Bulletin of Volcanology

, Volume 54, Issue 8, pp 685–695 | Cite as

Sedimentation of tephra by volcanic plumes. Part 2: controls on thickness and grain-size variations of tephra fall deposits

  • R S J Sparks
  • M I Bursik
  • G J Ablay
  • R M E Thomas
  • S N Carey
Article

Abstract

A model for sedimentation from turbulent suspensions predicts that tephra concentration decreases exponentially with time in an ascending volcanic column and in the overlying umbrella cloud. For grain-size distributions typical of plinian eruptions application of the model predicts for thickness variations in good agreement with the exponential thinning observed in tephra fall deposits. The model also predicts a proximal region where fallout from the plume margins results in a more rapid decrease in thickness so that the deposit shows two segments on a thickness versus distance plot. Several examples of deposits with two segments are known. The distance at which the two segments intersect is a measure of eruption column height. The thickness half-distance (∼ equivalent to the dispersal index of Walker) is strongly correlated with column height, but is also weakly dependent on grain-size distribution of the ejecta. For a dispersal index of 500 km2 (the plinian/subplinian boundary of Walker) column heights between 14 and 18 km are calculated. For ultraplinian deposits with D>50000 km2 column heights of at least 45 km are implied. Model grain-size distributions of the deposits have sorting values comparable to those observed in tephra fall deposits formed from eruption columns in a weak or negligible cross-wind. Median diameter decreases exponentially with distance as is observed. Sorting (σφ) improves with distance as is observed in plinian deposits in a weak wind. However, tephra fall deposits formed in strong winds do not show improved sorting with distance and proximal deposits are typically somewhat better sorted than the model calculations. Differences are attributed to the influence of wind which disperses particles further than predicted in our model and which has an increasing influence as particle size decreases.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bursik MI, Sparks RSJ, Gilbert JS, Carey SN (1992) Sedimentation of tephra by volcanic plumes: I Theory and its comparison with a study of the Fogo A Plinian deposit, Sao Miguel (Azores). Bull Volcanol 54:329–344Google Scholar
  2. Carey S, Sparks RSJ (1986) Quantitative models of the fallout and dispersal of tephra from volcanic eruption columns. Bull Volcanol 48:109–125Google Scholar
  3. Fierstein J, Nathenson M (1992) Another look at the calculation of fallout tephra volumes. Bull Volcanol 54:156–167Google Scholar
  4. Papale P, Rosi M (1992) A case of no-wind plinian fallout at Pululahua caldera (Ecuador): implications for models of clast dispersal. Bull Volcanol (in press)Google Scholar
  5. Pescatore T, Sparks RSJ, Brazier S (1987) Reverse grading in the Avellino plinian deposit of Vesuvius. Boll Soc Geol It 106:667–672Google Scholar
  6. Pyle DM (1989) The thickness, volume and grain size of tephra fall deposits. Bull Volcanol 51:1–15Google Scholar
  7. Sieh K, Bursik MI (1986) Most recent eruption of the Mono Craters, eastern central California. J Geophys Res 91:12539–12571Google Scholar
  8. Sparks RSJ (1986) The dimensions and dynamics of volcanic eruption columns. Bull Volcanol 48:3–15Google Scholar
  9. Sparks RSJ, Wilson L (1982) Explosive volcanic eruption —V. Observations of plume dynamics during the 1979 Soufrière eruption St. Vincent. Geophys J R Astron Soc 69:551–570Google Scholar
  10. Sparks RSJ, Wright JV (1979) Welded airfall tuffs. Geol Soc Am Spec Pap 180:155–165Google Scholar
  11. Sparks RSJ, Wilson L, Sigurdsson H (1981) The pyroclastic deposits of the 1875 eruption of Askja. Philos Trans R Soc London 229:241–273Google Scholar
  12. Sparks RSJ, Carey SN, Sigurdsson H (1991) Sedimentation from gravity currents generated by turbulent plumes. Sedimentology 38:839–856Google Scholar
  13. Susuki T (1983) A physical model for the dispersion of tephra. In: Shimozuru D, Yokoyama I (eds) Arc volcanism: physics and tectonics. TERRA PUB Tokyo: 93–113Google Scholar
  14. Thorarinsson S (1954) The eruptions of Hekla 1947–1948 II. 3. The tephra fall from Hekla. Vi's Islendinga, Reykjavik p 68Google Scholar
  15. Walker GPL (1971) Grain size characteristics of pyroclastic deposits. J Geol 79:696–714Google Scholar
  16. Walker GPL (1973) Explosive volcanic eruptions — a new classification scheme. Geol Rundsch 62:431–446Google Scholar
  17. Walker GPL (1980) The Taupo pumice: product of the most powerful known (ultraplinian) eruption? J Volcanol Geotherm Res 8:69–94Google Scholar
  18. Walker GPL, Croasdale R (1971) Two plinian type eruptions in the Azores. J Geol Soc London 127:17–55Google Scholar
  19. Woods AW (1988) The fluid dynamics and thermodynamics of plinian eruption columns. Bull Volcanol 50:169–193Google Scholar
  20. Woods AW, Bursik MI (1991) Particle fallout, thermal disequilibria and volcanic plumes. Bull Volcanol 53:559–570Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • R S J Sparks
    • 1
  • M I Bursik
    • 2
  • G J Ablay
    • 1
  • R M E Thomas
    • 1
  • S N Carey
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA
  3. 3.Graduate School of OceanographyUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations