Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 23–27 | Cite as

Osteochondrosis dissecans of the talus

Comparison of results of surgical treatment in adolescents and adults
  • J. Bruns
  • B. Rosenbach
Original Articles

Summary

Clinical results in two groups of patients treated for osteochondrosis dissecans tali were examined in a follow-up examination: adolescents up to age 16 years versus adults. Thirteen patients were reexamined in each group. Clinical comparison revealed distinct differences between the groups. In adolescents there were eight excellent and three good results, only one fair, and one poor result. In contrast, adults demonstrated excellent results in only two and good results in five patients; five patients showed fair results and one a poor outcome. No signs of osteoarthrosis were detected in adolescents whereas in four adult patients slight radiological signs of osteoarthritis were visible. In both groups clinical and radiological results were better when the cartilage layer at the talar dome was found to be intact at the time of surgical intervention. Detectable cartilage damage at the time of operation was accompanied by a worse result at the time of follow-up examination. In conclusion, adolescents without any signs of joint locking or loose body formation should first be treated conservatively. The older the patient the shorter the period of nonsurgical treatment should be. In cases of increasing stages, joint locking, or formation of loose bodies surgical intervention is recommended.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aichroth P (1971) Osteochondosis dissecans of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 53:440–447Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aichroth P (1971) Osteochondral fractures and their relationship to osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 53:448–454Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alexander H, Lichtman D (1980) Surgical treatment of transchondral taler dome fractures (osteochondritis dissecans). J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62:646–652Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandi W (1951) Über die Ätiologie der Osteochondritis dissecans. Helv Chir Acta 3:221–225Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandi W (1978) Zur Pathogenese der Osteochondritis dissecans. Unfallheilkunde 81:295–298Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bargon G (1978) Röntgenologische Gradeinteilung der posttraumatischen Arthrose im oberen Sprunggelenk. Hefte Unfallheilkd 33:28–31Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bauer M, Jonsson K, Linden B (1987) Osteochondritis dissecans of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69:93–97Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berndt AL, Harty M (1951) Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dissecans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 41:988–1020Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blohm JMH, Strijk SP (1975) Lesions of the trochlea tali. Radiologia Clin 44:387–396Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bruns J, Rosenbach B (1990) Pressure distribution at the ankle joint. Clin Biomech 5:153–161Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Champbell CJ, Ranawat CS (1966) Osteochondritis dissecans: the question of etiology. J Trauma 6:201–221Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Canale ST, Belding RH (1980) Osteochondral lesions of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 62:97–102Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis MW (1970) Bilateral talar osteochondritis dissecans with lax ankle ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 52:168–170Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    DeGinder WL (1955) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. J Trauma 65:590–598Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dekel S, Weissman SJ (1978) Joint changes after overuse and peak over-loading of rabbit knees in vivo. Acta Orthop Scand 49:519–528Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gschwend N (1960) Zur Häufigkeit und Ätiologie der lateralen Form der Osteochondritis dissecans. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 51:491–500Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hakimzadeh L, Munzinger U (1979) Die Osteochondritis dissecans des oberen Sprunggelenkes: Langzeitstudie. Orthopdde 8:135–141Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hille E, Schulitz KP, Perzborn V (1984) Druck- und Kontaktflächenverläufe des oberen Sprunggelenkes unter verschiedenen Funktionen. In: Hackenbroch MJ, Refior HJ, Jdger M, Plitz W (eds) Funktionelle Anatomic und Pathomechanik des Sprunggelenkes. Thieme, Stuttgart New York, pp 52–57Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huylebroek JF, Martens M, Simon JP (1985) Transchondral talar dome fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 104:238–241Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kimizuka M, Kurosawa H, Fukubayashi T (1980) Load-bearing pattern of ankle joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 96:45–49Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koenig A (1888) Über freie Körper in den Gelenken. Dtsch Z Chir 27:90–103Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lindholm TS, Osterman K, Vankka E (1980) Osteochondritis dissecans of elbow, ankle and hip: a comparison survey. Clin Orthop 148:245–252Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lütten C, Lorenz H, Thomas W (1988) Refixation bei der Osteochondrosis dissecans mit resorbierbarem Material unter Verlaufsbeobachtungen mit der Kernspintomographie (MR). Sportverletzung/Sportschaden 2:61–65Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mannis CI (1986) Transchondral fractures of the dome of the talus sustained during weight training. Am J Sports Med 11: 354–356Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martinek H, Egkher E (1978) Untersuchung zur Biomechanik des oberen Sprunggelenkes bei Verkürzungen des Außenknöchels. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 91:39–43Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    McCullough CJ, Venugopal V (1979) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Clin Orthop 144:264–268Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mukherjee SK, Young AB (1973) Dome fracture of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 55:319–326Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Naumetz VA, Schweigel JF (1980) Osteocartilagenous lesions of the talar dome. J Trauma 20:924–927Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Noguchi K (1985) Biomechanical analysis of osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 59:215–222Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O'Donoghue DH (1966) Chondral and osteochondral fractures. J Trauma 6:469–481Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O'Farell TA, Costello BG (1982) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 64:494–497Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paar O, Rieck B, Bernett P (1983) Experimentelle Untersuchungen über belastungsabhängige Druck- und Kontaktflächen-verläufe an den Fußgelenken. Unfallheilkunde 86:531–534Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Paar O, Rieck B, Bernett P (1984) Druck- und Kontaktflächenverläufe auf der Talusrolle nach Durchtrennung der lateralen Bandverbindungen am oberen Sprunggelenk. Akt Chir 19:21–23Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Parè A (1840/1841) Oeuvres Completes, vol III. Ballière, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pettine KA, Morrey BF (1987) Osteochondral fractures of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 69:82–92Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pick MP (1955) Familial osteochondritis dissecans. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 37:142–145Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 58:356–357Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ray RB, Coughlin EJ (1947) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg 29:697–706Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Riede UN, Hehne HJ (1978) Inkongruenzarthrose. Hefte Unfallheilkd 133:12–23Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Riede UN, Willenegger H, Schenk R (1969) Experimenteller Beitrag zur Erklarung der sekunddren Arthrose bei Fracturen des oberen Sprunggelenks. Helv Chir Acta 3:343–348Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rodegerdts U (1975) Atiologie, Therapie und Prognose der Osteochondrosis dissecans der Talusrolle. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 83:45–55Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Röden S, Tillegard P, Unander-Scharin L (1953) Osteochondritis dissecans and similar lesions of the talus. Acta Orthop Scand 23:51–66Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rosenberg NJ (1965) Fractures of talar dome. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 47:1279–1283Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Scharling M (1978) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus. Acta Orthop Scand 49: 89–94Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Strougaard J (1964) Familial occurrence of osteochondritis dissecans. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 46:542–543Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Thompson JP, Coomer RL (1984) Osteochondral lesions of the talus in a sports medicine clinic. Am J Sports Med 12:460–463Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yablon IG, Segel D, Leach RE (1983) Ankle injuries. Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yvars MF (1975) Osteochondral fractures of the dome of the talus. Clin Orthop 114:185–191Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zinman C, Reis ND (1982) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus: use of the high resolution computed tomography. Acta Orthop Scand 53:697–700Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zollinger H, Dietschi C (1975) Osteochondrosis dissecans des Talus bei rezidivierenden Fußdistorsionen. Z Unfallmed Berufsk 68:39–43Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zsernaviczky J (1978) Hyperlipoproteinämie als mögliche Ursache der Osteochondrosis dissecans. Z Orthop 115:35–39Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Bruns
    • 1
  • B. Rosenbach
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of HamburgHamburg 20Germany
  2. 2.Department of General SurgeryAllgemeines KrankenhausHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations