A maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test to predict \(\dot V\)O2 max

  • Luc A. Léger
  • J. Lambert


In order to validate a maximal multistage 20-m shuttle run test for the prediction of \(\dot V\)O2 max, 91 adults (32 females and 59 males, aged 27.3±9.2 and 24.8±5.5 year respectively and with mean \(\dot V\)O2 max (± SD) of 39.3±8.3 and 51.6±7.8 ml·kg−1·min−1 respectively) performed the test and had \(\dot V\)O2 max estimated by the retroextrapolation method (extrapolation to time zero of recovery of the exponential least squares regression of the first four 20-s recovery \(\dot V\)O2 values). Starting at 8 km·h−1 and increasing by 0.5 km·h−1 every 2 min, the 20-m shuttle run test enabled prediction of the \(\dot V\)O2 max (y, ml·kg−1·min−1) from the maximal speed (x, km·h−1) by means of the following regression equation: y=5.857x — 19.458; r=0.84 and SEE=5.4. Later, the multistage protocol was slightly modified to its final version, in which the test started at stage 7 Met and continued with a 1 Met (3.5 ml O2·kg−1·min−1) increment every 2 min. Twenty-five of the 91 subjects performed the 20-m shuttle test twice, once on a hard, low-friction surface (vinyl-asbestos tiles) and another time on a rubber floor, as well as a walking maximal multistage test on an inclined treadmill. There was no difference between the means of these tests or between the slopes of the \(\dot V\)O2max — maximal speed regressions for the two types of surfaces. The 20-m shuttle run test and another maximal multistage field test involving continuous track running gave comparable results (r=0.92, SEE=2.6 ml O2·kg−1·min−1, n=70). Finally, test and retest of the 20-m shuttle run test also yielded comparable results (r=0.975, SEE=2.0 ml O2·kg−1·min−1, n=50). It is concluded that the 20-m shuttle run test is a valid and reliable test for the prediction of the \(\dot V\)O2 max of male and female adults, individually or in groups, on most gymnasium surfaces.

Key words

\(\dot V\)O2 max Retroextrapolation method Validity Reproducibility Field test 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. American College of Sports Medicine (1975) Guidelines for graded exercise testing and exercise prescription. Lea and Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruce RA, Kusumi F, Hosmer D (1973) Maximal oxygen intake and nomographic assessment of functional aerobic impairment in cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 85: 546–562Google Scholar
  3. Cooper KH (1968) A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake. JAMA 203: 201–204Google Scholar
  4. Davies CTM (1968) Limitations to the prediction of maximum oxygen intake from cardiac frequency measurements. J Appl Physiol 24: 700–706Google Scholar
  5. Doolittle TL, Bigbee R (1968) The twelve-minute run-walk: a test of cardiorespiratory fitness of adolescent boys. Res Q Am Assoc Health Phys Educ 39: 491–495Google Scholar
  6. Falls HB, Humphrey LD (1976) Energy cost of running and walking in young women. Med Sci Sports 8: 9–13Google Scholar
  7. Froelicher V, Lancaster M (1974) The prediction of maximal oxygen consumption from a continuous exercise treadmill protocol. Am Heart J 87: 445–450Google Scholar
  8. Froelicher VF, Brammell H, Davis G, Noguera I, Stewart A, Lancaster MC (1974) A comparison of the reproducibility and physiologic response to three maximal treadmill exercise protocols. Chest 65: 512–517Google Scholar
  9. Léger L, Boucher R (1980) An indirect continuous running multistage field test: The Université de Montréal track test. Can J Appl Sports Sci 5: 77–84Google Scholar
  10. Léger LA, Seliger V, Brassard L (1980) Backward extrapolation of \(\dot V\)O2 max values from O2 recovery curve. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12: 24–27Google Scholar
  11. Martin BJ (1971) The reliability and validity of the twelve minute runwalk test for high school girls. M.Sc. Thesis in Physical Education, University of IdahoGoogle Scholar
  12. Massicotte D (1972) Application of a practical test to predict the maximal oxygen intake of high school boys. In: Taylor AW (ed) Training-scientific basis and application. Thomas, Springfield, pp 76–86Google Scholar
  13. Pollock ML, Bohannon RL, Cooper KH, Ayres JJ, Ward A, White SR, Linnerud AC (1976) A comparative analysis of four protocols for maximal treadmill stress testing. Am Heart J 92: 39–46Google Scholar
  14. Rowell LB, Taylor HL, Wang Y (1964) Limitations to prediction of maximal oxygen intake. J Appl Physiol 19: 919–927Google Scholar
  15. Sidney KH, Shephard RJ (1977) Maximum and submaximum exercise tests in men and women in the seven, eight and ninth decades of life. J Appl Physiol 43: 280–287Google Scholar
  16. Taylor HL, Wang Y, Rowell L, Blomqvist G (1963) The standardization and interpretation of submaximal and maximal tests of working capacity. Pediatrics 32: 703–722Google Scholar
  17. Wyndham CH (1967) Submaximal tests for estimating maximum oxygen intake. Can Med Assoc J 96: 736–745Google Scholar
  18. Wyndham CH, Strydom NB, Van Graan GH, Rensburg AJ, Rodgers GG, Greyson JS, Van der Walt WH (1971) Walk or jog for health: II Estimating the maximum aerobic capacity for exercise. S Afr Med J 45: 53–57Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luc A. Léger
    • 1
  • J. Lambert
    • 2
  1. 1.Département d'éducation physiqueUniversité de Montréal, CEPSUMMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Département de Médecine sociale et préventiveUniversité de MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations