Evaluation of signal detection theory on the effects of psychotropic drugs on critical flicker-fusion frequency in normal subjects
- 64 Downloads
- 16 Citations
Abstract
Critical flicker-fusion frequency (CFF) has often been applied to psychotropic drug evaluation as a measure of cortical arousal. There are several variables that must be considered for proper conclusions to be obtained from CFF experimental data. Psychological variables such as subject response bias are especially difficult to control. We studied the effects of single oral doses of 10 mg diazepam and 10 mg amphetamine sulfate on CFF values obtained by a block up-down spatial forced-choice method on 13 healthy volunteers (seven males and six females). Signal detection theory was also used to obtain the non-parametric value P(A) as a measure of sensory function and B as a measure of the psychological function of response bias. As a group, amphetamine increased CFF (Hz) and P(A) and diazepam decreased CFF (Hz) and P(A), with the most significant effects observed at 2 and 3 h after drug administration. B scores showed more individual variation with a trend towards a low score, or a tendency to report more flicker responses after diazepam. Separated by sex, the males had a higher percentage of subjects that demonstrated a reduction of CFF after diazepam, while the females had a higher percentage that demonstrated an increase in CFF after amphetamine. The results suggest that CFF changes following diazepam and amphetamine are mostly changes in sensory function and not changes in response bias. It is possible to apply detection theory to flicker-fusion studies and the accounting of bias by controlling, measuring or eliminating it is essential in interpretation of CFF data.
Key words
Amphetamine sulfate Critical flicker-fusion frequency Diazepam Response bias Signal detection theoryPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Asso D, Braier J (1982) Changes with menstrual cycle in psychophysiological and self-report evaluation. Biol Psychol 15:95–107Google Scholar
- Aufdembrinke B (1982) The measurement of CFF: some methodological considerations. Pharmacopsychiatr 15 Suppl 1:5–8Google Scholar
- Besser GM, Duncan C (1967) The time course of action of single doses of diazepam, chlorpromazine and some barbiturates as measured by auditory flutter fusion and visual flicker fusion thresholds in man. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 30:341–348Google Scholar
- Bobon DP, Lecoq A, von Frenckell R, Lavergne G (1982) Critical flicker fusion frequency — Introduction to the CINP session in Goteborg and methodological recommendations. Pharmacopsychiatr 15 Suppl 1:1–4Google Scholar
- Campbell RA, Lasky EZ (1968) Adaptive threshold procedures: BUDTIF. J Acoust Soc Am 44:537–541Google Scholar
- Clark WC, Brown JC, Rutschmann J (1967) Flicker sensitivity and response bias in psychiatric patients and normal subjects. J Abnorm Psychol 72:35–42Google Scholar
- Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. John Waley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Greenblatt DJ, Divoll M, Abernethy DR, Ochs HR, Shader RI (1983a) Benzodiazepine kinetics: Implication for therapeutics and pharmacogeriatrics. Drug Metab Rev 14:251–292Google Scholar
- Grenblatt DJ, Shader RI, Abernethy DR (1983b) Current status of benzodiazepams, Part 1. New Engl J Med 309:354–358Google Scholar
- McNicol D (1972) A primer of signal detection theory. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
- Roback GS, Krasno LR, Ivy AC (1952) Effect of analeptic drugs on the somnifacient effect of seconal and antihistaminics as measured by the flicker fusion threshold. J Appl Physiol 4:566–574Google Scholar
- Smart JV, Turner P (1966) Influence of urinary pH on the degree and duration of action of amphetamine on the critical flicker fusion frequency in man. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 26: 468–472Google Scholar
- Smith JM, Misiak H (1976) Critical flicker frequency (CFF) and psychotropic drugs in normal subjects — a review. Psychopharmacology 47:175–182Google Scholar
- Swets JA, Tanner WP, Birdsall TG (1961) Decision processes in perception. Psychol Rev 68:301–340Google Scholar
- Yang JC, Clark WC, Ngai SH, Berkowitz BA, Spector S (1979) Analgesic action and pharmacokinetics of morphine and diazepam in man: An evaluation by sensory decision theory. Anesthesiology 51:495–502Google Scholar