Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

“Go here-go there” performance after amphetamine: The importance of the response requirement in successive discrimination

Abstract

Marmosets were trained on a task involving simultaneous and successive visual discrimination performance where responses were required on all trials. performance of this task was not affected by low doses of amphetamine. From this it is concluded that amphetamine does not cause a narrowing of attention and that the disruptive effect of amphetamine on the “go-no go” successive discrimination task already reported is due to a loss of response inhibition rather than to difficulties in the recognition of stimuli presented without a comparison stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Groves M, Rebec GV (1976) Biochemistry and behaviour: Some central actions of amphetamine and antipsychotic drugs. Annu Rev Psychol 27:91–127

  2. Heise GA, Lilie NL (1970) Effects of scopolamine, atropine and d-amphetamine on internal and external control of responding on non-reinforced trials. Psychopharmacologia 18:38–49

  3. Laties VG, Weiss B (1966) Inlluence of drugs on behaviour controlled by internal and external stimuli. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 152:388–396

  4. Lyon M, Robbins T (1975) The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: A general theory concerning amphetamine effects. Curr Dev Psychopharmacol 2:79–163

  5. McMillan DE, Morse WH (1967) Schedules using noxious stimuli. II. Low intensity electric shock as a discriminative stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav 10:109–118

  6. Randrup A, Munkvad I (1967) Stereotyped activities produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man. Psychopharmacologia 11:300–310

  7. Ridley RM, Baker HF, Weight ML (1980) Amphetamine disrupts successive but not simultaneous visual discrimination in the monkey. Psychopharmacology 67:241–244

  8. Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (1979) “Paradoxical” effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs in hyperactive children from the standpoint of behavioural pharmacology. Neuropharmacology 18:931–950

  9. Rylander G (1971) Stereotypy in man following amphetamine abuse. In: Baker SBC (ed) The correlation of adverse effects in man with observations in animals. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 28

  10. Scraggs PR, Ridley RM (1978) Behavioural effects of amphetamine in a small primate: Relative potencies of the d- and l-isomers. Psychopharmacology 59:243–245

  11. Weiss B, Laties VG (1962) Enhancement of human performance by caffeine and the amphetamines. Pharmacol Rev 14:1–36

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to R. M. Ridley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ridley, R.M., Weight, M.L., Haystead, T.A.J. et al. “Go here-go there” performance after amphetamine: The importance of the response requirement in successive discrimination. Psychopharmacology 69, 271–273 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00433094

Download citation

Key words

  • Amphetamine
  • “Go here-go there”
  • Marmoset