.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    LoughME, LindsayAM, ShinnJA, StottsNA. Life satisfaction following heart transplantation. J Heart Transplant 1985; 4(4): 446–449.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ÓBrienBJ, BuxtonMJ, FergusonBA. Measuring the effectiveness of heart transplant programmes: Quality of life data and their relationship to survival analysis. J Chron Dis 1987; 1: 137–153.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    SamuelssonRG, HuntSA, SchroederJS. Functional and social rehabilitation of heart transplant recipients under age thirty. Scand J Cardiovasc Surg 1984; 18: 97–103.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    GriffithBP, HardesbyRL, ThompsonME. Cardiac transplantation with cyclosporine: The Pittsburgh experience. J Heart Transplant 1983; 2: 251–155.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    KriettJN, KayeMP. The Registry of the International society for the heart and lung transplantation: seventh official report — 1991. J Heart & Lung Transplant 1991; 18(4): 491–498.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    LauferG, MiholicJ, LaczkovicsA, et al. Independent risk factors predicting acute graft rejection in cardiac transplant recipients treated by triple drug immunosuppression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989; 98: 1113–1121.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    RauchJB, KneenKK. Accepting the gift of life: heart transplant recipients' post-operative adaptive tasks. Soc Work Health Care 1989; 14(1): 47–59.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ShapiroPA. Life after heart transplantation. Progr Cardiovasc Dis 1990; 32(6): 405–418.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MeserveHC. The matter of the heart. J Relig Health 1984; 23: 263–267.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NorvellN, ContiCR, HackerH. Heart transplantation candidates: Psychological evaluation. Prim Cardiol 1987; 13: 20–26.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castelnuovo-TedescoP. Ego vicissitudes in response to replacement of body parts. Psychoanal Quarterly 1978; 47: 381–397.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    KraftIA. Psychiatric complications of cardiac transplantation. Semin Psychiatry 1971; 3: 89–97.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    FriersonRL, LippmannSB. Heart transplant patients rejected on psychiatric indications. Psychosomatics 1987; 28(7): 347–355.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    TablerJB, FriersonRL. Sexual concerns after heart transplantation. J Heart & Lung Transplant 1990; 9(4): 7–493.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Das Neue Blatt. 1986, 51: 10.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quick. Transplantation: Für immer herzlich verbunden. Heft 22, May 1988: 100–101.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wiener Kurier. 18. Nov. 1989: 4.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Medawar Sir Peter; at the Second International Congress of the Transplantation Society, 1968, New York City. Reference: Firth BG. Southwestern International Medicine Conference: Replacement of the failing heart. Am J Med Sci 1987; 1: 50–65.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    KuhnWF, MyersB, BrennanAF, et al. Psychopathology in heart transplant candidates. J Heart Transplant 1988; 7: 223–226.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rodgers J. Life in the cutting edge. Psychology Today 1984. Oct.: 58-6.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McAleerMJ, CopelandJ, FullerJ, CopelandJG. Psychological aspects of heart transplantation. J Heart Transplant 1985; 4(2): 232–233.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    MaiFM. Graft and donor denial in heart transplant recipients. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143: 1159–1161.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    FreemanAM, SokolMA, FolksDG, McVayRF, McGriffinAF, FahsJJ. Psychiatric characteristics of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. Psychiatr Med 1988; 6(2): 8–22.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    ShapiroPA, KornfeldDS. Psychiatric outcome of heart transplantation. Gen Hosp Psychiatr 1989; 11: 352–357.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    HackettT, CassemN. Development of a quantitative rating scale to assess denial. J Psychosom Res 1974; 18: 93–100.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    HaanN. Coping and Defending — Processes of selfenvironment organization. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    CardinS, ClarkS. A nursing diagnosis approach to the patient awaiting cardiac transplantation. Heart Lung 1985; 14(5): 499–504.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    FahyTA. The diagnosis of Multiple Personality Disorder. A Clinical Review. Br J Psychiatry 1988; 153: 597–606.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rudiger H. Die Metapher vom Herzen in der Literatur. In: Thomae K, ed. Das Herz im Umkreis des Denkens. Biberach ar. der Riss 1985: 87–154.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Bunzel
    • 1
  • B. Schmidl-Mohl
    • 2
  • A. Grundböck
    • 1
  • G. Wollenek
    • 1
  1. 1.Second Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.University Hospital of PsychiatryViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations