Marine Biology

, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 537–546 | Cite as

Clonal and solitary anemones (Anthopleura) of western North America: population genetics and systematics

  • B. L. Smith
  • D. C. Potts
Article

Abstract

Francis (1979) proposed that clonal and solitary forms of the anemone Anthopleura elegantissima are actually two species. In 1984 and 1985, samples from two to six California populations of all known forms and species of California Anthopleura were analyzed electrophoretically to determine their taxonomic relationships. Data from 14 enzymes and 18 loci, 17 of them polymorphic, show that the two forms of A. elegantissima are virtually identical electrophoretically, and there is no evidence of reduced gene flow between them. We conclude there are three species of Anthopleura in California: A. elegantissima (Brandt, 1835), A. xanthogrammica (Brandt, 1835) and A. artemisia (Dana, 1848). Genetic variation in the two species capable of asexual reproduction, A. elegantissima and A. artemisia, is extremely high, approximately 2.5 times that of the strictly sexual A. xanthogrammica.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Avise, J. C.: Systematic value of electrophoretic data. Syst. Zool. 23, 465–481 (1975)Google Scholar
  2. Ayala, F. J.: Enzymes as taxonomic characters. In Protein polymorphism: adaptative and taxonomic significance, pp 3–26. Ed. by G. S. Oxford and D. Rollinson. New York: Academic Press 1983Google Scholar
  3. Ayala, F. J., D. Hedgecock, G. S. Zumwalt and J. W. Valentine: Genetic variation in Tridacna maxima, an ecological analog of some unsuccessful evolutionary lineages. Evolution 27, 177–191 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Ayre, D. J.: The effects of sexual and asexual reproduction on geographic variation in the sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Oecologia 62, 222–229 (1984)Google Scholar
  5. Berger, P. J.: Population genetics of marine gastropods and bivalves. In: The Mollusca, Vol. 6, pp 563–596. Ed. by W. D. Russell-Hunter. New York: Academic Press 1983Google Scholar
  6. Berggren, W. A.: Roles of ocean gateways in climatic changes. In: Studies in geophysics, pp 118–125. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press 1982Google Scholar
  7. Brandt, J. F.: Prodromus descriptionis animalium ab H. Mertensio observatorum, Akademiia nauk, Leningrad, pp 201–275. Recueil des actes de la seance publique de l'academie impériale des sciences de St. Petersbourg 1835Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, G. J.: An introduction to isozyme techniques, 186 pp. New York: Academic Press 1970Google Scholar
  9. Bucklin, A. and D. Hedgecock: Biochemical genetic evidence for a third species of Metridium senile. Mar. Biol. 66, 1–7 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. Bucklin, A., D. Hedgecock and C. Hand: Genetic evidence of self-fertilization in the sea anemone Epiactis prolifera. Mar. Biol. 84, 175–182 (1984)Google Scholar
  11. Carlgren, O.: A survey of the Phytodactiaria, Corallimorpharia and Actiniaria. K. Sven. Vetenskapsakad. Handl. ser. 4, 1, 1–121 (1949)Google Scholar
  12. Carlgren, O.: The Actinian fauna of the Gulf of California. U.S. natl Mus. 101, 415–449 (1951)Google Scholar
  13. Cook, R. E.: Clonal plant populations. Am. Sci. 71, 244–253 (1983)Google Scholar
  14. Dana, J. D.: Zoophytes. United States exploring expedition during the years 1838–42, Vol. 7, with atlas. Philadelphia 1848Google Scholar
  15. Druffel, E. M.: Banded corals: changes in oceanic carbon-14 during the Little Ice Age. Science, Wash. D.C. 218, 13–19 (1982)Google Scholar
  16. Dunn, D. W.: Anthopleura handii n. sp. (Coelenterata, Actinaria) an internally brooding, intertidal sea anemone from Malaysia. Wasmann J. Biol. 35, 54–64 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. Ferguson, A.: Biochemical systematics and evolution, 170 pp. London: Blackie Press 1980Google Scholar
  18. Foltz, D. W.: Null alleles as a possible cause of heterozygote deficiencies in the oyster Crassostrea virginica and other bivalves. Evolution 40, 211–215 (1986)Google Scholar
  19. Ford, C. E.: Reproduction in the aggregating sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Pac. Sci. 18, 138–145 (1964)Google Scholar
  20. Francis, L.: Clone specific segregation in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 144, 64–72 (1973a)Google Scholar
  21. Francis, L.: Intraspecific aggression and its effects on the distribution of Anthopleura elegantissima and some related sea anemones. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 144, 73–92 (1973b)Google Scholar
  22. Francis, L.: Contrast between solitary and clonal lifestyles in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Am. Zool. 19, 669–681 (1979)Google Scholar
  23. Garton, D. W.: Relationship between multiple locus heterozygosity and physiological energetics of growth in the estuarine gastropod Thais haemastoma. Physiol. Zool. 57, 530–543 (1984)Google Scholar
  24. Hamrick, J. L.: Genetic variation and longevity. In: Topics in plant population biology, pp 84–107. Ed. by O. T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G. B. Johnson and P. H. Ravens. New York: Columbia University Press 1979Google Scholar
  25. Hamrick, J. L., Y. B. Linhart and J. B. Mitton: Relationships between life history characteristics and electrophoretically detectable genetic variation in plants. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10, 173–200 (1979)Google Scholar
  26. Hand, C.: The sea anemones of central California, Part II. Wasman J. Biol. 13, 37–99 (1955)Google Scholar
  27. Harris, H. and D. A. Hopkinson: Handbook of enzyme electrophoresis in human genetics, 259 pp. New York: American Elsevier 1976Google Scholar
  28. Hartl, D. L.: Principles of population genetics, 488 pp. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates 1980Google Scholar
  29. Hiebert, R. D.: The population biology of bristlecone pine in the eastern Great Basin. University of Kansas: Ph.D. dissertation 1977Google Scholar
  30. Hoffmann, R. J.: Variation in contributions of asexual reproduction to the genetic structure of populations of the sea anemone Metridium senile. Evolution 40, 357–365 (1986)Google Scholar
  31. Jennison, B. L.: Gametogenesis and reproductive cycles in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Can. J. Zool. 57, 403–411 (1979)Google Scholar
  32. Koehn, R. K. and P. M. Gaffney: Genetic heterozygosity and growth rate in Mytilus edulis. Mar. Biol. 82, 1–7 (1984)Google Scholar
  33. Levin, D. A.: Some genetic consequences of being a plant. In: Ecological genetics: the interface, pp 189–212. Ed. by P. F. Brussard. New York: Springer-Verlag 1978Google Scholar
  34. MacGinitie, G. E. and N. MacGinitie: Natural history of marine animals, 523 pp. New York: McGraw Hill 1968Google Scholar
  35. Mallet, A. L., E. Zouros, K. E. Gartner-Kepkay, K. R. Freeman and L. M. Dickie: Larval viability and heterozygote deficiency in populations of marine bivalves: evidence from pair matings in mussels. Mar. Biol. 87, 165–172 (1985)Google Scholar
  36. Morris, R. H., D. P. Abbott and E. C. Haderlie: Intertidal invertebrates of California, 690 pp. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press 1980Google Scholar
  37. Nei, M.: Genetic distances between populations. Am. Nat. 106, 283–292 (1972)Google Scholar
  38. Nei, M. and A. K. Roychoudhury: Sample variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics 76, 379–390 (1974)Google Scholar
  39. Nevo, E., A. Beiles and R. Ben-Shlomo: The evolutionary significance of genetic diversity: ecological, demographic and life history correlates. Lect. Notes Biomath. 53, 13–213 (1984)Google Scholar
  40. Newman, W. A.: California Transition Zone: significance of short-range endemics. In: Historical biogeography, plate tectonics and the changing environment, pp 399–416. Ed. by J. Gray and A. J. Boucot. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University Press 1979Google Scholar
  41. Nozaki, Y., D. M. Rye, K. K. Turekian and R. E. Dodge: A 200 year record of carbon-13 and carbon-14 variations in a Bermuda coral. Geophys. Res. Lett. 5, 825–828 (1978)Google Scholar
  42. Potts, D. C.: Generation times and the Quaternary evolution of reef-building corals. Paleobiology 10, 48–58 (1984)Google Scholar
  43. Potts, D. C., T. J. Done, P. J. Isdale and D. A. Fisk: Dominance of a coral community by the genus Porites (Scleractinia). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 23, 79–84 (1985)Google Scholar
  44. Poulik, M. D.: Starch gel electrophoresis in a discontinuous system of buffers. Nature, Lond. 180, 1477–1479 (1957)Google Scholar
  45. Ricketts, F. F. and J. Calvin: Between Pacific tides, 4th ed., 614 pp. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press 1968Google Scholar
  46. Sebens, K. P.: Reproductive ecology of the intertidal sea anemones Anthopleura xanthogrammica and Anthopleura elegantissima: body size, habitat and sexual reproduction. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 54, 225–250 (1981)Google Scholar
  47. Sebens, K. P.: Asexual reproduction in Anthopleura elegantissima: seasonality and spatial extent of clones. Ecology 63, 434–444 (1982)Google Scholar
  48. Shaw, C. R. and R. Prasad: Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes —a compilation of recipes. Biochem. Gen. 4, 297–320 (1970)Google Scholar
  49. Shick, J. M. and A. N. Lamb: Asexual reproduction and genetic population structure in the colonizing sea anemone Haliplanella luciae. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 153, 604–617 (1977)Google Scholar
  50. Siebert, A. E.: A description of the embryology, larval development and feeding of the sea anemones, Anthopleura elegantissima and Anthopleura xanthogrammica. Can. J. Zool. 52, 1383–1388 (1974)Google Scholar
  51. Smith, B. L.: Taxonomy and population genetics of the sea anemone genus Anthopleura in California. University of California at Santa Cruz: M.S. thesis 1986Google Scholar
  52. Sneath, P. H. A. and R. R. Sokal: Numerical taxonomy, 573 pp. San Francisco: Freeman and Co. 1973Google Scholar
  53. Sole-Cava, A. M., J. P. Thorpe and J. G. Kaye: Reproductive isolation with little genetic divergence between Urticina felina and U. eques. Mar. Biol. 85, 279–284 (1985)Google Scholar
  54. Thorpe, J. P.: Enzyme variation, genetic distance and evolutionary divergence in relation to levels of taxonomic separation. In: Protein polymorphism: adaptive and taxonomic significance, pp 131–152. Ed. by G. S. Oxford and D. Rollinson. New York: Academic Press 1983Google Scholar
  55. Tracey, M. L., K. Nelson, D. Hedgecock, R. A. Shleser and M. L. Pressick: Biochemical genetics of lobsters (Homarus): genetic variation and the structure of American lobster populations. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 33, 1108–1119 (1975)Google Scholar
  56. Valentine, J. W.: Numerical analysis of marine molluscan ranges on the extratropical northeastern Pacific shelf. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2, 246–255 (1966)Google Scholar
  57. Vasek, F. C.: Creosote Bush, long-lived clones in the Mojave Desert. Am. J. Bot. 67, 246–255 (1980)Google Scholar
  58. Verrill, A. E.: Notes on the Radiata in the museum of Yale College, with descriptions of new genera and species. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci. 1, 247–596 (1869)Google Scholar
  59. Wright, S.: Evolution and the genetics of populations, Vol. 4. Variability within and among natural populations, 579 pp. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1978Google Scholar
  60. Zouros, E. and D. W. Foltz: Possible explanations of heterozygote deficiency in bivalve molluscs. Malacologia 25, 583–591 (1984)Google Scholar
  61. Zouros, E., S. M. Singh and H. E. Miles: Growth rate in oysters: an overdominant phenotype and its possible explanations. Evolution 34, 856–867 (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. L. Smith
    • 1
  • D. C. Potts
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Marine SciencesUniversity of California at Santa CruzSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations