Molecular and General Genetics MGG

, Volume 205, Issue 2, pp 276–284

Transcriptional regulation of DNA damage responsive (DDR) genes in different rad mutant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Janet A. Maga
  • Terrill A. McClanahan
  • Kevin McEntee
Article

Summary

The roles of the RAD genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the regulation of transcription of two DNA damage responsive (DDR) genes were investigated by examining the levels of the DDRA2 and DDR48 transcripts in different rad mutants after exposure to two different DNA damaging agents. Strains carrying mutations in either the RAD3, RAD6 or RAD52 genes were treated with increasing concentrations of 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (NQO) or N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and the DDR transcript levels were determined by Northern hybridization analysis. Our results indicate that the RAD3 gene is required for DDRA2 transcript production following NQO or MNNG treatments. Strains carrying mutations in either the RAD6 or RAD52 genes show an increased level of DDRA2 transcript in undamaged cells. However, the rad6 and rad52 mutants show a normal dose-dependent increase in DDRA2 transcript levels after NQO or MNNG exposure. The DDR48 gene appears to be regulated differently from DDRA2 in that this gene is induced in rad3 cells after damaging treatment but transcript induction is severely reduced in both rad6 and rad52 mutant strains. Although the rad mutations influence the kinetics of transcript accumulation, these effects do not account for the altered dose responses of the DDRA2 and DDR48 genes. Our results also demonstrate that the regulation of DDRA2 and DDR48 transcript levels by heat shock treatment is affected less severely in the different rad strains, a result which suggests that the RAD genes play an indirect role in DDR gene control. The different behavior of the DDRA2 and DDR48 genes in the various rad strains suggests that the regulatory responses of S. cerevisiae to DNA damage are complex.

Key words

DNA damage Heat shock Coordinate regulation DNA repair 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagg A, Kenyon CJ, Walker GC (1981) Inducibility of a gene product required for UV and chemical mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:5749–5753Google Scholar
  2. Brent R, Ptashne M (1981) Mechanism of action of the lexA gene product. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:4204–4208Google Scholar
  3. Elledge SJ, Walker GC (1983) Proteins required for ultraviolet light and chemical mutagenesis: identification of the products of the umuC locus of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 164:175–192Google Scholar
  4. Fogliano M, Schendel PF (1981) Evidence for the inducibility of the uvrB operon. Nature 289:196–198Google Scholar
  5. Higgins DR, Prakash S, Reynolds P, Polakowska R, Weber S, Prakash L (1983) Isolation and characterization of the RAD3 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and inviability of rad3 deletion mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:5680–5684Google Scholar
  6. Ho KSY (1975) Induction of double-strand breaks by X-rays in radiosensitive strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 30:327–334Google Scholar
  7. Huisman O, d'Ari R (1981) An inducible DNA replication-cell division coupling mechanism in E. coli. Nature 290:797–799Google Scholar
  8. Kenyon CJ, Walker GC (1981) Expression of the E. coli uvrA gene is inducible. Nature 289:808–810Google Scholar
  9. Lavi S (1981) Carcinogen-mediated amplification of viral DNA sequences in simian virus 40-transformed Chinese hamster embryo cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:6144–6148Google Scholar
  10. Lieberman MW, Beach LR, Palmiter RD (1983) Ultraviolet radiation induced metallothionein-I gene activation is associated with extensive DNA demethylation. Cell 35:207–214Google Scholar
  11. Maga JA, Dixon K (1984) Enhanced replication of damaged SV40 DNA in carcinogen-treated monkey cells. Photochem Photobiol 40:473–478Google Scholar
  12. Maga J, McEntee K (1985) Response of S. cerevisiae to N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine: mutagenesis, survival and DDR gene expression. Mol Gen Genet 200:313–321Google Scholar
  13. McClanahan T, McEntee K (1984) Specific transcripts are elevated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 4:2356–2363Google Scholar
  14. McClanahan T, McEntee K (1986) DNA damage and heat shock dually regulate genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 6:90–96Google Scholar
  15. Naumovski L, Friedberg EC (1983) A DNA repair gene required for the incision of damaged DNA is essential for viability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:4818–4821Google Scholar
  16. Prakash L (1974) Lack of chemically induced mutation in repairdeficient mutants of yeast. Genetics 78:1101–1118Google Scholar
  17. Prakash L (1977) Repair of pyrimidine dimers in radiation-sensitive mutants rad3, rad4, rad6 and rad9 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 94:31–50Google Scholar
  18. Resnick MA, Martin P (1976) The repair of double-stranded breaks in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its genetic control. Mol Gen Genet 143:119–129Google Scholar
  19. Roberts JW, Devoret R (1983) Lysogenic induction. In: Hendrix RW, Roberts JW, Stahl FW, Weisberg RA (eds) Lambda II. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, NY, pp 123–144Google Scholar
  20. Ruby SW, Szostak JW (1985) Specific Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes are expressed in response to DNA-damaging agents. Mol Cell Biol 5:75–84Google Scholar
  21. Sarasin AR, Hanawalt PC (1978) Carcinogens enhance survival of UV-irradiated simian virus 40 in treated monkey kidney cells: Induction of a recovery pathway? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:346–350Google Scholar
  22. Smith CL (1985) Response of recA-dependent operons to different DNA damage signals. J Biol Chem 260:10069–10074Google Scholar
  23. Tlsty TD, Brown PC, Schimke RT (1984) UV radiation facilitates methotrexate resistance and amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene in cultured 3T6 mouse cells. Mol Cell Biol 4:1050–1056Google Scholar
  24. Walker GC (1984) Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev 48:60–93Google Scholar
  25. Walker GC (1985) Inducible DNA repair systems. Annu Rev Biochem 54:425–457Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet A. Maga
    • 1
  • Terrill A. McClanahan
    • 1
  • Kevin McEntee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological ChemistryUCLA Medical SchoolLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations